Zoltán Dörnyei

Zoltán Dörnyei (Hungarian pronunciation: [ˈzoltaːn ˈdørɲɛi]) (born 1960) is a Hungarian-born British linguist. He is a professor of psycholinguistics at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom.[1][2] He is known for his work on second language acquisition and the psychology of the language learner, in particular on motivation in second language learning, having published numerous books and papers on these topics.[3][4]

The native form of this personal name is Dörnyei Zoltán. This article uses Western name order when mentioning individuals.
Zoltán Dörnyei
Born (1960-03-11) 11 March 1960
Budapest, Hungary
Alma mater
Known for
  • L2 Motivational Self System
  • Directed Motivational Currents
Awards
Scientific career
Fields
Institutions
ThesisPsycholinguistic factors in foreign language learning (1989)
Doctoral studentsJudit Kormos
WebsiteDörnyei on the website of the University of Nottingham

Career

Education

Dörnyei obtained a combined Master of Arts degree in English language and literature and in art history in 1985 at the Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest, Hungary. His dissertation was entitled Art dealing in Hungary before 1945.

In 1989 he received a PhD degree in Psycholinguistics at the Eötvös Loránd University and his thesis was entitled Psycholinguistic factors in foreign language learning.

In 2003 he earned a D.Sc. in Linguistics at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Between 2008 and 2010 he conducted part-time undergraduate studies in Theology at St John's College, Nottingham.

In 2011 he obtained an MA degree in Theology and Religious Studies at the Department of Theology of the University of Nottingham. The title of his dissertation was Transfiguration, beauty and biblical interpretation. In 2017 he received a Ph.D. degree in Theology at the Department of Theology and Religion of Durham University. The title of his thesis was Progressive creation and the struggles of humankind in the Bible: An experiment in canonical narrative interpretation.

Teaching

He began his career at the School of English and American Studies at Eötvös Loránd University in 1988. In 1998, he moved to the United Kingdom and after two years at Thames Valley University, London, he took up a position at the School of English, University of Nottingham, where he is currently Professor of Psycholinguistics.[5][3]

Research

Process-Oriented Model of Motivation

Dörnyei’s theory of motivation is the idea that motivation is developed in a unique and dynamic way that is necessary to gain success in areas where prolonged learning is required.[2] The process-oriented model of motivation seeks to explain Dörnyei’s theory through student motivation by focusing on (a) motivational maintenance and volition, and (b) motivational evolution and fluctuation.[2] This model shifts the emphasis from the historic assumptions of pre-actional ‘choice motivation’ to volitional/executive aspects of goal attainment during the actional phrase.[2] This model is rooted in the assumption that people unconsciously monitor their motivation and make adjustments or choices to increase or decrease motivation based on the outcome of their current goals.[2] The first dimension of the behavioural process indicates a motivational influence (wishes, hopes, and desires).[6]These influences indicate a starting point for the motivational process and are directly linked to the preactional phase. [6]The preactional phase is a very high paced process, where an individual cycles through wishes, hopes, and desires to get to a point of action.[6] The second dimension of the behavioural process indicates that the initial motivational influences have  progressed  into goal, which ultimately lead to intention and action.[6] The actional phase is where the energy to have continued motivation comes from that will support the behavioural process. The final dimension found in the figure of motivational influences is the post actional phase.[6] Within this phase the goal is evaluated and assessed and further steps will be made to adjust behaviours to achieve goals or the goal will be abandoned.[6]

The Principled Communicative Approach

The principled communicative approach bridges the gap between previous language teaching methods like communicative language teaching and recent research.[7] Using current research, PCA attempts to extend the communicative approach by focusing on the explicit development of other knowledge areas and skills necessary for efficient communication instead of focusing solely on the systematic components of languages that language teachers traditionally focused on.[7] The PCA focuses on three main areas including focus on form and form-focused instruction, fluency and automatization and formulaic language.[7] Each aspect is to ensure meaningful communication with relevant and useful input of both linguistic rules and lexical terms.[7]

Seven Key points for PCA:[7]

1.     The Personal significance principle: The material needs to focus on meaning and it must be classified as significant to the language learner.[7] An example of this would be having language students fill out a check for an item they would like to buy.[7]

2.     The Controlled Practice Principle: Practice activities should be controlled and promote automatization of skills found in the target language.[7] Language learners should be given the framework to practice forms and skills of the target language.[7]

