United States v. Cook

United States v. Cook, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 591 (1873), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Indian tribes do not own the land their reservations are on, the land is owned by the United States and the Indians only have a right to occupy the land. They may not cut and sell timber merely for the purpose of selling timber, they may only sell timber that was cut incidental to another purpose. The government has a right to take action to recover damages for timber sold illegally from that land.

United States v. Cook
Decided May 4, 1874
Full case nameUnited States v. George Cook
Citations86 U.S. 591 (more)
19 Wall. 591; 22 L. Ed. 210
Case history
PriorCertificate of division, C.C.E.D. Wis.
Holding
Indian tribes do not own the land their reservations are on, the land is owned by the United States and the Indians only have a right to occupy the land. They may not cut and sell timber merely for the purpose of selling timber, they may only sell timber that was cut incidental to another purpose. The government has a right to take action to recover damages for timber sold illegally from that land.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Morrison Waite
Associate Justices
Nathan Clifford · Noah H. Swayne
Samuel F. Miller · David Davis
Stephen J. Field · William Strong
Joseph P. Bradley · Ward Hunt
Case opinion
MajorityWaite, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Common law decision, based on replevin, waste, and Indian right of occupancy
Superseded by
Statute, 25 U.S.C. §§ 406–407, as stated in United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206 (1983).

Background

In 1831, the Menominee tribe turned over part of their reservation in Wisconsin to the United States for use by the Stockbridge Indians.[1] Some of the tribe cut timber and sold the logs to George Cook. The federal government brought an action in common law known as a writ of replevin to recover the logs from Cook. It came to the Supreme Court on a certificate of division. The only side to present an argument was the United States, Cook was not represented before the Court.[2]

Opinion of the Court
Author of the opinion, Chief Justice Morrison Waite

Chief Justice Morrison Waite delivered the opinion of the Court. Justice Waite stated that the title held by the Stockbridge tribe was one of occupancy only, that the United States held the fee title to the land.[3] Justice Waite noted that this had been decided in Johnson v. M'Intosh[4] 50 years earlier, in 1823.[5] The Indians were not allowed to cut and sell lumber under the legal principal of waste.[6] If they were clearing land for agriculture, they could sell the lumber as an incidental byproduct of the improvement to the land.[7] The sale must be incidental to the improvement, and if not, the federal government may take legal action to recover the lumber.[8]

Subsequent developments

This principle of waste and sale of material from reservation land was changed in 1920, when Congress passed a law authorizing the sale of timber for the benefit of the tribes.[9]

References

The citations in this article are written in Bluebook style. Please see the talk page for more information.

  1. United States v. Cook, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 591, 592 (1873).
  2. Cook, 86 U.S. at 591.
  3. Cook, 86 U.S. at 592-93; citing Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 1, 48 (1831).
  4. Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543, 574 (1823).
  5. Cook, 86 U.S. at 593.
  6. Cook, 86 U.S. at 594.
  7. Cook, 86 U.S. at 593-94.
  8. Cook, 86 U.S. at 594, citing Cotton v. United States, 52 U.S. (11 How.) 229 (1851).
  9. Act of June 25, 1910, 36 Stat. 855 (codified as amended at 25 U.S.C. §§ 406–407); see also United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 219 (1983).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.