Shilluk language
Shilluk (natively Dhøg Cøllø or d̪ɔ́cɔ̀llɔ̀)[2] is a language spoken by the Shilluk people of South Sudan and Sudan. It is closely related to other Luo languages. The term Shilluk is a pronunciation of Arabic origin.[3]
Shilluk (Chollo) | |
---|---|
Dhøg Cøllø | |
Pronunciation | Zɔg ʃɔllɔ |
Native to | South Sudan & Sudan |
Region | Upper Nile State & White Nile State |
Ethnicity | Shilluk people |
Native speakers | (175,000 cited 1982)[1] |
Latin | |
Official status | |
Official language in | Shilluk Kingdom |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | shk |
Glottolog | shil1265 |
Phonology
Vowels
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
Close | i [i] i̠ [i̠] | u̠ [u̠] | |
Mid | e [ɛ] e [ɛ̠] | o [o]
ɔ [ɔ] ɔ̠ [ɔ̠] | |
Open | a [a] a̠ [a̠] |
Each of these vowels also exists in a long form and an overlong form which are phonemic.[4][5]
Advanced and retracted tongue root
Shilluk, like most Nilotic languages, differentiates vowels according to their place of articulation. They are either pronounced with advancement of the root of the tongue or with retraction of the root of the tongue. Gilley uses the terms "extended larynx" or "blown vowel".
The vowels with advancement of the root of the tongue are [i], [e], [o], [ɔ], [a] and their corresponding long variants. The vowels with retraction of the root of the language are denoted by a macron below the letter: [i̠], [e̠], [o̠], [ɔ̠], [u̠] and [a̠] and their corresponding long variants.
Consonants
Labial | Dental | Alveolar | Lateral | Dorsal | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Palatal | Velar | ||||||
Stop | Voiceless | p [p] | t̪ [t̪] | t [t] | k [k] | ||
Voiced | b [b] | d̪ [d̪] | d [d] | g [g] | |||
Fricative | s [s] | ||||||
Affricate | Voiceless | c [t͡ʃ] | |||||
Voiced | j [d͡ʒ] | ||||||
Nasal | m [m] | n̪ [n̪] | n [n] | ɲ [ɲ] | ŋ [ŋ] | ||
Liquid | r [r] | l [l] | |||||
Approximant | w [w] | y [j] |
Tone
Shilluk has a rich inventory of tones, with at least seven distinctive tone patterns or tonemes.[5]
There are three level tonemes: Low, Mid and High. In addition, there are four contours – the Rise and three falling configurations: Fall, High Fall and Late Fall. These are denoted by the following diacritics:
Tone description | Diacritic | Tone bars | |
---|---|---|---|
Level | Low | cv̀c (grave accent) | ꜖ |
Mid | cv̄c (macron) | ꜔ | |
High | cv́c (acute accent) | ꜒ | |
Contoured | Rising | cv̌c (caron) | ꜖꜔ |
Falling | cv̂c (circumflex) | ꜔꜖ | |
High Falling | cv̂́c (circumflex with acute accent) | ꜒꜖ | |
Late Falling | cv́c̀ (acute accent followed by grave accent) | ꜒꜒꜖ |
Morphology
Syllable structure
Uninflected native stem syllables are overwhelmingly monosyllabic. With few exceptions, these monosyllabic stems typically consist of an onset, a vowel (nucleus), and a coda. Their structure is as follows:[5]
C (Cj/w) V (V) (V) C
The monosyllabic stems give rise to polysyllabic words through processes of derivation or inflection. For verbs and nouns alike, the most common prefixes are /a- ʊ-/, and the most common suffixes are /-Cɪ -ɪ -a (-ɔ)/.[5]
Orthography
A Latin alphabet was developed for Shilluk by Christian missionaries in the early 20th century.[6] There are 29 characters in Shilluk orthography; 10 vowels and 19 consonants.[7]
a | á | à | ä | aa | b | c | d | dh | dhh | e | é | è | ë | ee | g |
í | ì | ï | ii | j | k | l | m | ng | ngg | nh | nhh | ny | nyy | o | |
ó | ö | ø | oo | p | r | t | th | u | ú | ù | uu | v | w | y |
Sample text
- Gwɛtti Dhɔ Cɔlɔ mi tyɛli malɔ
- Gwedd ki Dhøg Cøllø men nyänø
- Cigg dyërø mi dhaanhø ki Dhøg Cøllø ki yij wänyø mi cigg Pödh Cøllø
Syntax
Transitive verb classes
Shilluk transitive verbs have a phonological root that consists of a single closed syllable of the form /C(j/w)V(V)C/. "That is, the root vowel is either short or long, and clustering of consonants is restricted to the onset, where either of the semivowels /w,j/ may follow another consonant."[8] There are seven classes distinguished by alternations in terms of vowel length and tone.
