False vacuum

In quantum field theory, a false vacuum[1] is a hypothetical vacuum that is not actively decaying, but somewhat yet not entirely stable ("metastable").[2] It may last for a very long time in that state (a property known as metastability), and might eventually move to a more stable state, an event known as vacuum decay. The most common suggestion of how such a change might happen is called bubble nucleation – if a small region of the universe by chance reached a more stable vacuum, this "bubble" (also called "bounce")[3][4] would spread.

A scalar field φ (which represents physical position) in a false vacuum. Note that the energy E is higher in the false vacuum than that in the true vacuum or ground state, but there is a barrier preventing the field from classically rolling down to the true vacuum. Therefore, the transition to the true vacuum must be stimulated by the creation of high-energy particles or through quantum-mechanical tunneling.

A false vacuum exists at a local minimum of energy and is therefore not stable, in contrast to a true vacuum, which exists at a global minimum and is stable.

Definition of true vs false vacuum

A vacuum is defined as a space with as little energy in it as possible. Despite the name, the vacuum still has quantum fields. A true vacuum is stable because it is at a global minimum of energy, and is commonly assumed to coincide with a physical vacuum state we live in. It is possible that a physical vacuum state is a configuration of quantum fields representing a local minimum but not global minimum of energy. This type of vacuum state is called a "false vacuum".

Implications

Existential threat

If a more stable vacuum state were able to arise, the effects may vary from complete cessation of existing fundamental forces, elementary particles and structures comprising them, to subtle change in some cosmological parameters, mostly depending on potential difference between true and false vacuum. Some false vacuum decay scenarios are compatible with survival of structures like galaxies and stars[5][6] or even life[7] while others involve the full destruction of baryonic matter[8] or even immediate gravitational collapse of the universe,[9] although in this last case the possibility to causally connect (i.e. nucleate) the true vacuum from inside of the false vacuum area is dubious.[10]

In a 2005 paper published in Nature, as part of their investigation into global catastrophic risks, MIT physicist Max Tegmark and Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom calculate the natural risks of the destruction of the Earth at less than 1 per gigayear from all events, including a transition to a lower vacuum state. They argue that due to observer selection effects, we might underestimate the chances of being destroyed by vacuum decay because any information about this event would reach us only at the instant when we too were destroyed. This is in contrast to events like risks from impacts, gamma-ray bursts, supernovae and hypernovae, the frequencies of which we have adequate direct measures.[11]

Inflation

Cosmic inflation may be an effect of a false vacuum, according to several theories.

The inflation itself may be the consequence of the Higgs field trapped in a false vacuum state[12] with Higgs self-coupling λ and its βλ function very close to zero at the Planck scale.[13]:218 A future electron-positron collider would be able to provide the precise measurements of the top quark needed for such calculations.[13]

Chaotic Inflation Theory suggests that the universe may be in either a false vacuum or a true vacuum state.

Alan Guth, in his original proposal for cosmic inflation,[14] proposed that inflation could end through quantum mechanical bubble nucleation of the sort described above. See History of Chaotic inflation theory. It was soon understood that a homogeneous and isotropic universe could not be preserved through the violent tunneling process. This led Andrei Linde[15] and, independently, Andreas Albrecht and Paul Steinhardt,[16] to propose "new inflation" or "slow roll inflation" in which no tunnelling occurs, and the inflationary scalar field instead graphs as a gentle slope.

Vacuum decay varieties

Electroweak vacuum decay
Electroweak vacuum stability landscape as estimated in 2012[13]
Electroweak vacuum stability landscape as estimated in 2018[4]

The stability criteria for the electroweak interaction was first formulated in 1979[17] as a function of the masses of the theoretical Higgs boson and the heaviest fermion. Discovery of the Top quark in 1995 and the Higgs boson in 2012 have allowed physicists to validate the criteria against experiment, therefore since 2012 Electroweak interaction is considered as the most promising candidate for metastable fundamental force.[13] The corresponding false vacuum hypothesis is called either 'Electroweak vacuum instability' or 'Higgs vacuum instability'.[18] The present false vacuum state is called (De Sitter space), while tentative true vacuum is called (Anti-de Sitter space).[19][20]

