Sripuranthan Natarajan Idol

The Sripuranthan Natarajan Idol, is a 900-year-old statue of Natarajan — the dancing Shiva — that was stolen from the ancient Brihadeeswarar temple of Sripuranthan, smuggled to the United States, and then sold to the National Gallery of Australia, Canberra with a false provenance, for US$5.1 million. The statue was consequently returned by Australia to the Indian government on ethical grounds, once questions were raised on due diligence not being followed during the acquisition.[1]

Sripuranthan Natarajar
Year10th Century CE
TypeChola Bronze
MediumBronze
SubjectNatarajar, the Dancing Shiva
Dimensions130 cm (51 in)
LocationStolen from the Brihadeeswarar Temple, Sripuranthan Village, Tamil Nadu
OwnerArchaeological Survey of India, Government of India

Nataraja
Main article: Nataraja

Nataraja (Tamil: "நடராசர்" or Kooththan "கூத்தன்; The Lord (or King) of Dance) is a depiction of the Hindu God Shiva as the cosmic dancer who performs his divine dance to destroy a weary universe and make preparations for the god Brahma to start the process of creation. The dance of Shiva in Tillai, the traditional name for Chidambaram, forms the motif for all the depictions of Shiva as Nataraja. He is also known as "Sabesan" which splits as "Sabayil aadum eesan" in Tamil which means "The Lord who dances on the dais". The form is present in most Shiva temples in South India and is the prime deity in the famous Thillai Nataraja Temple at Chidambaram.[2] The sculpture is usually made in bronze, with Shiva dancing in an aureole of flames, lifting his left leg (in rare cases, the right leg) and balancing over a demon or dwarf (Muyalaka) who symbolizes ignorance. It is a well-known sculptural symbol in India and popularly used as a symbol of Indian culture.[3]

Background

The Udayarpalayam taluk of the Ariyalur District, in Tamil Nadu, India has nearly 463 ancient temples, of which 200 belong to the Chola period dated 9th to 10th century AD. Most of these temples haven't seen maintenance for many decades and have lax security. Local thieves used to target the idols for their metal content, usually melting them. Some idols are pure gold, silver and panchaloha — five precious metals. However, the entry of international smuggling cartels has changed the situation. With antique Chola art being worth millions in the international market, idol thieves were recruited to lift them from the temples. In 2008, one such gang allegedly recruited by New York-based art dealer Subhash Kapoor was responsible for stealing eight idols from the Brihadeeswarar temple at Sripuranthan, 18 idols from the Varadharaja Perumal temple, and in 2010, 6 panchaloha idols from Chozeeshwarar temple at Vikiramangalam.[4]

Subhash Kapoor
Main article: Subhash Kapoor (art dealer)

Subhash Kapoor owned an upscale Indian art dealership called 'Art of the Past' in Manhattan, USA. Across the years, he had built a good working relationship with international art galleries, as a reputable dealer of Indian antiques. Following accusations of illegal dealing, Kapoor's gallery was raided by Homeland Security and stolen artwork worth 100 million was seized. Subhash Kapoor was arrested in Germany and extradited to India to face trial. As of 2016 He is lodged at the Puzhal Central Prison in Tamil Nadu, India,[5] facing charges for criminal conspiracy to stealing antique idols which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years. Kapoor protests his innocence and believes that he has been framed.[6][7][8]

Idol theft from Sripuranthan

According to the Art investigative website, Chasing Aphrodite, Kapoor traveled to India and met Sanjivi Asokan, a kingpin of a ring of idol thieves. In 2006, thieves were hired for US$12,000 for stealing eight idols — Nataraja and Uma Mashewari, Vinayagar, Devi, Deepalaksmi, Chandrashekarar, Sampanthar and Krishnar — from the dilapidated Brihadeeswarar temple at Sripuranthan. Worship at the temple had ended a long time before, as it was plagued by scorpions and poisonous bugs; it was locked and had fallen into ruins. The theft occurred on three occasions starting in January 2006, with the thieves carefully gluing back the lock, using a lorry (truck) parked on the dry river bed behind the temple as the getaway vehicle. Soon after the theft, pictures of the stolen idols were sent to Kapoor in October 2006. The idols were mixed with new replicas to fool customs officials, and exported out of India by a company called Ever Star International Services Inc. to New York, where it was received by Nimbus Imports Exports, a company owned by Kapoor. Soon after Kapoor obtained a certificate from the Art Loss Register (ALR) stating that the Nataraja idol was not on the stolen artefacts register.

