Ukraine Support Act

The Ukraine Support Act (H.R. 4278) would state U.S. policy supporting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a democratic Ukraine, and in condemning Russia's armed invasion of Ukraine and its illegal occupation of Crimea.[1] The bill would offer loan guarantees, offer various types of aid, and place sanctions on people who were "responsible for or engaged in actions that undermine democratic processes in Ukraine or that threaten its peace or territorial integrity, acts of significant corruption in Ukraine, or the commission of serious human rights abuses."[1][2]

Ukraine Support Act
Full titleTo support the independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of Ukraine, and for other purposes.
Introduced in113th United States Congress
Introduced onMarch 21, 2014
Sponsored byRep. Edward R. Royce (R, CA-39)
Number of co-sponsors1
Effects and codifications
U.S.C. section(s) affected8 U.S.C. § 1101, 50 U.S.C. § 1701, 22 U.S.C. § 2151, 22 U.S.C. § 2763, 50 U.S.C. § 1705, and others.
Agencies affectedOverseas Private Investment Corporation, Broadcasting Board of Governors, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, United States House of Representatives, Executive Office of the President, United States Congress, United States Department of State, United States Department of the Treasury, United States Department of Defense, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Department of Homeland Security
Authorizations of appropriations$68 million; offset by removing $70 million from another program
Legislative history

The bill was introduced into the United States House of Representatives during the 113th United States Congress. Other bills attempting to provide support for Ukraine included the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (S. 2124; 113th Congress) and the To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine (H.R. 4152; 113th Congress).[3][4]

Background
Main articles: 2014 Ukrainian revolution, 2014 Crimean crisis, and 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine

The 2014 Ukrainian revolution[5][6] began with civil unrest in Kiev, Ukraine, as part of Ukraine's ongoing Euromaidan protest movement against the government.[7] The conflict escalated rapidly, leading to the downfall of the government of President Viktor Yanukovych and the setting up of a new government to replace it within a few days.[5] Yanukovych fled to Russia,[8] and is wanted in Ukraine for the killing of protesters.[9] The conflict continued with the 2014 Crimean crisis when Russian forces seized control of the Crimea region.[10]

The 2014 Crimean crisis began in late February 2014 in the aftermath of the Ukrainian Revolution, when—after months of protests by Euromaidan and days of violent clashes between protesters and police in the Ukrainian capital Kiev—the President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, fled the capital on February 21.[11] The Verkhovna Rada (the parliament of Ukraine) subsequently voted unanimously to impeach Yanukovych.[12][13] This was followed by the interim appointment of the Yatsenyuk Government, as well as the appointment of a new Acting President of Ukraine, Oleksandr Turchynov. However, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said President Yanukovych was illegally impeached and that Russia continues to regard him as Ukraine's legitimate president.[14][lower-alpha 1] Russia describes the Yatsenyk government as "self-proclaimed" and the events in Kiev as a "coup d'etat".[14][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 4] Yanukovych supporters point out that not enough members of the parliament were present for the vote to reach the three-fourths majority required to impeach a President according to the Constitution of Ukraine.[19][20]

Beginning on February 26, pro-Russian forces gradually took control of the Crimean peninsula. Russia claimed that the uniformed men were local self-defense forces, but they are generally claimed in Western media to be Russian military personnel without insignia.[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]

On February 28, President Barack Obama's statement was released warning Russia not to intervene in Crimea. The statement said that President Obama is "deeply concerned by reports of military movements taken by the Russian Federation inside of Ukraine." It added that "any violation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity would be deeply destabilizing, which is not in the interest of Ukraine, Russia, or Europe" and that it would be "a clear violation of Russia's commitment to respect the independence and sovereignty and borders of Ukraine, and of international laws."[29]

On March 1, Obama held a phone conversation with Putin and said that the Russian invasion was a "violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity ... [and a] breach of international law." He warned of "greater political and economic isolation" and threatened to withdraw the United States from the 40th G8 summit chaired by Russia.[30]

Barack Obama talks on the phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin about Ukraine, March 1, 2014

Secretary of State John Kerry then labeled and condemned Russia's "invasion" of Ukraine on March 2 in an interview for Face the Nation. He called it an "incredible act of aggression," and said that "you just don't in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pretext."[31]

On March 3, National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden announced that the United States would not send a presidential delegation to the 2014 Winter Paralympics in Sochi (which was to be led by Tammy Duckworth), "in addition to other measures we are taking in response to the situation in Ukraine." As with the British boycott effort, it will not affect the country's participation in the Games themselves.[32]

On March 5, 2014, U.S. Representative Hal Rogers introduced the bill To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine (H.R. 4152; 113th Congress), a bill that would provide loan guarantees to Ukraine of up to $1 billion, part of the American response to the 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine.[33] On March 6, 2014, the House voted in Roll Call Vote 114 to pass the bill 385–23.[34] On March 25, 2014, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid indicated that United States Senate would vote on this bill on March 27, 2014, but only after amending it to include provisions that would put sanctions "against anyone deemed by the president to have undermined Ukraine's security or independence, or to have engaged in corruption in Ukraine or Russia."[33]