The diagrams show the uncertainty ranges of Higgs boson and top quark masses as oval-shaped lines. Underlying colors indicate if the electroweak vacuum state is likely to be stable, merely long-lived or completely unstable for given combination of masses.[21][22] The "electroweak vacuum decay" hypothesis was sometimes misreported as the Higgs boson "ending" the universe.[23][24][25] A 125.18±0.16 GeV/c2 [26] Higgs boson mass is likely to be on the metastable side of stable-metastable boundary (estimated in 2012 as 123.8–135.0 GeV.[13]) However, a definitive answer requires much more precise measurements of the top quark's pole mass,[13] although improved measurement precision of Higgs boson and top quark masses further reinforced the claim of physical electroweak vacuum being in the metastable state as of 2018.[4] Nonetheless, new physics beyond the Standard Model of Particle Physics could drastically change the stability landscape division lines, rendering previous stability and metastability criteria incorrect.[27][28]

If measurements of the Higgs boson and top quark suggest that our universe lies within a false vacuum of this kind, this would imply that, more than likely in many billions of years,[29] the bubble's effects will propagate across the universe at nearly the speed of light from its origin in space-time.

Other decay modes

Bubble nucleation

When the false vacuum decays, the lower-energy true vacuum forms through a process known as bubble nucleation.[30][31][32][33][34][3] In this process, instanton effects cause a bubble containing the true vacuum to appear. The walls of the bubble (or domain walls) have a positive surface tension, as energy is expended as the fields roll over the potential barrier to the true vacuum. The former tends as the cube of the bubble's radius while the latter is proportional to the square of its radius, so there is a critical size at which the total energy of the bubble is zero; smaller bubbles tend to shrink, while larger bubbles tend to grow. To be able to nucleate, the bubble must overcome an energy barrier of height[3]

 

 

 

 

(Eq. 1)

where is the difference in energy between the true and false vacuums, is the unknown (possibly extremely large) surface tension of the domain wall, and is the radius of the bubble. Rewriting Eq. 1 gives the critical radius as

 

 

 

 

(Eq. 2)

A bubble smaller than the critical size can overcome the potential barrier via quantum tunnelling of instantons to lower energy states. For a large potential barrier, the tunneling rate per unit volume of space is given by[35]

 

 

 

 

(Eq. 3)

where is the reduced Planck constant. As soon as a bubble of lower-energy vacuum grows beyond the critical radius defined by Eq. 2, the bubble's wall will begin to accelerate outward. Due to the typically large difference in energy between the false and true vacuums, the speed of the wall approaches the speed of light extremely quickly. The bubble does not produce any gravitational effects because the negative energy density of the bubble interior is cancelled out by the positive kinetic energy of the wall.[9]

Small bubbles of true vacuum can be inflated to critical size by providing energy,[36] although required energy densities are several orders of magnitude larger than what is attained in any natural or artificial process.[8] It is also thought that certain environments can catalyze bubble formation by lowering the potential barrier.[37]

Nucleation seeds
Further information: Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider § Critics of high energy experiments, and Safety of particle collisions at the Large Hadron Collider

In a study in 2015,[37] it was pointed out that the vacuum decay rate could be vastly increased in the vicinity of black holes, which would serve as a nucleation seed.[38] According to this study, a potentially catastrophic vacuum decay could be triggered at any time by primordial black holes, should they exist. The authors note however that if primordial black holes cause a false vacuum collapse then it should have happened long before humans evolved on Earth. A subsequent study in 2017 indicated that the bubble would collapse into a primordial black hole rather than originate from it, either by ordinary collapse or by bending space in such a way that it breaks off into a new universe.[39] In 2019, it was found that although small non-spinning black holes may increase true vacuum nucleation rate, rapidly spinning black holes will stabilize false vacuums to decay rates lower than expected for flat space-time.[40] Proposed alternative nucleation seeds include cosmic strings[41] and magnetic monopoles.[8]

If particle collisions produce mini black holes then energetic collisions such as the ones produced in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) could trigger such a vacuum decay event, a scenario which has attracted the attention of the news media. It is likely to be unrealistic, because if such mini black holes can be created in collisions, they would also be created in the much more energetic collisions of cosmic radiation particles with planetary surfaces or during the early life of the universe as tentative primordial black holes.[42] Hut and Rees[43] note that, because cosmic ray collisions have been observed at much higher energies than those produced in terrestrial particle accelerators, these experiments should not, at least for the foreseeable future, pose a threat to our current vacuum. Particle accelerators have reached energies of only approximately eight tera electron volts (8×1012 eV). Cosmic ray collisions have been observed at and beyond energies of 5×1019 eV, six million times more powerful – the so-called Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin limit – and cosmic rays in vicinity of origin may be more powerful yet. John Leslie has argued[44] that if present trends continue, particle accelerators will exceed the energy given off in naturally occurring cosmic ray collisions by the year 2150. Fears of this kind were raised by critics of both the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the Large Hadron Collider at the time of their respective proposal, and determined to be unfounded by scientific inquiry.