3.     Formulaic Language Principle: Selected phrases and practices that are significant to the target language should be intensively practiced and recycled.[7] Language learners should have a significant amount of opportunities to use specific important phrases of target language.[7]

4.     Language Exposure Principle: Learners should have access to a large amount of target language input to feed the learners implicit learning mechanisms.[7] Language learners should be exposed to many different inputs that cover the four main categories (reading, writing, speaking, and listening).[7]

5.     The Focused Interaction Principle: Language learners should interact with target language in a genuine context.[7] Full exposure to language is required for mastery of language. Students in a language classroom tend to have very structured classes which often do not allow for the development of spontaneous speech.[7] Natural interaction is required to ensure mastery.[7]

Group Dynamics

Dörnyei studied the impact of group dynamics on second language learning.[3] He found that group psychology can shape a learner's behavior as well as their motivation to learn.[3] The way that learners feel when they are in a classroom group can influence the effort they put into learning.[8]

Group cohesiveness, group norms and group roles play a central role in creating motivated learning communities.[3]

Group Cohesiveness and Interpersonal Relationships

A group's cohesiveness is determined by the quality of the relationships between group members combined with an accepting classroom community.[9] Other contributing factors to group cohesiveness include a group's common purpose and group pride.[9] Cohesive groups interact and share personal information, participating actively in conversations essential for second language acquisition.[10] They perform better and are more productive than non-cohesive groups.[8] Dörnyei suggests many ways teachers can create group cohesiveness in a second language learning classroom including, but not limited to:

1. Learning about each other - The more personal information students share, the more acceptance will exist between classmates.[9]

2. Proximity, contact and interaction - When designing their classrooms and learning tasks, teachers should consider students' physical closeness in their seating plans.[9] The way desks are arranged and how a classroom is personalized has an impact on students' ownership and engagement with the learning environment.[8] Students who are seated in groups are more likely to talk and form personal relationships.[10] Group cohesiveness is improved by providing time to interact during in-class group work as well as including opportunities for students to collaborate on independent group projects.[9]

3. Rewarding and enjoyable group activities - Rewards can be the joy of performing certain activities, success in achieving goals, or more tangible rewards, such as grades or prizes.[9]

4. Extracurricular activities - Experiences shared outside of the classroom allow students to see each other as real people, not just classmates. These positive feelings, memories and shared experiences are brought back to the classroom, building group cohesiveness.[9]

5. Group competitions - Games played with different teams encourage friendly competition within a classroom which can boost group cohesiveness as students unite to win.[9]

6. Sharing a common goal - When a class collaborates to achieve a common goal, group cohesiveness is strengthened.[9]

7. Teacher role modelling - If a teacher is positive, encouraging, friendly and accepting, students are more likely to demonstrate the same behaviors.[9]

Group Norms and Group Roles

Rules and routines help groups function smoothly and effectively.[9] When rules are agreed upon and shared by a group these behaviors are known as group norms.[9] When certain people carry out specific tasks or functions these are known as group roles.[9]

Group Norms

Group norms can be applied explicitly by the teacher or school, or can develop implicitly as an unspoken, agreed upon code of conduct.[9] Studies have shown that positive group norms can have a significant impact a students' motivation and academic achievement.[9] Unstated negative group norms, such as the acceptance and promotion of mediocrity, can adversely impact a group's success.[9] Students in this situation suffer socially if their goal is to succeed academically.[10] Positive group norms, such as tolerance and acceptance of errors as part of learning, enhance student morale and strengthen group cohesiveness.[9] Students perform well to uphold their responsibility to the group, and support their classmates to achieve academic excellence.[10] If group norms are agreed upon and internalized, the group itself will often assume responsibility for dealing with wayward members who violate the norms.[8]

Group Roles

Roles are shared expectations of a person's purpose in a group.[9] If constructive roles are assigned that complement each student's strengths and interests, the group will function more effectively.[9] Individuals will benefit in terms of confidence and self-image.[9] If roles are assigned that do not complement group members, group cohesion may suffer and lead to conflict.[9] Student roles may emerge naturally, be assigned by the teacher, or be encouraged and reinforced based on classroom observation of student behavior.[9]

Teachers' Leadership Styles and Group Dynamics

Language teachers are group leaders.[9] A group's character and dedication to common goals will often follow that of the teacher's.[8]  Positive group dynamics can strengthen the stamina needed to learn a second language.[8] Although there are many leadership styles, studies have found that a democratic style of leadership promotes group cohesion, friendly communication and positive interpersonal relationships.[9] A democratic leadership style involves sharing leadership roles with students by involving them in some of the decision-making processes about how the group will function.[9] A democratic approach to the teacher/leader style leads to more of a facilitator role in educational settings.[9] The teacher provides the right conditions for the group to cooperate and develop cohesiveness.[10] The degree of guidance a teacher provides will change depending on a group's level of maturity and their development towards self-direction in their learning.[9]

