Opinion polling for the 2010 Czech legislative election
Opinion polling for the 2010 Czech legislative election started immediately after the 2006 legislative election.
Opinion polls
Date | Polling Firm | ČSSD | ODS | TOP 09 | KSČM | VV | KDU-ČSL | SZ | SPO | Others | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28-29 May 2010 | Election | 22.1 | 20.2 | 16.7 | 11.3 | 10.9 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 7.7 | |||||||
Exit poll | SC&C | 20.0 | 20.0 | 17.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 9.0 | |||||||
7–12 May 2010 | Factum Invenio | 26.3 | 22.9 | 10.9 | 13.1 | 12.6 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 3.6 | |||||||
3–10 May 2010 | CVVM | 30.5 | 19.0 | 14.0 | 13.0 | 11.5 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |||||||
28 April–4 May 2010 | Sanep | 29.9 | 22.3 | 10.1 | 12.9 | 9.8 | 4.7 | 2.8 | 5.5 | 2.0 | |||||||
2 Apr - 1 May 2010 | Median | 26.2 | 19.0 | 10.7 | 13.3 | 7.6 | 7.5 | 3.5 | 6.8 | 5.3 | |||||||
23–28 April 2010 | Factum Invenio | 27.5 | 21.7 | 11.1 | 13.9 | 11.0 | 5.2 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.5 | |||||||
13–28 April 2010 | Médea Research | 30.4 | 18.7 | 13.7 | 10.0 | 12.0 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 2.2 | |||||||
7–13 April 2010 | Sanep | 29.0 | 20.1 | 13.4 | 13.0 | 8.5 | 5.6 | 3.6 | 5.2 | 1.6 | |||||||
5–12 April 2010 | CVVM | 30.0 | 22.5 | 11.5 | 13.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |||||||
1–10 April 2010 | STEM | 27.8 | 18.6 | 9.3 | 9.9 | 8.1 | 4.9 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 15.2 | |||||||
3 - 9 Apr 2010 | Factum Invenio | 29.5 | 22.3 | 11.6 | 13.9 | 8.9 | 5.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 3.0 | |||||||
2 Mar - 30 Apr 2010 | Median | 27.0 | 21.2 | 7.5 | 16.8 | 4.3 | 7.4 | 4.8 | N/A | 11.0 | |||||||
1 - 8 Mar 2010 | CVVM | 32.0 | 25.5 | 10.0 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | |||||||
27 Feb - 8 Mar 2010 | STEM | 27.9 | 20.0 | 7.7 | 11.3 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 14.7 | |||||||
26 Feb - 3 Mar 2010 | Factum Invenio | 27.4 | 23.0 | 11.8 | 14.4 | 7.8 | 6.2 | 4.7 | N/A | 4.7 | |||||||
1 - 8 Feb 2010 | CVVM | 33.0 | 20.5 | 12.5 | 14.5 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | |||||||
1–8 February 2010 | STEM | 28.6 | 23.2 | 9.1 | 11.7 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 13.7 | |||||||
29 Jan - 3 Feb 2010 | Factum Invenio | 31.0 | 25.1 | 11.3 | 13.5 | N/A | 6.2 | 2.2 | N/A | 5.5 | |||||||
4 Jan - 2 Feb 2010 | Median | 32.0 | 27.8 | 9.3 | 12.8 | 2.4 | 7.4 | 4.3 | N/A | 4.0 | |||||||
22 - 27 Jan 2010 | Factum Invenio | 31.8 | 25.5 | 11.4 | 13.3 | 4.6 | 6.6 | 2.0 | N/A | 4.8 | |||||||
11–18 January 2010 | CVVM | 28.0 | 25.5 | 13.0 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | |||||||
2–11 January 2010 | STEM | 28.7 | 20.9 | 8.4 | 10.9 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | N/A | 19.0 | |||||||
1 - 9 Dec 2009 | STEM | 28.7 | 22.5 | 8.3 | 10.9 | 2.9 | 5.7 | 3.8 | N/A | 17.2 | |||||||