False vacuum decay in fiction

False vacuum decay event is occasionally used as a plot device in works picturing a doomsday event.

See also

Notes
^Note 1 A paper by Coleman and de Luccia which attempted to include simple gravitational assumptions into these theories noted that if this was an accurate representation of nature, then the resulting universe "inside the bubble" in such a case would appear to be extremely unstable and would almost immediately collapse:

In general, gravitation makes the probability of vacuum decay smaller; in the extreme case of very small energy-density difference, it can even stabilize the false vacuum, preventing vacuum decay altogether. We believe we understand this. For the vacuum to decay, it must be possible to build a bubble of total energy zero. In the absence of gravitation, this is no problem, no matter how small the energy-density difference; all one has to do is make the bubble big enough, and the volume/surface ratio will do the job. In the presence of gravitation, though, the negative energy density of the true vacuum distorts geometry within the bubble with the result that, for a small enough energy density, there is no bubble with a big enough volume/surface ratio. Within the bubble, the effects of gravitation are more dramatic. The geometry of space-time within the bubble is that of anti-de Sitter space, a space much like conventional de Sitter space except that its group of symmetries is O(3, 2) rather than O(4, 1). Although this space-time is free of singularities, it is unstable under small perturbations, and inevitably suffers gravitational collapse of the same sort as the end state of a contracting Friedmann universe. The time required for the collapse of the interior universe is on the order of ... microseconds or less.

The possibility that we are living in a false vacuum has never been a cheering one to contemplate. Vacuum decay is the ultimate ecological catastrophe; in the new vacuum there are new constants of nature; after vacuum decay, not only is life as we know it impossible, so is chemistry as we know it. However, one could always draw stoic comfort from the possibility that perhaps in the course of time the new vacuum would sustain, if not life as we know it, at least some structures capable of knowing joy. This possibility has now been eliminated.

The second special case is decay into a space of vanishing cosmological constant, the case that applies if we are now living in the debris of a false vacuum which decayed at some early cosmic epoch. This case presents us with less interesting physics and with fewer occasions for rhetorical excess than the preceding one. It is now the interior of the bubble that is ordinary Minkowski space ...

