1952 United States presidential election in South Dakota
The 1952 United States presidential election in South Dakota took place on November 4, 1952, as part of the 1952 United States presidential election. Voters chose four representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.[3]
.svg.png.webp){kind=small} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 4 South Dakota votes to the Electoral College | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
Eisenhower 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in South Dakota |
|---|
 |
South Dakota was won by Columbia University President Dwight D. Eisenhower (R–New York), running with California Senator Richard Nixon, with 69.27 percent of the popular vote, against Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson II (D), running with Alabama Senator John Sparkman, with 30.73 percent of the popular vote. As of the 2020 presidential election, this is the last election in which Oglala Lakota County, known until 2014 as Shannon County, voted for a Republican presidential candidate.[4]
With 69.27% of the popular vote, South Dakota would be Eisenhower's third strongest state after Vermont and neighboring North Dakota.[5]
Results
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | Dwight D. Eisenhower | 203,857 | 69.27% | |
| Democratic | Adlai Stevenson | 90,426 | 30.73% | |
| Total votes | 294,283 | 100% | ||
Results by county
| County[6] | Dwight David Eisenhower Republican |
Adlai Stevenson II Democratic |
Margin | Total votes cast | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Armstrong | 6 | 54.55% | 5 | 45.45% | 1 | 9.09% | 11 |
| Aurora | 1,458 | 59.39% | 997 | 40.61% | 461 | 18.78% | 2,455 |
| Beadle | 6,487 | 65.33% | 3,443 | 34.67% | 3,044 | 30.65% | 9,930 |
| Bennett | 873 | 62.85% | 516 | 37.15% | 357 | 25.70% | 1,389 |
| Bon Homme | 3,157 | 65.57% | 1,658 | 34.43% | 1,499 | 31.13% | 4,815 |
| Brookings | 5,988 | 76.29% | 1,861 | 23.71% | 4,127 | 52.58% | 7,849 |
| Brown | 9,581 | 60.94% | 6,140 | 39.06% | 3,441 | 21.89% | 15,721 |
| Brule | 1,578 | 53.13% | 1,392 | 46.87% | 186 | 6.26% | 2,970 |
| Buffalo | 413 | 61.46% | 259 | 38.54% | 154 | 22.92% | 672 |
| Butte | 2,689 | 76.26% | 837 | 23.74% | 1,852 | 52.52% | 3,526 |
| Campbell | 1,536 | 90.14% | 168 | 9.86% | 1,368 | 80.28% | 1,704 |
| Charles Mix | 3,316 | 54.31% | 2,790 | 45.69% | 526 | 8.61% | 6,106 |
| Clark | 2,692 | 71.44% | 1,076 | 28.56% | 1,616 | 42.89% | 3,768 |
| Clay | 3,302 | 70.05% | 1,412 | 29.95% | 1,890 | 40.09% | 4,714 |
| Codington | 5,750 | 65.91% | 2,974 | 34.09% | 2,776 | 31.82% | 8,724 |
| Corson | 1,757 | 69.01% | 789 | 30.99% | 968 | 38.02% | 2,546 |
| Custer | 1,725 | 72.57% | 652 | 27.43% | 1,073 | 45.14% | 2,377 |
| Davison | 4,774 | 59.67% | 3,227 | 40.33% | 1,547 | 19.34% | 8,001 |
| Day | 3,648 | 60.81% | 2,351 | 39.19% | 1,297 | 21.62% | 5,999 |
| Deuel | 2,279 | 72.17% | 879 | 27.83% | 1,400 | 44.33% | 3,158 |
| Dewey | 1,301 | 66.34% | 660 | 33.66% | 641 | 32.69% | 1,961 |
| Douglas | 2,103 | 79.93% | 528 | 20.07% | 1,575 | 59.86% | 2,631 |
| Edmunds | 2,178 | 68.25% | 1,013 | 31.75% | 1,165 | 36.51% | 3,191 |
| Fall River | 2,863 | 73.96% | 1,008 | 26.04% | 1,855 | 47.92% | 3,871 |
| Faulk | 1,619 | 68.69% | 738 | 31.31% | 881 | 37.38% | 2,357 |
| Grant | 3,234 | 68.31% | 1,500 | 31.69% | 1,734 | 36.63% | 4,734 |
| Gregory | 2,463 | 64.22% | 1,372 | 35.78% | 1,091 | 28.45% | 3,835 |
| Haakon | 1,176 | 74.81% | 396 | 25.19% | 780 | 49.62% | 1,572 |
| Hamlin | 2,391 | 71.48% | 954 | 28.52% | 1,437 | 42.96% | 3,345 |