30 Nov - 7 Dec 2009 | CVVM | 34.0 | 24.0 | 13.5 | 12.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | N/A | 3.0 | |||||||
5 - 11 Nov 2009 | Factum Invenio | 29.1 | 26.7 | 11.6 | 12.9 | 3.8 | 5.5 | 3.6 | N/A | 6.8 | |||||||
31 Oct - 11 Nov 2009 | STEM | 25.4 | 23.3 | 8.4 | 12.3 | 1.8 | 5.1 | 3.5 | N/A | 20.2 | |||||||
12 - 19 Oct 2009 | STEM | 26.2 | 25.2 | 8.7 | 11.6 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 3.2 | N/A | 18.9 | |||||||
5 - 12 Oct 2009 | CVVM | 32.0 | 26.0 | 14.0 | 15.0 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 4.0 | N/A | 2.0 | |||||||
25 - 30 Sept 2009 | Factum Invenio | 27.2 | 27.5 | 10.4 | 15.2 | 2.4 | 7.3 | 3.5 | N/A | 6.5 | |||||||
21 - 28 Sept 2009 | CVVM | 32.0 | 28.5 | 12.5 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | N/A | 3.0 | |||||||
18 - 25 Sept 2009 | STEM | 27.4 | 23.2 | 9.2 | 10.6 | N/A | 4.2 | 4.6 | N/A | 20.8 | |||||||
31 Aug - 7 Sep 2009 | CVVM | 29.5 | 29.5 | 13.0 | 15.5 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 4.5 | N/A | 1.5 | |||||||
28 Aug - 2 Sep 2009 | Factum Invenio | 32.6 | 27.2 | 11.9 | 13.8 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 3.0 | N/A | 3.4 | |||||||
10 - 20 Aug 2009 | STEM | 29.0 | 24.1 | 6.8 | 11.2 | N/A | 5.7 | 2.7 | N/A | 20.5 | |||||||
3 - 10 Aug 2009 | CVVM | 33.0 | 31.0 | 9.5 | 13.5 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 3.0 | N/A | 3.5 | |||||||
31 Jul - 5 Aug 2009 | Factum Invenio | 29.5 | 27.9 | 11.4 | 13.4 | 3.4 | 6.6 | 2.9 | N/A | 4.9 | |||||||
17 - 22 Jul 2009 | Factum Invenio | 29.2 | 31.8 | 5.2 | 13.6 | N/A | 5.2 | 3.7 | N/A | 8.8 | |||||||
8 - 15 Jun 2009 | CVVM | 30.0 | 35.0 | 2.0 | 16.0 | N/A | 6.5 | 5.5 | N/A | 5.0 | |||||||
8 - 15 Jun 2009 | STEM | 28.2 | 28.3 | N/A | 12.8 | N/A | 6.2 | 2.7 | N/A | 21.8 | |||||||
5–12 May 2009 | STEM | 32.4 | 23.7 | N/A | 10.9 | N/A | 5.9 | 5.3 | N/A | 21.8 | |||||||
4–11 May 2009 | CVVM | 38.0 | 29.0 | N/A | 15.0 | N/A | 6.5 | 7.0 | N/A | 4.5 | |||||||
1 - 6 Apr 2009 | STEM | 35.1 | 27.5 | N/A | 10.5 | N/A | 4.4 | 5.6 | N/A | 17.0 | |||||||
30 Mar - 6 Apr 2009 | CVVM | 37.5 | 28.0 | N/A | 15.5 | N/A | 7.0 | 7.0 | N/A | 5.0 | |||||||
2 - 9 Mar 2009 | STEM | 35.3 | 27.8 | N/A | 11.0 | N/A | 6.0 | 5.3 | N/A | 14.6 | |||||||
2 - 9 Mar 2009 | CVVM | 36.0 | 31.5 | N/A | 16.0 | N/A | 5.0 | 7.0 | N/A | 4.5 | |||||||
22 - 27 Feb 2008 | Factum Invenio | 37.3 | 30.7 | N/A | 16.2 | N/A | 6.0 | 8.3 | N/A | 1.5 | |||||||
2 - 9 Feb 2009 | CVVM | 38.5 | 29.0 | N/A | 15.5 | N/A | 7.0 | 6.0 | N/A | 4.0 | |||||||
31 Jan - 6 Feb 2009 | STEM | 35.2 | 25.5 | N/A | 11.8 | N/A | 6.8 | 5.1 | N/A | 15.6 | |||||||
12 - 19 Jan 2009 | CVVM | 41.0 | 29.0 | N/A | 14.0 | N/A | 5.5 | 7.0 | N/A | 3.5 | |||||||
2 - 9 Jan 2009 | STEM | 37.7 | 22.5 | N/A | 9.9 | N/A | 6.5 | 5.8 | N/A | 17.6 | |||||||
11 - 16 Jan 2008 | Factum Invenio | 38.0 | 27.8 | N/A | 17.5 | N/A | 6.4 | 7.6 | N/A | 2,7 | |||||||
2 - 3 Jun 2006 | 2006 Election | 32.3 | 35.3 | N/A | 12.8 | N/A | 7.2 | 6.3 | N/A | 6.1 |
Seats