— Sidney Coleman and Frank De Luccia

References
  1. "[2006.06003] Observing the fate of the false vacuum with a quantum laboratory".
  2. "Vacuum decay: the ultimate catastrophe". Cosmos Magazine. 2015-09-13. Retrieved 2020-09-16.
  3. C. Callan; S. Coleman (1977). "Fate of the false vacuum. II. First quantum corrections". Phys. Rev. D16 (6): 1762–68. Bibcode:1977PhRvD..16.1762C. doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1762.
  4. Tommi Markkanen et al., Cosmological Aspects of Higgs Vacuum Metastability
  5. Lorenz, Christiane S.; Funcke, Lena; Calabrese, Erminia; Hannestad, Steen (2019). "Time-varying neutrino mass from a supercooled phase transition: Current cosmological constraints and impact on the Ωm−σ8 plane". Physical Review D. 99 (2): 023501. arXiv:1811.01991. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.023501. S2CID 119344201.
  6. Landim, Ricardo G.; Abdalla, Elcio (2017). "Metastable dark energy". Physics Letters B. 764: 271–276. arXiv:1611.00428. Bibcode:2017PhLB..764..271L. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.11.044. S2CID 119279028.
  7. Crone, Mary M.; Sher, Marc (1991). "The environmental impact of vacuum decay". American Journal of Physics. 59 (1): 25. Bibcode:1991AmJPh..59...25C. doi:10.1119/1.16701.
  8. M.S. Turner; F. Wilczek (1982). "Is our vacuum metastable?" (PDF). Nature. 298 (5875): 633–634. Bibcode:1982Natur.298..633T. doi:10.1038/298633a0. S2CID 4274444. Retrieved 2015-10-31.
  9. Coleman, Sidney; De Luccia, Frank (1980-06-15). "Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay" (PDF). Physical Review D. 21 (12): 3305–3315. Bibcode:1980PhRvD..21.3305C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.3305. OSTI 1445512.
  10. Banks, T. (2002). "Heretics of the False Vacuum: Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay 2". arXiv:hep-th/0211160.
  11. M. Tegmark; N. Bostrom (2005). "Is a doomsday catastrophe likely?" (PDF). Nature. 438 (5875): 754. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..754T. doi:10.1038/438754a. PMID 16341005. S2CID 4390013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-09. Retrieved 2016-03-16.
  12. Chris Smeenk, False Vacuum: Early Universe Cosmology and the Development of Inflation
  13. Alekhin, S.; Djouadi, A.; Moch, S.; Hoecker, A.; Riotto, A. (2012-08-13). "The top quark and Higgs boson masses and the stability of the electroweak vacuum". Physics Letters B. 716 (1): 214–219. arXiv:1207.0980. Bibcode:2012PhLB..716..214A. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.024. S2CID 28216028.
  14. A. H. Guth (1981-01-15). "The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems". Physical Review D. 23 (2): 347–356. Bibcode:1981PhRvD..23..347G. doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347. OCLC 4433735058.
  15. A. Linde (1982). "A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution Of The Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy And Primordial Monopole Problems". Phys. Lett. B. 108 (6): 389. Bibcode:1982PhLB..108..389L. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9.
  16. A. Albrecht; P. J. Steinhardt (1982). "Cosmology For Grand Unified Theories With Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking". Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (17): 1220–1223. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..48.1220A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1220.
  17. N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Bounds on the Fermions and Higgs Boson Masses in Grand Unified Theories, 1979
  18. Kohri, Kazunori; Matsui, Hiroki (2018). "Electroweak vacuum instability and renormalized vacuum field fluctuations in Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker background". Physical Review D. 98 (10): 103521. arXiv:1704.06884. Bibcode:2018PhRvD..98j3521K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.103521. S2CID 39999058.
  19. Hook, Anson; Kearney, John; Shakya, Bibhushan; Zurek, Kathryn M. (2015). "Probable or improbable universe? Correlating electroweak vacuum instability with the scale of inflation". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (1): 61. arXiv:1404.5953. Bibcode:2015JHEP...01..061H. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)061. S2CID 118737905.
  20. Kohri, Kazunori; Matsui, Hiroki (2017). "Electroweak vacuum instability and renormalized Higgs field vacuum fluctuations in the inflationary universe". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2017 (8): 011. arXiv:1607.08133. Bibcode:2017JCAP...08..011K. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/08/011. S2CID 119216421.
  21. Ellis, J.; Espinosa, J.R.; Giudice, G.F.; Hoecker, A.; Riotto, A. (2009). "The Probable Fate of the Standard Model". Phys. Lett. B. 679 (4): 369–375. arXiv:0906.0954. Bibcode:2009PhLB..679..369E. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.054. S2CID 17422678.
  22. Masina, Isabella (2013-02-12). "Higgs boson and top quark masses as tests of electroweak vacuum stability". Phys. Rev. D. 87 (5): 053001. arXiv:1209.0393. Bibcode:2013PhRvD..87e3001M. doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.053001. S2CID 118451972.
  23. Klotz, Irene (2013-02-18). "Universe Has Finite Lifespan, Higgs Boson Calculations Suggest". Huffington Post. Reuters. Retrieved 21 February 2013. Earth will likely be long gone before any Higgs boson particles set off an apocalyptic assault on the universe