Verb
classes |
Fixed short | Short with grade | Long | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Low fall | Low | Low fall | Low | Low fall | High fall | |
Example | {ŋɔ̀l} ‘cut’ {lɛ̂ŋ} | {lɛ̂ŋ} ‘drum’ | {càm} ‘eat’ | {mʌ̂l} ‘roast’ | {lɛ̀ɛŋ} ‘throw’ | {mâat̪} ‘drink’ | {mấal} ‘praise’ |
SV past | á-ŋɔ̀l | á-lɛ̂ŋ | á-càm | á-mʌ̂l | á-ɛ̀ɛŋ | á-mâat̪ | á-mấal |
Past 2sg | á-ŋɔ̀l | á-lɛ̂ŋ | á-càaam | á-mʌ̂ʌʌl | á-ɛ̀ɛɛŋ | á-mâaat̪ | á-mấaal |
OV impf | ʊ̀-ŋɔ̀l-ɔ̀ | ʊ̀-lɛ̂ŋ-ɔ̀ | ʊ̀-càaam-ɔ̀ | ʊ̀-mʌ̂ʌʌl-ɔ̀ | ʊ̀-ɛ̀ɛɛŋ-ɔ̀ | ʊ̀-mâaat̪-ɔ̀ | ʊ̀-mấaal-ɔ̀ |
Adjectives
"Aside from the base form, the inflectional paradigms of adjectives present two other forms, neither of which are productive. One is the contingent form." "This inflection is used when the attribute is referenced non-permanently, to a limited degree, or subjectively. The other is the plural form, which is available for seven adjectives only. Derivational morphology includes an essence nominalization and an intransitive verb derivation. When adjectives are used as predicates, there is no copula, nor any morphological marking of the syntactic juncture. In contrast, when adjectives are used as modifiers, their status as such is signposted by three different morphosyntactic structures. The choice between these three structures is determined by definiteness and semantic specificity."[8]
Nouns
Noun inflection is characterised by head marking: pertensive and construct-state are both inflections that mark the head, not the dependent. For example, English has a person's rodent, where the head is rodent and the possessive marking is on the dependent person's. In contrast, Shilluk has a pertensive affix on the head (e.g., dúup = "rodent", dû́uup = "rodent belonging to").[9]
Number is marked, but no predictable system has been identified. Instead, there are over 140 different patterns of number marking on nouns.[9]
References
- Shilluk (Chollo) at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)
- "Chollo (Dhøg Cøllø)". openroad.net.au. Retrieved 26 March 2015.
- Gilley, Leoma G. (1992). Summer Institute of Linguistics (ed.). An autosegmental approach to Shilluk phonology (revised text of a thesis, University of London). Dallas, Texas. p. 214. ISBN 0-88312-106-9.
- Miller, Cynthia L.; Gilley, Leoma G. (2001). "Evidence for ergativity in Shilluk". Journal of African Languages and Linguistics. 22 (1): 33–68. doi:10.1515/jall.22.1.33.
- Remijsen, Bert; Ayoker, Otto G.; Mills, Timothy (2011). "Illustrations of the IPA – Shilluk". Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 41 (1). doi:10.1017/s0025100310000289.
- "Shilluk language and pronunciation". www.omniglot.com. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
- "Cøllø (aka Shilluk) Dictionary » Alphabet". shilluk.webonary.org. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
- Remijsen, Bert; Ayoker, Otto Gwado (2018-10-22). "LD&C SP14: A Descriptive Grammar of Shilluk". Language Documentation & Conservation. Retrieved 2020-12-24.
- Remijsen, Bert; Ayoker, Otto Gwado (2017). "Shilluk noun morphology and noun phrase morphosyntax". Research gate.