The teachers role in motivation

Language teachers have a major role to play in creating and enhancing the motivational aspects of a second language learning classroom.[9] Classroom motivation levels are influenced by a teacher's motivational teaching practice.[9] There are practical and deliberate strategies a teacher can use to promote student motivation once group cohesiveness and positive interpersonal relationships have been established.[9]

Generating Initial Motivation

There is no guarantee that students will be motivated to learn a second language, and often the opposite is true.[9] Teachers need to generate enthusiasm and share the benefits of learning a second language to promote positive student attitudes.[9] They need to create a safe and accepting space for students to learn.[8] Dörnyei suggests five ways a teacher can build initial motivation in second language learning: (1) promoting language-related values and the benefits of knowing a second language; (2) increasing the expectancy of success; (3) encouraging goal setting; (4) ensuring teaching materials are relevant to learners; and (5) establishing realistic learner beliefs about second language learning.[9]

Maintaining and Protecting Motivation

Once initial motivation has been activated, it is important for teachers to keep students focused on their goals and engaged in stimulating and enjoyable learning activities.[9] Tasks should be motivating and learners' self-esteem and confidence protected, as there will be many distractions, and commitment to self-established goals may diminish.[9] Learning a second language is a long-term endeavor and motivation must be maintained for continued learning to take place.[9]

Encouraging Positive Retrospective Self-Evaluation

Research has shown that how learners feel about their past learning achievements has a significant impact on their attitude towards current learning challenges and goals.[9] Teachers can help students re-evaluate previous disappointments with their L2 learning in a more constructive way, building self-confidence, increasing learning satisfaction and leading to self-reflection regarding areas that need improvement.[9] They can highlight students' progress and successes, reinforce the importance of effort over ability and provide supportive and motivating feedback.[9]

L2 Motivational Self System

Dörnyei believes that acquiring a second language entails more than just learning another academic subject, it involves a learner's whole being.[3] A new dimension is added to their identity, their second language speaking self.[3] Building on the work of  psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius (1986) and their article Possible Selves https://cursa.ihmc.us/rid=1LQJK1Z9J-16LFNTG-39MK/Possible%20Selves%20ARTICLE.pdf, Dörnyei developed the L2 Motivational Self System framework.[9] He was interested in the concept of mental imagery, a person's vision of their second language speaking self as a powerful motivator, the fuel required to sustain the ups and downs, and sometimes tiresome journey, towards second language acquisition.[11]

The L2 Motivational Self System is composed of three parts:

1. The Ideal L2 Self  - This is the learner's image of their future L2 speaking self, the second language speaker they aspire to become.[11] This image motivates the L2 learner as they work towards reducing the difference between their actual self and their ideal self.[11]

2. The Ought-to L2 Self - This is the learner's image of what future qualities they ought to possess to prevent negative outcomes, involving duties, expectations and responsibilities imposed externally by others.[11]

3. The L2 learning experience - This  involves the immediate motivating and enjoyable elements in the actual L2 learning environment.[11]

In order for the Ideal L2 Self to act as a powerful motivator, the learner must have a strong and detailed vision of themselves as an L2 speaker.[11]  Their Ideal L2 Self must be within reason and should not vary too drastically from their Ought-to Self and its associated external social pressures.[11]  The Ideal L2 Self must have an action plan - tasks and strategies developed to reach their goal.[11] Also important, is a clear picture of  their Feared Self, the negative consequences that will result if their Ideal L2 self is not realized.[11]

Many research studies have been conducted that support the relationship between an Ideal L2 Self with motivated learning behavior.[12] The Ought-to self, while being a facet of the L2 learning experience, and being perceived by students as important, is less of a motivating factor and predictor of L2 learning success.[12] The juxtaposition of the Ideal L2 Self with the Feared Self has been found to be highly motivating.[11]

An engaging and enjoyable L2 classroom, where effective motivation techniques are utilized by teachers, is often the strongest predictor of motivated language learning behaviors.[13][12] Teachers can help learners realize their Ideal L2 self by raising self-awareness and enhancing the vivacity of students' L2  images, dreams and desires.[11] Creative and guided imagery can be used in class to strengthen the Ideal L2 Self.[11]