  24. Hoffman, Mark (2013-02-19). "Higgs Boson Will Destroy The Universe Eventually". ScienceWorldReport. Retrieved 21 February 2013.
  25. "Higgs boson will aid in creation of the universe—and how it will end". Catholic Online/NEWS CONSORTIUM. 2013-02-20. Archived from the original on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 21 February 2013. [T]he Earth will likely be long gone before any Higgs boson particles set off an apocalyptic assault on the universe
  26. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group) (2018). "Review of Particle Physics". Physical Review D. 98 (3): 1–708. Bibcode:2018PhRvD..98c0001T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001. PMID 10020536.
  27. Salvio, Alberto (2015-04-09). "A Simple Motivated Completion of the Standard Model below the Planck Scale: Axions and Right-Handed Neutrinos". Physics Letters B. 743: 428–434. arXiv:1501.03781. Bibcode:2015PhLB..743..428S. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.03.015. S2CID 119279576.
  28. Branchina, Vincenzo; Messina, Emanuele; Platania, Alessia (2014). "Top mass determination, Higgs inflation, and vacuum stability". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (9): 182. arXiv:1407.4112. Bibcode:2014JHEP...09..182B. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2014)182. S2CID 102338312.
  29. Boyle, Alan (2013-02-19). "Will our universe end in a 'big slurp'? Higgs-like particle suggests it might". NBC News' Cosmic log. Retrieved 21 February 2013. [T]he bad news is that its mass suggests the universe will end in a fast-spreading bubble of doom. The good news? It'll probably be tens of billions of years. The article quotes Fermilab's Joseph Lykken: "[T]he parameters for our universe, including the Higgs [and top quark's masses] suggest that we're just at the edge of stability, in a "metastable" state. Physicists have been contemplating such a possibility for more than 30 years. Back in 1982, physicists Michael Turner and Frank Wilczek wrote in Nature that "without warning, a bubble of true vacuum could nucleate somewhere in the universe and move outwards..."
  30. M. Stone (1976). "Lifetime and decay of excited vacuum states". Phys. Rev. D. 14 (12): 3568–3573. Bibcode:1976PhRvD..14.3568S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3568.
  31. P.H. Frampton (1976). "Vacuum Instability and Higgs Scalar Mass". Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (21): 1378–1380. Bibcode:1976PhRvL..37.1378F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1378.
  32. M. Stone (1977). "Semiclassical methods for unstable states". Phys. Lett. B. 67 (2): 186–188. Bibcode:1977PhLB...67..186S. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90099-5.
  33. P.H. Frampton (1977). "Consequences of Vacuum Instability in Quantum Field Theory". Phys. Rev. D. 15 (10): 2922–28. Bibcode:1977PhRvD..15.2922F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2922.
  34. S. Coleman (1977). "Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory". Phys. Rev. D. 15 (10): 2929–36. Bibcode:1977PhRvD..15.2929C. doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2929.
  35. Wenyuan Ai, Aspects of False Vacuum Decay (2019)
  36. Arnold, Peter (1992). "A Review of the Instability of Hot Electroweak Theory and its Bounds on $m_h$ and $m_t$". arXiv:hep-ph/9212303.
  37. Burda, Philipp; Gregory, Ruth; Moss, Ian G. (2015). "Vacuum metastability with black holes". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (8): 114. arXiv:1503.07331. Bibcode:2015JHEP...08..114B. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)114. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 53978709.
  38. "Could Black Holes Destroy the Universe?". 2015-04-02.
  39. Deng, Heling; Vilenkin, Alexander (2017). "Primordial black hole formation by vacuum bubbles". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2017 (12): 044. arXiv:1710.02865. Bibcode:2017JCAP...12..044D. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/044. S2CID 119442566.
  40. Oshita, Naritaka; Ueda, Kazushige; Yamaguchi, Masahide (2020). "Vacuum decays around spinning black holes". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2020 (1): 015. arXiv:1909.01378. Bibcode:2020JHEP...01..015O. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)015. S2CID 202541418.
  41. Firouzjahi, Hassan; Karami, Asieh; Rostami, Tahereh (2020). "Vacuum decay in the presence of a cosmic string". Physical Review D. 101 (10): 104036. arXiv:2002.04856. Bibcode:2020PhRvD.101j4036F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.104036. S2CID 211082988.
  42. Cho, Adrian (2015-08-03). "Tiny black holes could trigger collapse of universe—except that they don't". Sciencemag.org.
  43. P. Hut; M.J. Rees (1983). "How stable is our vacuum?". Nature. 302 (5908): 508–509. Bibcode:1983Natur.302..508H. doi:10.1038/302508a0. S2CID 4347886.
  44. John Leslie (1998). The End of the World:The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-14043-0.
  45. Geoffrey A. Landis (1988). "Vacuum States". Isaac Asimov's Science Fiction: July.
  46. Stephen Baxter (2000). Time. ISBN 978-0-7653-1238-9.

Further reading
  • Johann Rafelski and Berndt Muller (1985). The Structured Vacuum – thinking about nothing. Harri Deutsch. ISBN 978-3-87144-889-8.
  • Sidney Coleman (1988). Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures. ISBN 978-0-521-31827-3.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.