At this point, the ALR had no information on the stolen Nataraja, as the theft of the idols was discovered by the villagers only in 2008. The discovery was when officials of the Archaeological Survey of India, Government of India arrived in the village for removing the idols from the temple for safekeeping, when the glued lock and missing idols were discovered. A First Information Report (FIR 133/2008) was filed at the Vikramangalam Police Station in this regard. The Economic Offenses Wing of the Tamil Nadu Police released pictures of the missing idols on its website.[9][10][11][12][13]

The National Gallery of Australia (NGA) was keen to enhance its collection of Indian art. In 2008, the NGA, under Ron Radford, director and Robyn Maxwell, senior curator Asian art, acquired the dancing Shiva from Subhash Kapoor. The provenance provided stated that the idol was sold by Raj Mehgoub of Grand Central Parkway to Subhash Kapoor. Further, it was claimed the idol was acquired in New Delhi in 1970 (a year before the Indian government banned the export of antiquities from India), by Raj's late husband Abdullah Mehgoub, who was a Sudanese diplomat serving in India between 1968 and 1971. A sales receipt dated 15 April 1970, issued by Uttam Singh & Sons, Jama Masjid, Delhi, to Abdulla Mehgoub of Defence Colony, New Delhi was produced as part of the provenance. US$5.1 million was paid by the National Gallery of Australia for the idol.[7][14][15]

Theft exposed

The investigative website Chasing Aphrodite was the first to expose that the Shiva idol acquired by the NGA was a stolen artwork from Southern India. The story was picked up by Australian and Indian news agencies and widely reported. New York Police recovered pictures of the idol from Kapoor's house, where it appeared in a contemporary Indian house environment, discounting the claim that the idol has been outside India since 1971. Records of the idol had been maintained at the French Institute of Pondicherry, with three photo records from different periods. Further, a 75-year-old farmer, Govindarajan, had a 30-year-old picture of Natarajan and his consort, which was taken by a photographer from Kumbakonam. Using this information, The Hindu newspaper ran an article comparing photos — a photo of the Sripuranthan Natarajar idol from the French Institute of Pondicherry taken in 1994, photos of the idol recovered by New York Police during the raid of Kapoor's house, and the photo of the idol displayed at the National Gallery of Australia. It concluded all the photos were of the same idol, showing seven similarities

  • 27 flames around the circle
  • Left leg pointing between the 3rd and 4th flame
  • Waist cloth of shiva merged with the 23rd and 24th flame
  • 3rd flame slightly damaged
  • 12th and 13th flame damaged
  • 17th flame damaged
  • Flowing hair damaged

However, the National Gallery of Australia, continued to deny that the artwork was stolen, refused to return it, and continued to display it in the gallery, without any note of its doubtful provenance. This stand was criticised by the Australian media, with Duncan Chappell, criminology expert from University of Sydney, calling it inappropriate and an international embarrassment. The Government of India formally requested the artwork to be returned, under the UNESCO convention on stolen antiquities.[7][16][17][18]

Investigative site Poetry in Stone published a list of stories named as the 'Kapoor Files', showing that several of the stolen idols stolen from Sripuranthan and Suthamalli had appeared in consecutive 'Art of the Past' catalogues. The site compared the photos published in the Kapoor catalogs with the photos of the stolen idols as recorded by the French Institute of Pondicherry and pointed out the similarities.[19]

Return to India

In March 2014, Ron Radford, the director of the National Gallery of Australia, removed the idol from display. In September 2014, the Australian government returned the Natarajan idol to India, along with another stolen antique idol of Shiva as Ardhanarishvarar which was displayed at the Art Gallery of New South Wales. The two were handed over by the then Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 5 September 2014, at New Delhi.

The Nataraja idol was then moved to Madras and stored in the safe room of the Archaeological Survey of India office at Fort St. George, before being produced before the judicial magistrates of Jayamkondam and Vridhachalam.[20][21][22]

In November 2014, the Nataraja idol was paraded on the streets of Sripuranthan, under tight security. It was temporarily placed in its original damp stone altar. However, officials made it clear that the statue would be displayed at the government museum at Kumbakonam and will be brought into Sripuranthan for annual festivities. The consort of Nataraja was traced to the Asian Civilisation Museum at Singapore, and the Government of Singapore agreed for its return to India.

Overall four of the eight statues stolen from Sripuranthan were traced, with three to the United States and one to Singapore.[6][23][24]

In March 2016, the Natarajan idol was re-united with its consort Uma Parmeshwari, at the ASI Icon Centre, Kumbakonam, after nearly 8 years. The Singapore Civilisation Museum had finally returned the Uma Parmeshwari after long negotiations with the Indian Government.[25]

Consequences

Subhash Kapoor's arrest alarmed museums all over the world, as they started investigating their purchases from his gallery. The Linden Museum in Germany returned to the Indian government a 9th-century AD idol of Mahishasumardini, stolen from Pulwama district in Jammu and Kashmir in the 1990s, which had been acquired from Kapoor. The Toledo Museum of Art in Ohio returned four artifacts acquired from Kapoor, including the Vinayagar statue stolen from Sripuranthan. The other antiques are a stone idol of Varaha Rescuing the Earth (acquired 2001), Mughal origin 18th-century enamel with gold box (acquired 2008), and a watercolour Rasikapriya from the Samdehi Ragini (acquired 2010).[26][27][28][29]