Directed Motivational Currents

Dörnyei argues that motivation is not static or constant, it is not something you either have or don't have, a person is not either motivated or unmotivated.[14] Rather, motivation ebbs and flows, depending on many factors including the day, the topic, or the context, constantly changing over time.[14] Vision, according to Dörnyei, is the highest-order of motivation, a goal combined with an imagined future reality, capable of overcoming these natural ebbs and flows, transforming action and engagement into long term effort.[14]

Directed motivational currents (DMCs) are intense and enduring motivational pathways, surges of energy people experience when pursuing a personal goal or vision.[15] These Directed Motivational Currents spur focused and sustained action and are energy-producing, not energy-draining.[3] People find themselves not just motivated to achieve a goal, but driven to do so, imagining a desired future reality.[14][15] A DMC combines visions with motivated focused action, sequences of strategic behavior designed to move visions from daydreams to targeted accomplishments.[14][15] The DMC, combined with tangible achievement of sub-goals, propels a learner forward, maintaining momentum.[14]

Sometimes a person's vision for themselves can lay dormant for many years, waiting for the right set of circumstances to present themselves, a turning point in their lives.[14] DMCs have a definite trigger, a starting point that activates the active pursuit of an imagined reality, where an attainable structured pathway to the goal is formed and put in place.[14] Once a DMC is activated, everything in a person's life is focused on achieving the goal.[14] There is an urgency to DMCs, an intensity, a shift in routines.[16] DMCs take on a life of their own, they create an all-consuming preoccupation, a momentum that propels a person towards the attainment of their goal.[15]  Other things in their lives may have to change, or take a backseat, in order to accommodate the DMC.[15]

The main components of a Directed Motivational Current are: (1) A vision directed towards achieving an end goal;  (2) A clear starting point, or triggering event, activated by something specific, either cognitive or contextual, with new structural routines and procedures established to reach a goal; (3) Perceived personal ownership of the goal and control over its progress; (4) Progress towards the goal must be evident, providing continued momentum;  and (5) Positive emotions experienced with the achievement of necessary sub-goals transporting a person closer to their final goal in an energizing and self-propelling motivational stream.[16][15]

In second language classrooms, long-term effort and sustained motivation is essential for achievement.[14] The goal of language teachers then, who often struggle to initiate and maintain motivation in students, would be to inspire and lead learners, or groups of learners, to imagine, activate and realize Directed Motivational Currents in their second language learning journey.[14][15]

To create a vision-inspired second language learning environment where students' Directed Motivational Currents may emerge and are nurtured, Dörnyei suggests the following:

1. Help students create the image of their Ideal L2 self.[16]

2. Strengthen the vision through imagery practice, clarifying details and intensifying urgency.[16]

3. Support the vision with realistic expectations.[16]

4. Help students transform their visions into a plan of action.[16]

5.  Keep the vision alive. Don't let it get pushed aside. Activate it regularly.[16]

6. Refer back to a student's Feared Self, the self that will result if their vision is not attained.[16]

Current Research

Recently, Dörnyei has focused his research on Theology and biblical interpretation as he recently completed a Ph.D in Theology with the department of Theology and Religion at Durham University.[4] Dornyei’s most recent research in applied linguistics and motivation has continued to focus on motivation.[4] More specifically on motivational strategies for second language learners.[4] In his most recent article it was identified that there is more benefit for language learners who have access to deeper engagement with materials that include mental imagery.[17] This research study used 150 intermediate students from nine different English as a foreign language (EFL) classes.[17] These students were then divided into three groups; Motivational, visionary, and control.[17] These groups were tested with a 56 formulaic sequence, and their outcome on the test was assessed by a multiple-choice vocabulary test.[17] These assessments were created to directly assess the students’ ability to recognize the form of the target sequence.[17] The result of this study indicates that there are deeper engagement levels associated with mental imagery when it is corroborated by a delayed posttest.[17]

Academic Awards
  • 1994: Gombócz Zoltán Award of the Hungarian Association of Linguists
  • 1998: Distinguished Research Award of the American TESOL Organization (co-author: Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig)
  • 1999: Kenneth W. Mildenberger Prize of the Modern Language Association[18]
  • 2006: ILTA Best Paper Award[19]
  • 2010: Ben Warren International House Trust Prize
  • 2011: Henry Osborn Award of Cornerstone University, USA
  • 2014: Highly Commended Award of the English-Speaking Union's HRH The Duke of Edinburgh English Language Book Awards

