Klimt University of Vienna Ceiling Paintings

The Klimt University of Vienna Ceiling Paintings, also known as the Faculty Paintings, were a series of paintings made by Gustav Klimt for the ceiling of the University of Vienna's Great Hall between the years of 1900–1907. In 1894, Klimt was commissioned to paint the ceiling. Upon presenting his paintings, Philosophy, Medicine and Jurisprudence, Klimt came under attack for 'pornography' and 'perverted excess' in the paintings. None of the paintings would go on display in the university.

Klimt University of Vienna Ceiling Paintings
The bottom portion of the Medicine picture, showing Hygieia
ArtistGustav Klimt
Year1900–1907

In May 1945, it is contended that all three paintings were destroyed when retreating SS forces set fire to the building they were housed in.[1] However, this is unverified. [2]

Philosophy
Philosophy, 1899–1907. Ceiling panel for the Great Hall of Vienna University. Destroyed by fire in Schloss Immendorf in 1945.[3]

Philosophy was the first of the three pictures presented to the Austrian Government at the seventh Vienna Secession exhibition in March 1900. It had been awarded a gold medal at the World Exhibition in Paris, but was attacked by many art critics in his own country. Klimt described the painting as follows: "On the left a group of figures, the beginning of life, fruition, decay. On the right, the globe as mystery. Emerging below, a figure of light: knowledge." Critics were disturbed by its depiction of men and women drifting in an aimless trance. The original proposal for the theme of the painting was "The Victory of Light over Darkness", but what Klimt presented instead was a dreamlike mass of humanity, referring neither to optimism nor rationalism, but to a "viscous void".[4]

Medicine
Medicine, 1899–1907

Medicine was the second painting, presented in March 1901 at the tenth Secession Exhibition. It featured a column of semi-nude figures on the right hand side of the painting, representing the river of life. Beside it was a young nude female who floated in space, with a newborn infant at her feet, representing life. A skeleton represented death in the river of life. The only link between the floating woman and the river of bodies is two arms, the woman's and a man's as seen from behind. At the bottom of the painting Hygieia stood with the Aesculapian snake around her arm and the cup of Lethe in her hand, turning her back to mankind. Klimt conveyed an ambiguous unity of life and death, with nothing to celebrate the role of medicine or the science of healing.[5] Upon display of the painting in 1901, he was attacked by critics. An editorial in the Medizinische Wochenschrift complained that the painter had ignored doctors' two main achievements, prevention and cure. For a rough composition draft of the painting see here.[6]

Jurisprudence
Jurisprudence, 1899–1907

Jurisprudence, too, is laden with anxiety: a condemned man is depicted surrounded by three female furies and a sea monster, while in the background, the three goddesses of Truth, Justice, and Law look on. They are shown as the Eumenides, punishing the condemned man with an octopus's deadly embrace. The conflict in Jurisprudence has been seen as "psycho-sexual".[7]

Reaction

The Faculty Paintings were attacked by critics when they were presented, as each painting broke different cultural taboos, contradicting the trend of the era to "sublimate reality and to only present its more favourable aspects" (Neret). The paintings also drew the standard charges of obscenity which Klimt often faced. Eighty-seven faculty members protested against the murals,[8] and in 1901 a public prosecutor was called in and the issue even reached the Parliament of Austria, the first time that a cultural debate had ever been raised there, but in the end no action was taken. Only the education minister defended Klimt, and when Klimt was elected to be a professor at the Academy of Fine Arts in 1901 the government refused to ratify the action. He was never offered another teaching position. This would also be the last time Klimt would accept commissions from the state, remarking: "I've had enough of censorship ... I reject all state support, I don't want any of it."[9]

Goldfish 1901-1902

A later painting of his entitled Goldfish (to my critics) (1901–1902),[10] which showed a smiling, beautiful woman projecting her bottom at the viewer, was a response to all those who attacked the 'pornography' and 'perverted excess' of the University paintings.

In 1903, Hermann Bahr, a writer and a supporter of Klimt, in response to the criticism of the Faculty Paintings compiled articles which attacked Klimt, and published a book Gegen Klimt (Against Klimt) with his foreword, where he argued that the reactions were absurd.[11]

Outcome and destruction

The paintings were requested for the Louisiana Purchase Exposition in 1904 in St. Louis, Missouri, but the ministry declined, nervous of what the reaction might be. Klimt then resigned his commission, wishing to keep his work, but the ministry insisted they were already property of the state. Only when Klimt threatened the removal staff with a shotgun was he able to keep his painting.[12] Klimt repaid his advance of 30,000 crowns with the support of August Lederer, one of his major patrons, who in return received Philosophy. In 1911 Medicine and Jurisprudence were bought by Klimt's friend and fellow artist, Koloman Moser. Medicine eventually came into the possession of a Jewish family, and in 1938 the painting was seized by Germany. In 1943, after a final exhibition, they were moved to Schloss Immendorf, a castle in Lower Austria, for protection.

In May 1945, the paintings are believed to have been destroyed as retreating German SS forces set fire to the castle to prevent it from falling into enemy hands. However, while the castle was gutted, there is no proof that the paintings were destroyed, as the art historian Tina Marie Storkovich found out.[13] As far as is known, all that remains now are preparatory sketches and a few photographs. Only one photograph remains of the complete painting of Medicine, taken just before it was destroyed.[12]

  • Composition for Medicine
  • Study for Medicine
  • Study for Philosophy
  • Study for Jurisprudence

Notes
  1. Jones, Jonathan (May 6, 2008). "Klimt's Dazzling demons". The Guardian. Retrieved February 16, 2012.
  2. Storkovich, Tina Marie. The Burned Klimt Pictures / The Puzzle of Immendorf Castle., 2015-12-18, retrieved 2019-12-01
  3. Gilles Néret (1999). Gustav Klimt: 1862-1918. Taschen. p. 94. ISBN 978-3-8228-5980-3.
  4. Fleidl, Gottfried: Gustav Klimt 1862–1918: The World in Female Form, p. 77, Benedikt Taschen, 1994.
  5. Fliedl, p. 81, 1994.
  6. "Image: klimt_medicine.jpg, (619 × 867 px)". artchive.com. Retrieved September 5, 2015.
  7. Fleidl, p. 86, 1994.
  8. Fleidl, p. 81, 1994.
  9. Fleidl, p. 88, 1994.
  10. "Image: 184668037_1422f16c45.jpg, (174 × 500 px)". static.flickr.com. Retrieved September 5, 2015.
  11. Hermann Bahr, ed. (1903). Gegen Klimt. Vorwort von Hermann Bahr. Historisches: Philosophie • Medizin • Goldfische • Fries. Wien, Leipzig 1903: Eisenstein & Co.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) CS1 maint: location (link)
  12. Bitsori, M; Galanakis, E (2010-11-16). "Doctors versus artists: Gustav Klimt's Medicine". BMJ. 325 (7378): 1506–1508. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7378.1506. PMC 139056. PMID 12493684.
  13. Das Rätsel um drei verschollene Klimt-Gemälde. Article by Almuth Spiegler in Die Presse, 17-12-2015.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.