1908 United States presidential election in South Carolina
The 1908 United States presidential election in South Carolina took place on November 3, 1908. Voters chose 9 representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County Results
Bryan 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in South Carolina |
---|
South Carolina overwhelmingly voted for the Democratic nominee, former U.S. Representative William Jennings Bryan, over the Republican nominee, Secretary of War William Howard Taft. Bryan won the state by a landslide margin of 87.9%. Although South Carolina was Taft's weakest state, he performed slightly better in the state than Theodore Roosevelt had four years prior.
Results
United States presidential election in South Carolina, 1908[1] | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Running mate | Popular vote | Electoral vote | ||||
Count | % | Count | % | |||||
Democratic | William Jennings Bryan of Nebraska | John Worth Kern of Indiana | 62,288 | 93.84% | 9 | 100.00% | ||
Republican | William Howard Taft of Ohio | James Schoolcraft Sherman of New York | 3,945 | 5.94% | 0 | 0.00% | ||
Socialist | Eugene Victor Debs of Indiana | Ben Hanford of New York | 100 | 0.15% | 0 | 0.00% | ||
Independence | Thomas Louis Hisgen of Massachusetts | John Temple Graves of Georgia | 46 | 0.07% | 0 | 0.00% | ||
Total | 66,379 | 100.00% | 9 | 100.00% |
Results by county
William Jennings Bryan[2] Democratic |
William Howard Taft[2] Republican |
Eugene Victor Debs[2] Socialist |
Thomas Hisgen[2] Independence |
Margin | Total votes cast | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # |
Abbeville | 1,481 | 99.13% | 9 | 0.60% | 0 | 0.00% | 4 | 0.27% | 1,472 | 98.53% | 1,494 |
Aiken | 1,990 | 97.64% | 48 | 2.36% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,942 | 95.29% | 2,038 |
Anderson | 2,099 | 97.18% | 58 | 2.69% | 3 | 0.14% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,041 | 94.49% | 2,160 |
Bamberg | 848 | 96.25% | 33 | 3.75% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 815 | 92.51% | 881 |
Barnwell | 1,407 | 94.11% | 88 | 5.89% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,319 | 88.23% | 1,495 |
Beaufort | 522 | 65.74% | 272 | 34.26% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 250 | 31.49% | 794 |
Berkeley | 609 | 72.16% | 235 | 27.84% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 374 | 44.31% | 844 |
Calhoun | 669 | 92.28% | 54 | 7.45% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.28% | 615 | 84.83% | 725 |
Charleston | 1,814 | 82.68% | 347 | 15.82% | 26 | 1.19% | 7 | 0.32% | 1,467 | 66.86% | 2,194 |
Cherokee | 1,506 | 95.80% | 66 | 4.20% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,440 | 91.60% | 1,572 |
Chester | 1,368 | 97.37% | 37 | 2.63% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,331 | 94.73% | 1,405 |
Chesterfield | 1,458 | 96.88% | 47 | 3.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,411 | 93.75% | 1,505 |
Clarendon | 1,091 | 94.62% | 62 | 5.38% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,029 | 89.25% | 1,153 |
Colleton | 1,399 | 93.89% | 91 | 6.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,308 | 87.79% | 1,490 |
Darlington | 1,279 | 98.38% | 21 | 1.62% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,258 | 96.77% | 1,300 |
Dorchester | 883 | 89.10% | 103 | 10.39% | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 0.50% | 780 | 78.71% | 991 |
Edgefield | 1,097 | 99.28% | 8 | 0.72% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,089 | 98.55% | 1,105 |
Fairfield | 830 | 98.34% | 12 | 1.42% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.24% | 818 | 96.92% | 844 |
Florence | 1,460 | 97.46% | 28 | 1.87% | 7 | 0.47% | 3 | 0.20% | 1,432 | 95.59% | 1,498 |
Georgetown | 544 | 83.31% | 108 | 16.54% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.15% | 436 | 66.77% | 653 |
Greenville | 2,774 | 92.93% | 176 | 5.90% | 28 | 0.94% | 7 | 0.23% | 2,598 | 87.04% | 2,985 |
Greenwood | 1,765 | 98.44% | 18 | 1.00% | 10 | 0.56% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,747 | 97.43% | 1,793 |
Hampton | 1,138 | 100.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,138 | 100.00% | 1,138 |
Horry | 1,247 | 95.70% | 56 | 4.30% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,191 | 91.40% | 1,303 |
Kershaw | 922 | 95.25% | 45 | 4.65% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.10% | 877 | 90.60% | 968 |
Lancaster | 1,730 | 96.65% | 58 | 3.24% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.11% | 1,672 | 93.41% | 1,790 |
Laurens | 2,160 | 97.21% | 61 | 2.75% | 1 | 0.05% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,099 | 94.46% | 2,222 |
Lee | 963 | 94.13% | 58 | 5.67% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.20% | 905 | 88.47% | 1,023 |
Lexington | 2,508 | 96.87% | 80 | 3.09% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,428 | 93.78% | 2,589 |
Marion | 2,007 | 95.66% | 91 | 4.34% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,916 | 91.33% | 2,098 |
Marlboro | 917 | 98.29% | 16 | 1.71% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 901 | 96.57% | 933 |
Newberry | 1,681 | 97.39% | 44 | 2.55% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.06% | 1,637 | 94.84% | 1,726 |
Oconee | 1,126 | 86.62% | 172 | 13.23% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.15% | 954 | 73.38% | 1,300 |
Orangeburg | 2,687 | 86.87% | 405 | 13.09% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.03% | 2,282 | 73.78% | 3,093 |
Pickens | 1,241 | 95.68% | 56 | 4.32% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,185 | 91.36% | 1,297 |
Richland | 1,750 | 87.19% | 236 | 11.76% | 18 | 0.90% | 3 | 0.15% | 1,514 | 75.44% | 2,007 |
Saluda | 1,385 | 99.28% | 8 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.07% | 1 | 0.07% | 1,377 | 98.71% | 1,395 |
Spartanburg | 4,162 | 94.76% | 225 | 5.12% | 5 | 0.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,937 | 89.64% | 4,392 |
Sumter | 1,228 | 87.15% | 173 | 12.28% | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 0.57% | 1,055 | 74.88% | 1,409 |
Union | 1,389 | 96.59% | 49 | 3.41% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,340 | 93.18% | 1,438 |
Williamsburg | 1,550 | 89.60% | 180 | 10.40% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,370 | 79.19% | 1,730 |
York | 1,606 | 98.23% | 29 | 1.77% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,577 | 96.45% | 1,635 |
Totals | 62,290 | 93.80% | 3,963 | 5.97% | 100 | 0.15% | 52 | 0.08% | 58,327 | 87.84% | 66,405 |
References
- "1908 Presidential General Election Results – South Carolina". U.S. Election Atlas. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
- Géoelections; Popular Vote at the Presidential Election for 1908 (.xlsx file for €30 including full minor party figures)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.