Art Loss Register

Art Loss Register (ALR) is the world's largest database of stolen art.[1] A computerized international database that captures information about lost and stolen art, antiques, and collectibles, the ALR is a London-based, independent, for-profit corporate offspring of the New York-based, nonprofit International Foundation for Art Research (IFAR).[2] The range of functions served by ALR has grown as the number of its listed items has increased. The database is used by collectors, the art trade, insurers, and law enforcement agencies worldwide.[3] In 1991, IFAR helped create the Art Loss Register (ALR) as a commercial enterprise to expand and market the database. IFAR managed ALR's U.S. operations through 1997. In 1998 the ALR assumed full responsibility for the IFAR database although IFAR retains ownership.[4] In 1992, the database comprised only 20,000 items, but it grew in size nearly tenfold during its first decade.[5][6]

History

The first steps towards ALR began with the establishment of IFAR in New York in 1969.[7]

Among other explicit goals, IFAR was created to compile information about stolen art.[8] In response to the growth of international art thefts, IFAR began publishing the "Stolen Art Alert" in 1976.

By 1990, IFAR was updating its catalogue of stolen art 10 times a year.[8] The magnitude of the problem overwhelmed what had grown to be over 20,000 manual records. While IFAR had been very successful in recording the details of losses, that was only a good first step.

In 1991, the ALR was established in London as a commercial company, earning fees from insurers and theft victims. Its founding shareholders included insurance and auction houses, which some think is a conflict of interest Christie's#cite note-72. The majority of shares are owned by its founder, Julian Radcliffe.[9] Significant capital investment was needed so that IFAR could be computerised and so that the database made available to worldwide law enforcement agencies and others.

Development

In response to the growth and development of IFAR, museum officials revised some policies based on an assumption that discussing theft would scare away potential donors. The AFR initially formed a partnership with the ALR, but, they later split after disagreements over strategy and issues of control.[9] The change from policies of secrecy to ones which emphasize openness was gradual, mirroring an expectation that publicizing theft is likely to promote recovery.[8] The ALR has been widely criticised for its methods and for the actions of its chairman, Julian Radcliffe. The Register has consistently lost money but for the personal cash infusions of its chairman.[10]

Selected timeline
This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.

Criticism of methods

The approach adopted by the ALR has been criticised. The Register has contacted owners of stolen art saying it had information, but not revealing it until a fee was paid. In another instance, the ALR lied to Sotheby’s saying that paintings were not stolen. The paintings were then shipped to London, where they were seized.[9] The ALR has likened this approach to the police misleading a suspect during an investigation.

See also

Notes
  1. Eileen Kinsella. "The Art Loss Register is Entangled in Three Major International Art Disputes". artnet Magazine, June 5, 2015
  2. "International Foundation for Art Research (IFAR)-IFAR Home Page". www.ifar.org. Retrieved 20 November 2017.
  3. Art Loss Register Archived May 1, 2010, at the Wayback Machine: History Archived May 25, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  4. "IFAR Retains Ownership of Art Loss Database".
  5. Houpt, Simon. (2006). Museum of the Missing, p. 8.
  6. Houpt, p. 9.
  7. Glueck, Grace. "Art Group Is Set Up To Judge Attribution," New York Times. May 8, 1970.
  8. Yarrow, Andrew L. "A Lucrative Crime Grows Into a Costly Epidemic," New York Times. March 20, 1990.
  9. Tracking Stolen Art, for Profit, and Blurring a Few Lines, New York Times, September 20, 2013
  10. "Art Loss Register Claims to Vet Ancient Art, Does it?".

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.