In November 2015, the United States returned a chola period bronze of Shivan and Parvathi, which was sold to the David Owsley Museum of Art at the Ball State University in 2005 by Subhash Kapoor. Here also, the sculpture was sold with a false provenance which placed it back to an American collection of Leo Figie, dated to 1969. The idol was recovered by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).[30]

In June 2016, the United States returned nearly 200 antiques to the Indian Government, in the presence of the visiting Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi at Washington DC. Among the antiques returned were the Chola period (850 AD to 1250 AD) bronze of the Tamil Shaivite poet Manikkavacakar stolen from the Sivan Temple in Madras and the 1000 year old Sripuranthan Vinayagar which was displayed at the Toledo Museum of Art.[31]

References
  1. Mariappan, Julie (11 September 2014). "Stolen Nataraja, Ardhanariswara idols return to the land of temples". The Times of India (Chennai). Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  2. Coomaraswamy, Ananda Kentish (1918). The dance of Siva; fourteen Indian essays. New York: The Sunrise Turn Inc. p. 58. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  3. Kumar, Nitin (January 2001). "Shiva as Nataraja - Dance and Destruction In Indian Art". Exotic India. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  4. Ezhilarasan, K (21 July 2012). "God's guards missing in action". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  5. Arunchalam, Pon Vasanth. "Subhash Kapoor remanded in Pazhavoor idol theft case". The Hindu.
  6. "Stolen idol of Goddess Uma Maheswari to return from Singapore" (Chennai). Deccan Chronicle. 15 June 2015. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  7. McDermott, Quentin; Richards, Deborah (25 March 2014). "The Dancing Shiva". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  8. "Subhash Chandra Kapoor vs. Inspector Of Police" (PDF). Toledo Museum of Art. 3 April 2012. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  9. Felch, Jason (4 June 2013). "SCOOP: New Evidence Of Stolen Idols at the National Gallery of Australia". Chasing Aphrodite: The Hunt for Looted Antiquities in the World's Museums. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  10. Boland, Michaela; Hodge, Amanda (8 March 2014). "Town prays for its stolen god Shiva to return". The Australian. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  11. Datta, Damayanti (11 April 2014). "Mystery of the missing Gods". India Today. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  12. "Photocopies of Antique Metal Idols Stolen from Sivan Temple at Sripuranthan Village at Ariyalur District in Tamil Nadu" (PDF). Tamil Nadu Police: Economic Offences Wing. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  13. Pradeep (14 April 2014). "Mystery of the missing 1000 yr old Gods in INDIA - Traced to USA and Australian National Gallery Of Art". Decoding Hinduism. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
  14. Morgan, Joyce (15 March 2014). "Is the NGA's 'looted' Shiva a statue of naivety?". The Saturday Paper. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  15. Felch, Jason (10 March 2014). "UPDATED > Radford Speaks, RETIRES: Director of Australia's National Gallery Is In Denial". Chasing Aphrodite: The Hunt for Looted Antiquities in the World's Museums. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  16. Srivathsan, A (9 March 2014). "Claim flawed, Australian gallery is keeping stolen idol". The Hindu (Chennai). Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  17. Kleinman, Rachel; Dhillon, Amrit (18 March 2014). "The National Gallery of Australia dances into trouble with Shiva". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  18. Poetry in Stone (11 March 2014). "The Return of the Dancer". Youtube. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  19. Vijay. "Poetry In Stone". Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  20. Bourke, Latika (5 September 2014). "Dancing Shiva to be returned during Abbott's India visit". The Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax Media. Archived from the original on 1 April 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  21. Thomsen, Simon (5 September 2014). "Australian PM Tony Abbott Returns National Gallery's $6 Million Stolen Shiva Sculpture To India". Business Insider Australia. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  22. "Two idols brought back from Australia, now in Chennai". The Hindu (Chennai). 12 September 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  23. Hodge, Amanda (10 November 2014). "Tamil Nadu village turns out to welcome home Dancing Shiva". The Australian. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  24. "Four stolen idols traced". The Hindu (Ariyalur). 18 September 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  25. "In icon centre, Uma Parmeshwari reunites with Nataraja after 8 years". Deccan Chronicle. 2 March 2016. Retrieved 8 June 2016.
  26. Nair, Sobhana K (18 September 2015). "Germany to return 9th Century Idol". Bangalore Mirror. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  27. "US museum to return Ganesha idol stolen from TN by Kapoor". The Times of India. 29 September 2015. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  28. "Toledo Museum of Art to Return Ganesha Sculpture to India". Toledo Museum of Art. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  29. "Kapoor Acquisitions". Toledo Museum of Art. Archived from the original on 29 September 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  30. "US to return stolen Chola era Shiva Parvati idol to India". The Hindu. 20 November 2015. Retrieved 8 June 2016.
  31. "US returns over 200 artifacts worth more than $100 million to India". The Indian Express. Retrieved 8 June 2016.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.