1932 United States presidential election in Alabama

The 1932 United States presidential election in Alabama took place on November 8, 1932, as part of the 1932 United States presidential election. Alabama voters chose eleven[2] representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

1932 United States presidential election in Alabama

November 8, 1932[1]

All 11 Alabama votes to the Electoral College
 
Nominee Franklin D. Roosevelt Herbert Hoover
Party Democratic Republican
Home state New York California
Running mate John Nance Garner Charles Curtis
Electoral vote 11 0
Popular vote 207,910 34,675
Percentage 84.7% 14.1%

County Results
Roosevelt
  40-50%
  50-60%
  60-70%
  70-80%
  80-90%
  90-100%


President before election

Herbert Hoover
Republican

Elected President

Franklin D. Roosevelt
Democratic

Alabama was won by Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt (DNew York), running with Speaker John Nance Garner, with 84.74% of the popular vote, against incumbent President Herbert Hoover (RCalifornia), running with Vice President Charles Curtis, with 14.13% of the popular vote.[3][4]

Results

1932 United States presidential election in Alabama
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Franklin D. Roosevelt 207,910 84.74%
Republican Herbert Hoover (inc.) 34,675 14.13%
Socialist Norman Thomas 2,030 0.83%
Communist William Z. Foster 726 0.30%
Prohibition William David Upshaw 13 0.01%
Total votes 245,354 100%

