Open and closed maps
In mathematics, more specifically in topology, an open map is a function between two topological spaces that maps open sets to open sets.[1][2][3] That is, a function is open if for any open set in the image is open in Likewise, a closed map is a function that maps closed sets to closed sets.[3][4] A map may be open, closed, both, or neither;[5] in particular, an open map need not be closed and vice versa.[6]
Open[7] and closed[8] maps are not necessarily continuous.[4] Further, continuity is independent of openness and closedness in the general case and a continuous function may have one, both, or neither property;[3] this fact remains true even if one restricts oneself to metric spaces.[9] Although their definitions seem more natural, open and closed maps are much less important than continuous maps. Recall that, by definition, a function is continuous if the preimage of every open set of is open in [2] (Equivalently, if the preimage of every closed set of is closed in ).
Early study of open maps was pioneered by Simion Stoilow and Gordon Thomas Whyburn.[10]
Definition and characterizations
Let be a function between topological spaces.
Open maps
We say that is an open map if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:
- maps open sets to open sets (i.e. for any open subset of is an open subset of );
- for every and every neighborhood of (however small), there exists a neighborhood of such that ;
- for all subsets of where denotes the topological interior of the set;
- whenever is a closed subset of then the set is closed in ;[11]
and if is a basis for then we may add to this list:
- maps basic open sets to open sets (i.e. for any basic open set is an open subset of );
We say that is a relatively open map if is an open map, where is the range or image of [12]
- Warning: Many authors define "open map" to mean "relatively open map" (e.g. The Encyclopedia of Mathematics). That is, they define "open map" to mean that for any open subset of is an open subset of (rather than an open subset of which is how this article has defined "open map"). When is surjective then these two definitions coincide but in general they are not equivalent because although every open map is a relatively open map, relatively open maps often fail to be open maps. It is thus advisable to always check what definition of "open map" an author is using.
Closed maps
We say that is a closed map if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:
- maps closed sets to closed sets (i.e. for any closed subset of is an closed subset of );
- for all subsets of
We say that is a relatively closed map if is a closed map.
Sufficient conditions
The composition of two open maps is again open; the composition of two closed maps is again closed.[13][14]
The categorical sum of two open maps is open, or of two closed maps is closed.[14]
The categorical product of two open maps is open, however, the categorical product of two closed maps need not be closed.[13][14]
A bijective map is open if and only if it is closed. The inverse of a bijective continuous map is a bijective open/closed map (and vice versa). A surjective open map is not necessarily a closed map, and likewise, a surjective closed map is not necessarily an open map.
Closed map lemma — Every continuous function from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is closed and proper (i.e. preimages of compact sets are compact).
A variant of the closed map lemma states that if a continuous function between locally compact Hausdorff spaces is proper, then it is also closed.
In complex analysis, the identically named open mapping theorem states that every non-constant holomorphic function defined on a connected open subset of the complex plane is an open map.
The invariance of domain theorem states that a continuous and locally injective function between two -dimensional topological manifolds must be open.
Invariance of domain — If is an open subset of and is an injective continuous map, then is open in and is a homeomorphism between and
In functional analysis, the open mapping theorem states that every surjective continuous linear operator between Banach spaces is an open map. This theorem has been generalized to topological vector spaces beyond just Banach spaces.
Examples
Every homeomorphism is open, closed, and continuous. In fact, a bijective continuous map is a homeomorphism if and only if it is open, or equivalently, if and only if it is closed.
If has the discrete topology (i.e. all subsets are open and closed) then every function is both open and closed (but not necessarily continuous). For example, the floor function from to is open and closed, but not continuous. This example shows that the image of a connected space under an open or closed map need not be connected.
Whenever we have a product of topological spaces the natural projections are open[15][16] (as well as continuous). Since the projections of fiber bundles and covering maps are locally natural projections of products, these are also open maps. Projections need not be closed however. Consider for instance the projection on the first component; then the set is closed in but is not closed in However, for a compact space the projection is closed. This is essentially the tube lemma.
To every point on the unit circle we can associate the angle of the positive '-axis with the ray connecting the point with the origin. This function from the unit circle to the half-open interval [0,2π) is bijective, open, and closed, but not continuous. It shows that the image of a compact space under an open or closed map need not be compact. Also note that if we consider this as a function from the unit circle to the real numbers, then it is neither open nor closed. Specifying the codomain is essential.
The function with is continuous and closed, but not open.
Properties
Let be a continuous map that is either open or closed. Then
- if is a surjection, then it is a quotient map,
- if is an injection, then it is a topological embedding, and
- if is a bijection, then it is a homeomorphism.
In the first two cases, being open or closed is merely a sufficient condition for the result to follow. In the third case, it is necessary as well.
If is a continuous open map, and then:
- where denotes the topological boundary of a set.
- where denote the topological closure of a set.
- If then
where this set is also a regular closed set.[note 1] In particular, if is a regular closed set then so is And if a regular open set then so is
- If the continuous open map is also surjective then and moreover, is a regular open (resp. a regular closed)[note 1] subset of if and only if is a regular open (resp. a regular closed) subset of
Suppose is a function and is a surjective map. Let so that it for every is a singleton set whose sole element will be denoted by This induces a map which is the unique map satisfying for every The importance of this map is that holds on where by its very definition, the set is the (unique) largest subset of for which this is true. If is a continuous open surjection from a first-countable space onto a Hausdorff space and if is a continuous map valued in a Hausdorff space then is continuous[note 2] and is a closed subset of [note 3]
See also
- Almost open linear map
- Closed graph – A graph of a function that is also a closed subset of the product space
- Closed linear operator
- Quasi-open map – A function that maps non-empty open sets to sets that have non-empty interior in its codomain.
