Calculus of communicating systems

The calculus of communicating systems (CCS) is a process calculus introduced by Robin Milner around 1980 and the title of a book describing the calculus. Its actions model indivisible communications between exactly two participants. The formal language includes primitives for describing parallel composition, choice between actions and scope restriction. CCS is useful for evaluating the qualitative correctness of properties of a system such as deadlock or livelock.[1]

According to Milner, "There is nothing canonical about the choice of the basic combinators, even though they were chosen with great attention to economy. What characterises our calculus is not the exact choice of combinators, but rather the choice of interpretation and of mathematical framework".

The expressions of the language are interpreted as a labelled transition system. Between these models, bisimilarity is used as a semantic equivalence.

Syntax

Given a set of action names, the set of CCS processes is defined by the following BNF grammar:

The parts of the syntax are, in the order given above

inactive process
the inactive process is a valid CCS process
action
the process can perform an action and continue as the process
process identifier
write to use the identifier to refer to the process (which may contain the identifier itself, i.e., recursive definitions are allowed)
choice
the process can proceed either as the process or the process
parallel composition
tells that processes and exist simultaneously
renaming
is the process with all actions named renamed as
restriction
is the process without action
  • Communicating sequential processes (CSP), developed by Tony Hoare, is a formal language that arose at a similar time to CCS.
  • The Algebra of Communicating Processes (ACP) was developed by Jan Bergstra and Jan Willem Klop in 1982, and uses an axiomatic approach (in the style of Universal algebra) to reason about a similar class of processes as CCS.
  • The pi-calculus, developed by Robin Milner, Joachim Parrow, and David Walker in the late 80's extends CCS with mobility of communication links, by allowing processes to communicate the names of communication channels themselves.
  • PEPA, developed by Jane Hillston introduces activity timing in terms of exponentially distributed rates and probabilistic choice, allowing performance metrics to be evaluated.
  • Reversible Communicating Concurrent Systems (RCCS) introduced by Vincent Danos, Jean Krivine, and others, introduces (partial) reversibility in the execution of CCS processes.

Some other languages based on CCS:

Models that have been used in the study of CCS-like systems:

References

  • Robin Milner: A Calculus of Communicating Systems, Springer Verlag, ISBN 0-387-10235-3. 1980.
  • Robin Milner, Communication and Concurrency, Prentice Hall, International Series in Computer Science, ISBN 0-13-115007-3. 1989
  1. Herzog, Ulrich, ed. (May 2007). "Tackling Large State Spaces in Performance Modelling". Formal Methods for Performance Evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 4486. Springer. pp. 318–370. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72522-0. ISBN 978-3-540-72482-7. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
  2. A Philippou, M Toro, M Antonaki. Simulation and Verification in a Process Calculus for Spatially-Explicit Ecological Models. Scientific Annals of Computer Science 23 (1). 2014
  3. Montesi, Fabrizio; Guidi, Claudio; Lucchi, Roberto; Zavattaro, Gianluigi (2007-06-27). "JOLIE: a Java Orchestration Language Interpreter Engine". Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. Combined Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Coordination and Organization (CoOrg 2006) and the Second International Workshop on Methods and Tools for Coordinating Concurrent, Distributed and Mobile Systems (MTCoord 2006). 181: 19–33. doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2007.01.051. ISSN 1571-0661.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.