Main Monographs
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. London: Routledge.
  • Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Vision, mental imagery and the Christian life: Insights from science and Scripture. London: Routledge.
  • Dörnyei, Z (2018). Progressive creation and humanity’s struggles in the Bible: A canonical narrative interpretation. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
  • Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & Muir, C. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused interventions. New York: Routledge.
  • Dörnyei. Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.
  • Dörnyei. Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (Eds.) (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dörnyei. Z., & Kubanyiova, M. (2014). Motivating students, motivating teachers: Building vision in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wong, M. S., Kristjánsson, C., & Dörnyei, Z. (Eds.). (2013). Christian faith and English language teaching and learning: Research on the interrelationship of religion and ELT. New York: Routledge.
  • Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ehrman, M., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Interpersonal dynamics in second language education: The visible and invisible classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

References
  1. Kormos, J. (2013). Dörnyei, Zoltán. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (on-line). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  2. Dörnyei, Zoltán (December 2000). "Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation". British Journal of Educational Psychology. 70 (4): 519–538. doi:10.1348/000709900158281.
  3. Dörnyei, Z. (2016). From English language teaching to psycholinguistics: A story of three decades. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Becoming and being an applied linguist: The life histories of some applied linguists (pp. 119-135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  4. http://www.zoltandornyei.co.uk/
  5. "Official University website for Zoltán Dörnyei".
  6. Dörnyei, Zoltán (2009-12-31), "18. Motivation, Language Identities and the L2 Self: Future Research Directions", Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters, pp. 350–356, ISBN 978-1-84769-129-3, retrieved 2020-12-02
  7. Celce-Murcia, Marianne; Dörnyei, Zoltán; Thurrell, Sarah; Dornyei, Zoltan (1997). "Direct Approaches in L2 Instruction: A Turning Point in Communicative Language Teaching?". TESOL Quarterly. 31 (1): 141. doi:10.2307/3587979.
  8. Dörnyei, Zoltán; Malderez, Angi (1997-03-01). "Group dynamics and foreign language teaching". System. 25 (1): 65–81. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00061-9. ISSN 0346-251X.
  9. Cummins, Jim; Davison, Chris, eds. (2007). International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Boston, MA: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8. ISBN 978-0-387-46300-1.
  10. Dornyei, Zoltan (1997). "Psychological Processes in Cooperative Language Learning: Group Dynamics and Motivation". The Modern Language Journal. 81 (4): 482. doi:10.2307/328891.
  11. Dörnyei, Zoltán (2009-12-31), "18. Motivation, Language Identities and the L2 Self: Future Research Directions", Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters, pp. 350–356, ISBN 978-1-84769-129-3, retrieved 2020-11-22
  12. Dörnyei, Zoltán; Chan, Letty (2013). "Motivation and Vision: An Analysis of Future L2 Self Images, Sensory Styles, and Imagery Capacity Across Two Target Languages". Language Learning. 63 (3): 437–462. doi:10.1111/lang.12005. ISSN 1467-9922.
  13. Dörnyei, Zoltán (2019-03-22). "Towards a better understanding of the L2 Learning Experience, the Cinderella of the L2 Motivational Self System". Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 9 (1): 19–30. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.1.2. ISSN 2084-1965.
  14. "Directed Motivational Currents: Using vision to create effective motivational pathways | Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching". doi:10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.3.3. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. HENRY, ALASTAIR; DAVYDENKO, SOFIA; DÖRNYEI, ZOLTÁN (2015). "The Anatomy of Directed Motivational Currents: Exploring Intense and Enduring Periods of L2 Motivation". The Modern Language Journal. 99 (2): 329–345. ISSN 0026-7902.
  16. "Motivation and Foreign Language Learning: From theory to practice". www.jbe-platform.com. 2014-07-15. doi:10.1075/lllt.40. Retrieved 2020-11-19.
  17. Le-Thi, Duyen; Dörnyei, Zoltán; Pellicer-Sánchez, Ana (2020-06-05). "Increasing the effectiveness of teaching L2 formulaic sequences through motivational strategies and mental imagery: A classroom experiment". Language Teaching Research: 136216882091312. doi:10.1177/1362168820913125. ISSN 1362-1688.
  18. "Kenneth W. Mildenberger Prize Winners". Modern Language Association. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  19. "2006 ILTA Best Paper Award". International Language Testing Association. 2 July 2006.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.