Date | Polling Firm | ČSSD | ODS | TOP 09 | KSČM | VV | KDU-ČSL | SZ | SPO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28-29 May 2010 | Election | 56 | 53 | 41 | 26 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7–12 May 2010 | Factum Invenio | 62 | 55 | 21 | 28 | 26 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
28 April–4 May 2010 | Sanep | 66 | 49 | 22 | 29 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
23–28 April 2010 | Factum Invenio | 66 | 51 | 22 | 30 | 23 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
13–28 April 2010 | Médea Research | 74 | 44 | 31 | 24 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3–9 April 2010 | Factum Invenio | 70 | 53 | 23 | 30 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
1–10 April 2010 | STEM | 78 | 48 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
27 February - 8 March 2010 | STEM | 75 | 56 | 17 | 29 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
1–8 February 2010 | STEM | 77 | 68 | 19 | 31 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
2–11 January 2010 | STEM | 83 | 59 | 20 | 32 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Preferred Prime Minister polling
Date | Polling Firm | Mirek Topolánek | Jiří Paroubek | Petr Nečas | Karel Schwarzenberg | Radek John | Miloš Zeman | Vojtěch Filip | Ondřej Liška | Cyril Svoboda |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 May 2010 | Médea Research[1] | N/A | 13.0 | 13.0 | 16.0 | 22.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
22 April 2010 | SANEP[2] | N/A | 26.3 | 24.7 | 39.2 | 43.3 | 29.4 | 15.5 | 11.3 | 19.7 |
16 April 2010 | Factum Invenio[3] | N/A | 14.6 | 12.2 | 8.4 | 5.2 | N/A | 5.4 | N/A | N/A |
14 April 2010 | Median[4] | N/A | 20.0 | 30.6 | 30.8 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27 March 2010 | Median[5] | N/A | 35.0 | 53.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
10 August 2009 | Median[6] | 19.2 | 17.4 | N/A | 5.7 | N/A | N/A | 7.4 | 3.2 | N/A |
Other surveys
Date | Polling Firm | ČSSD | ODS | TOP 09 | KSČM | VV | KDU-ČSL | SZ | SPO | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21 May 2010 | iDnes Virtual Election | 4.3 | 23.1 | 33.0 | 1.7 | 11.3 | 3.1 | 6.5 | 3.3 | |
28–29 April | Student Election | 5.3 | 17.6 | 26.6 | 3.0 | 12.1 | 1.7 | 5.3 | 3.1 | 25.3 |
References
- [email protected], TYDEN, www.tyden.cz, e-mail (4 May 2010). "Soukupova agentura: Češi chtějí Johna za premiéra". TÝDEN.cz. Retrieved 27 August 2017.
- "Nejlepší příští premiér? Podle lidí John, Schwarzenberg či Zeman". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 27 August 2017.
- "Podle průzkumu chce nejvíc lidí za premiéra Paroubka". Tiscali.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 27 August 2017.
- "Průzkum LN: ideálním premiérem by byl Schwarzenberg nebo Nečas | Domov". Lidovky.cz. 14 April 2010. Retrieved 27 August 2017.
- "Průzkum MF DNES: Nečas by byl lepší premiér než Paroubek". iDNES.cz. 27 March 2010. Retrieved 27 August 2017.
- "Nejvíce lidí chce premiérem opět Topolánka". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 27 August 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.