| Hand | 2,262 | 70.71% | 937 | 29.29% | 1,325 | 41.42% | 3,199 |
| Hanson | 1,320 | 63.07% | 773 | 36.93% | 547 | 26.13% | 2,093 |
| Harding | 809 | 73.35% | 294 | 26.65% | 515 | 46.69% | 1,103 |
| Hughes | 2,932 | 75.86% | 933 | 24.14% | 1,999 | 51.72% | 3,865 |
| Hutchinson | 4,322 | 83.16% | 875 | 16.84% | 3,447 | 66.33% | 5,197 |
| Hyde | 1,051 | 72.78% | 393 | 27.22% | 658 | 45.57% | 1,444 |
| Jackson | 607 | 70.50% | 254 | 29.50% | 353 | 41.00% | 861 |
| Jerauld | 1,520 | 69.19% | 677 | 30.81% | 843 | 38.37% | 2,197 |
| Jones | 739 | 69.59% | 323 | 30.41% | 416 | 39.17% | 1,062 |
| Kingsbury | 3,703 | 78.25% | 1,029 | 21.75% | 2,674 | 56.51% | 4,732 |
| Lake | 4,020 | 73.28% | 1,466 | 26.72% | 2,554 | 46.55% | 5,486 |
| Lawrence | 5,559 | 76.57% | 1,701 | 23.43% | 3,858 | 53.14% | 7,260 |
| Lincoln | 4,387 | 78.35% | 1,212 | 21.65% | 3,175 | 56.71% | 5,599 |
| Lyman | 1,561 | 70.09% | 666 | 29.91% | 895 | 40.19% | 2,227 |
| Marshall | 2,248 | 66.45% | 1,135 | 33.55% | 1,113 | 32.90% | 3,383 |
| McCook | 2,991 | 72.63% | 1,127 | 27.37% | 1,864 | 45.26% | 4,118 |
| McPherson | 2,915 | 86.99% | 436 | 13.01% | 2,479 | 73.98% | 3,351 |
| Meade | 3,109 | 69.98% | 1,334 | 30.02% | 1,775 | 39.95% | 4,443 |
| Mellette | 787 | 69.40% | 347 | 30.60% | 440 | 38.80% | 1,134 |
| Miner | 1,964 | 65.62% | 1,029 | 34.38% | 935 | 31.24% | 2,993 |
| Minnehaha | 23,559 | 71.50% | 9,390 | 28.50% | 14,169 | 43.00% | 32,949 |
| Moody | 2,728 | 71.47% | 1,089 | 28.53% | 1,639 | 42.94% | 3,817 |
| Pennington | 11,029 | 71.16% | 4,470 | 28.84% | 6,559 | 42.32% | 15,499 |
| Perkins | 2,160 | 71.78% | 849 | 28.22% | 1,311 | 43.57% | 3,009 |
| Potter | 1,625 | 73.73% | 579 | 26.27% | 1,046 | 47.46% | 2,204 |
| Roberts | 3,566 | 58.56% | 2,524 | 41.44% | 1,042 | 17.11% | 6,090 |
| Sanborn | 1,761 | 66.05% | 905 | 33.95% | 856 | 32.11% | 2,666 |
| Shannon | 957 | 55.29% | 774 | 44.71% | 183 | 10.57% | 1,731 |
| Spink | 3,693 | 65.06% | 1,983 | 34.94% | 1,710 | 30.13% | 5,676 |
| Stanley | 695 | 70.63% | 289 | 29.37% | 406 | 41.26% | 984 |
| Sully | 860 | 70.96% | 352 | 29.04% | 508 | 41.91% | 1,212 |
| Todd | 1,025 | 62.65% | 611 | 37.35% | 414 | 25.31% | 1,636 |
| Tripp | 2,790 | 65.88% | 1,445 | 34.12% | 1,345 | 31.76% | 4,235 |
| Turner | 4,604 | 82.39% | 984 | 17.61% | 3,620 | 64.78% | 5,588 |
| Union | 3,393 | 67.35% | 1,645 | 32.65% | 1,748 | 34.70% | 5,038 |
| Walworth | 2,369 | 65.24% | 1,262 | 34.76% | 1,107 | 30.49% | 3,631 |
| Washabaugh | 319 | 68.45% | 147 | 31.55% | 172 | 36.91% | 466 |
| Yankton | 4,802 | 68.39% | 2,220 | 31.61% | 2,582 | 36.77% | 7,022 |
| Ziebach | 779 | 67.68% | 372 | 32.32% | 407 | 35.36% | 1,151 |
| Totals | 203,857 | 69.27% | 90,426 | 30.73% | 113,431 | 38.54% | 294,283 |
References
- "United States Presidential election of 1952 - Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved July 25, 2017.
- "U.S. presidential election, 1952". Facts on File. Archived from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
Eisenhower, born in Texas, considered a resident of New York, and headquartered at the time in Paris, finally decided to run for the Republican nomination
- "1952 Presidential Election Results South Dakota".
- Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
- "1952 Presidential Election Statistics". Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved 2018-03-05.
- Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920-1964; pp. 408-409 ISBN 0405077114
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.