Results by county

County Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Democratic
Herbert Clark Hoover
Republican
Norman Mattoon Thomas
Socialist
William Z. Foster
Communist
Roger Ward Babson
Prohibition
Margin Total votes cast[5]
# % # % # % # % # % # %
Autauga 1,322 89.81% 138 9.38% 11 0.75% 1 0.07% 0 0.00% 1,184 80.43% 1,472
Baldwin 2,097 75.43% 544 19.57% 131 4.71% 8 0.29% 0 0.00% 1,553 55.86% 2,780
Barbour 2,207 96.88% 64 2.81% 6 0.26% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 2,143 94.07% 2,278
Bibb 1,636 90.29% 145 8.00% 31 1.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,491 82.28% 1,812
Blount 2,232 77.99% 582 20.34% 43 1.50% 5 0.17% 0 0.00% 1,650 57.65% 2,862
Bullock 1,004 98.72% 12 1.18% 1 0.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 992 97.54% 1,017
Butler 2,280 96.45% 74 3.13% 9 0.38% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 2,206 93.32% 2,364
Calhoun 4,392 85.98% 685 13.41% 28 0.55% 3 0.06% 0 0.00% 3,707 72.57% 5,108
Chambers 2,552 87.85% 342 11.77% 7 0.24% 4 0.14% 0 0.00% 2,210 76.08% 2,905
Cherokee 1,897 83.09% 359 15.72% 23 1.01% 4 0.18% 0 0.00% 1,538 67.37% 2,283
Chilton 1,664 51.17% 1,533 47.14% 53 1.63% 2 0.06% 0 0.00% 131 4.03% 3,252
Choctaw 1,533 96.90% 48 3.03% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,485 93.87% 1,582
Clarke 2,408 97.69% 53 2.15% 3 0.12% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 2,355 95.54% 2,465
Clay 2,104 68.78% 933 30.50% 13 0.42% 9 0.29% 0 0.00% 1,171 38.28% 3,059
Cleburne 1,403 77.43% 405 22.35% 2 0.11% 2 0.11% 0 0.00% 998 55.08% 1,812
Coffee 2,868 96.73% 95 3.20% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 2,773 93.52% 2,965
Colbert 2,908 89.64% 312 9.62% 24 0.74% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,596 80.02% 3,244
Conecuh 2,125 94.91% 114 5.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,011 89.82% 2,239
Coosa 1,265 82.63% 250 16.33% 15 0.98% 1 0.07% 0 0.00% 1,015 66.30% 1,531
Covington 3,855 97.15% 99 2.49% 10 0.25% 4 0.10% 0 0.00% 3,756 94.66% 3,968
Crenshaw 2,248 93.20% 127 5.27% 3 0.12% 30 1.24% 4 0.17% 2,121 87.94% 2,412
Cullman 2,910 73.78% 956 24.24% 71 1.80% 7 0.18% 0 0.00% 1,954 49.54% 3,944
Dale 2,300 93.65% 155 6.31% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,145 87.34% 2,456
Dallas 3,027 96.62% 93 2.97% 12 0.38% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 2,934 93.65% 3,133
DeKalb 4,217 54.13% 3,496 44.88% 73 0.94% 4 0.05% 0 0.00% 721 9.26% 7,790
Elmore 3,197 87.88% 159 4.37% 7 0.19% 275 7.56% 0 0.00% 2,922[lower-alpha 1] 80.32% 3,638
Escambia 2,024 92.67% 157 7.19% 3 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,867 85.49% 2,184
Etowah 5,167 82.08% 1,066 16.93% 62 0.98% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,101 65.15% 6,295
Fayette 2,013 72.70% 733 26.47% 19 0.69% 4 0.14% 0 0.00% 1,280 46.23% 2,769
Franklin 2,876 64.53% 1,547 34.71% 34 0.76% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,329 29.82% 4,457
Geneva 2,559 90.33% 270 9.53% 1 0.04% 3 0.11% 0 0.00% 2,289 80.80% 2,833
Greene 665 95.82% 9 1.30% 20 2.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 645[lower-alpha 2] 92.94% 694
Hale 1,276 94.59% 70 5.19% 1 0.07% 2 0.15% 0 0.00% 1,206 89.40% 1,349
Henry 1,741 97.43% 42 2.35% 4 0.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,699 95.08% 1,787
Houston 3,863 95.83% 157 3.89% 7 0.17% 2 0.05% 2 0.05% 3,706 91.94% 4,031
Jackson 3,112 76.69% 938 23.11% 8 0.20% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,174 53.57% 4,058
Jefferson 30,858 85.15% 4,567 12.60% 779 2.15% 34 0.09% 1 0.00% 26,291 72.55% 36,239
Lamar 2,207 89.24% 258 10.43% 4 0.16% 4 0.16% 0 0.00% 1,949 78.81% 2,473
Lauderdale 3,336 88.09% 431 11.38% 19 0.50% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 2,905 76.71% 3,787
Lawrence 1,920 86.53% 299 13.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,621 73.05% 2,219
Lee 1,988 94.53% 103 4.90% 11 0.52% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1,885 89.63% 2,103
Limestone 2,667 95.94% 107 3.85% 5 0.18% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 2,560 92.09% 2,780
Lowndes 1,073 98.35% 18 1.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,055 96.70% 1,091
Macon 905 94.07% 56 5.82% 1 0.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 849 88.25% 962
Madison 4,795 88.76% 559 10.35% 45 0.83% 3 0.06% 0 0.00% 4,236 78.42% 5,402
Marengo 2,097 95.45% 50 2.28% 50 2.28% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,047 93.17% 2,197
Marion 2,325 80.73% 545 18.92% 5 0.17% 1 0.03% 4 0.14% 1,780 61.81% 2,880
Marshall 3,921 79.45% 904 18.32% 65 1.32% 45 0.91% 0 0.00% 3,017 61.13% 4,935
Mobile 9,658 84.37% 1,710 14.94% 61 0.53% 18 0.16% 0 0.00% 7,948 69.43% 11,447
Monroe 1,972 96.52% 66 3.23% 3 0.15% 2 0.10% 0 0.00% 1,906 93.29% 2,043
Montgomery 10,066 95.57% 441 4.19% 18 0.17% 8 0.08% 0 0.00% 9,625 91.38% 10,533
Morgan 4,896 86.62% 656 11.61% 31 0.55% 69 1.22% 0 0.00% 4,240 75.02% 5,652
Perry 1,382 95.05% 37 2.54% 2 0.14% 33 2.27% 0 0.00% 1,345 92.50% 1,454
Pickens 1,479 87.10% 128 7.54% 9 0.53% 82 4.83% 0 0.00% 1,351 79.56% 1,698
Pike 2,545 97.92% 52 2.00% 1 0.04% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 2,493 95.92% 2,599
Randolph 2,227 74.09% 767 25.52% 10 0.33% 2 0.07% 0 0.00% 1,460 48.57% 3,006
Russell 1,894 97.28% 46 2.36% 5 0.26% 2 0.10% 0 0.00% 1,848 94.92% 1,947
Shelby 2,365 72.48% 864 26.48% 33 1.01% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 1,501 46.00% 3,263
St. Clair 2,185 59.46% 1,449 39.43% 38 1.03% 3 0.08% 0 0.00% 736 20.03% 3,675
Sumter 1,293 98.03% 26 1.97% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,267 96.06% 1,319
Talladega 3,353 84.33% 617 15.52% 4 0.10% 2 0.05% 0 0.00% 2,736 68.81% 3,976
Tallapoosa 3,391 95.87% 138 3.90% 6 0.17% 2 0.06% 0 0.00% 3,253 91.97% 3,537
Tuscaloosa 5,322 94.08% 302 5.34% 28 0.49% 4 0.07% 1 0.02% 5,020 88.74% 5,657
Walker 4,734 74.31% 1,583 24.85% 44 0.69% 10 0.16% 0 0.00% 3,151 49.46% 6,371
Washington 1,307 94.10% 81 5.83% 1 0.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,226 88.26% 1,389
Wilcox 1,358 98.33% 23 1.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,335 96.67% 1,381
Winston 1,006 49.83% 1,005 49.78% 7 0.35% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1 0.05% 2,019
Totals207,91084.76%34,67514.14%2,0300.83%6750.28%130.01%173,23570.62%245,303

Notes

  1. In this county where Foster ran second ahead of Hoover, margin given is Roosevelt vote minus Foster vote and percentage margin Roosevelt percentage minus Foster percentage.
  2. In this county where Thomas ran second ahead of Hoover, margin given is Roosevelt vote minus Thomas vote and percentage margin Roosevelt percentage minus Thomas percentage.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.