- Quotient map
- Perfect map – A continuous closed surjective map, each of whose fibers are also compact sets.
- Proper map – A map between topological spaces with the property that the preimage of every compact is compact
Notes
- A subset is called a regular closed set if or equivalently, if where (resp. ) denotes the topological boundary (resp. interior, closure) of in The set is called a regular open set if or equivalently, if The interior (taken in ) of a closed subset of is always a regular open subset of The closure (taken in ) of an open subset of is always a regular closed subset of
- This is a consequence of the following more general result, which is straightforward to prove: If is a quotient map and is arbitrary then with and defined as before, for any the restriction is continuous if and only is continuous.
- The (non-trivial) conclusion that is a closed subset of was reached despite the fact that the definition of was purely set-theoretic and completely independent of any topology.
Citations
- Munkres, James R. (2000). Topology (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-181629-2.
- Mendelson, Bert (1990) [1975]. Introduction to Topology (Third ed.). Dover. p. 89. ISBN 0-486-66352-3.
It is important to remember that Theorem 5.3 says that a function is continuous if and only if the inverse image of each open set is open. This characterization of continuity should not be confused with another property that a function may or may not possess, the property that the image of each open set is an open set (such functions are called open mappings).
- Lee, John M. (2003). Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 218. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 550. ISBN 9780387954486.
A map (continuous or not) is said to be an open map if for every closed subset is open in and a closed map if for every closed subset is closed in Continuous maps may be open, closed, both, or neither, as can be seen by examining simple examples involving subsets of the plane.
- Ludu, Andrei. Nonlinear Waves and Solitons on Contours and Closed Surfaces. Springer Series in Synergetics. p. 15. ISBN 9783642228940.
An open map is a function between two topological spaces which maps open sets to open sets. Likewise, a closed map is a function which maps closed sets to closed sets. The open or closed maps are not necessarily continuous.
- Sohrab, Houshang H. (2003). Basic Real Analysis. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 203. ISBN 9780817642112.
Now we are ready for our examples which show that a function may be open without being closed or closed without being open. Also, a function may be simultaneously open and closed or neither open nor closed.
(The quoted statement in given in the context of metric spaces but as topological spaces arise as generalizations of metric spaces, the statement holds there as well.) - Naber, Gregory L. (2012). Topological Methods in Euclidean Spaces. Dover Books on Mathematics (reprint ed.). Courier Corporation. p. 18. ISBN 9780486153445.
Exercise 1-19. Show that the projection map π1:X1 × ··· × Xk → Xi is an open map, but need not be a closed map. Hint: The projection of R2 onto is not closed. Similarly, a closed map need not be open since any constant map is closed. For maps that are one-to-one and onto, however, the concepts of 'open' and 'closed' are equivalent.
- Mendelson, Bert (1990) [1975]. Introduction to Topology (Third ed.). Dover. p. 89. ISBN 0-486-66352-3.
There are many situations in which a function has the property that for each open subset of the set is an open subset of and yet is not continuous.
- Boos, Johann (2000). Classical and Modern Methods in Summability. Oxford University Press. p. 332. ISBN 0-19-850165-X.
Now, the question arises whether the last statement is true in general, that is whether closed maps are continuous. That fails in general as the following example proves.
- Kubrusly, Carlos S. (2011). The Elements of Operator Theory. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 115. ISBN 9780817649982.
In general, a map of a metric space into a metric space may possess any combination of the attributes 'continuous', 'open', and 'closed' (i.e., these are independent concepts).
- Hart, K. P.; Nagata, J.; Vaughan, J. E., eds. (2004). Encyclopedia of General Topology. Elsevier. p. 86. ISBN 0-444-50355-2.
It seems that the study of open (interior) maps began with papers [13,14] by S. Stoïlow. Clearly, openness of maps was first studied extensively by G.T. Whyburn [19,20].
- Stack exchange post
- Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 225-273.
- Baues, Hans-Joachim; Quintero, Antonio (2001). Infinite Homotopy Theory. K-Monographs in Mathematics. 6. p. 53. ISBN 9780792369820.
A composite of open maps is open and a composite of closed maps is closed. Also, a product of open maps is open. In contrast, a product of closed maps is not necessarily closed,...
- James, I. M. (1984). General Topology and Homotopy Theory. Springer-Verlag. p. 49. ISBN 9781461382836.
...let us recall that the composition of open maps is open and the composition of closed maps is closed. Also that the sum of open maps is open and the sum of closed maps is closed. However, the product of closed maps is not necessarily closed, although the product of open maps is open.
- Willard, Stephen (1970). General Topology. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0486131785.
- Lee, John M. (2012). Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 218 (Second ed.). p. 606. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9982-5. ISBN 978-1-4419-9982-5.
Exercise A.32. Suppose are topological spaces. Show that each projection is an open map.
References
- Narici, Lawrence; Beckenstein, Edward (2011). Topological Vector Spaces. Pure and applied mathematics (Second ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN 978-1584888666. OCLC 144216834.
- Schaefer, Helmut H.; Wolff, Manfred P. (1999). Topological Vector Spaces. GTM. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York Imprint Springer. ISBN 978-1-4612-7155-0. OCLC 840278135.
- Trèves, François (2006) [1967]. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-45352-1. OCLC 853623322.