On March 6, Obama signed Executive Order 13660, Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, authorizing sanctions against persons who, being determined by the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Secretary of State, have violated or assisted in the violation of Ukraine's sovereignty.[35][36]

On March 11, the Supreme Council of Crimea and the City Council of Sevastopol adopted a joint resolution expressing their intention to unilaterally declare Crimea's independence from Ukraine as a single united nation with the possibility of joining the Russian Federation as a federal subject. In a referendum on March 16, officials said that nearly 96% of those who voted in Crimea supported joining Russia.[37] Election officials said the turnout was a record high,[38] although many Tatars and opponents of the referendum were reported to have boycotted the vote.[39] On March 17, the Crimean parliament officially declared its independence from Ukraine and requested to join the Russian Federation.[40] On March 18, President Putin reclaimed Crimea as a part of Russia on both moral and material grounds, citing the principle of self-determination and Crimea's strategic importance for Russia.[41]

On March 12, 2014, U.S. Senator Robert Menendez introduced the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (S. 2124; 113th Congress), a bill that would provide funds to implement a U.S. quota increase at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), rescind other funds previously appropriated for the IMF, and provide or authorize various forms of assistance to Ukraine and the surrounding region.[3] It would require sanctions on individuals responsible for violence, corruption, human rights abuses, or undermining stability in Ukraine, and would authorize sanctions on certain individuals in Russia.[3] On March 24, 2014, the Senate voted 78–17 to advance the bill to floor consideration.[42] Consideration of the bill was withdrawn, however, the next day, after a decision by Majority Leader Harry Reid.[33] Instead of continuing with this bill and its controversial International Monetary Fund provisions, the Senate was to take up a House-passed bill already offering Ukraine loan guarantees, amending it to add sanctions provisions.[33]

The Ukrainian parliament has stated that the referendum is unconstitutional.[43] The United States and the European Union said they consider the vote to be illegal, and warned that there may be repercussions for the Crimean ballot.[44]

On 17 March, Obama signed Executive Order 13661, Blocking Property of Additional Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, which expanded the scope of the previous sanctions imposed by EO 13660, to include the freezing of certain Russian government officials' assets in the US and blocking their entry into the US.[45]

Provisions of the bill

This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, a public domain source.[1]

The Ukraine Support Act would state U.S. policy supporting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a democratic Ukraine, and in condemning Russia's armed intervention into Ukraine and its illegal annexation of Crimea.[1]

The bill would authorize and encourage the President of the United States to provide assistance to support democracy and civil society in Ukraine by: (1) improving democratic governance and anti-corruption efforts; (2) supporting Ukrainian efforts to foster greater unity among people and regions of the country, combat anti-Semitism, and promote respect for religious freedom; (3) supporting the people and government of Ukraine in conducting free and fair elections; (4) assisting Ukraine in diversifying its economy, trade, and energy supplies; and (5) expanding access to independent media and assisting with the protection of journalists and civil society activists.[1]

The bill would state that it shall be U.S. policy to work with other countries and international institutions to stabilize and reform Ukraine's economy.[1]

The bill would express the sense of Congress that U.S. loan guarantees for Ukraine should be used to promote anti-corruption efforts and government, banking, and energy sector reforms.[1]

The bill would direct Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Incorporated, and the Voice of America (VOA) service to Ukraine and neighboring regions to: (1) provide accurate and accessible news and information; (2) emphasize investigative and analytical journalism to highlight misinformation provided by Russian or pro-Russian media outlets; (3) prioritize programming to target populations and areas where access to uncensored information is limited, especially populations serviced by Russian supported media outlets; (4) increase the number of reporters and organizational presence in eastern Ukraine, especially in Crimea; (5) promote democratic processes, human rights, freedom of the press, and territorial sovereignty; (6) increase programming and content services to Russia; and (7) partner with private sector broadcasters and affiliates to increase distribution.[1]

The bill would authorize FY2014 appropriations for programming in the Ukrainian, Balkan, Russian, and Tatar language services of RFE/RL, Incorporated, and VOA.[1]

The bill would express the sense of Congress that the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) should prioritize investments in Ukraine.[1]

The bill would state that it shall be U.S. policy to assist Ukraine foster a democratically reformed police force.[1]

The bill would direct the United States Secretary of State to seek to provide enhanced security cooperation with Central and Eastern European North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member states.[1]

The bill would express the sense of Congress that: (1) specified U.S. assistance to Ukraine under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act should continue, (2) the President is encouraged to draw down United States Department of Defense (DOD) stocks in order to provide non-lethal assistance to the government of Ukraine, and (3) the Administration should conclude its current review of security assistance for the government of Ukraine.[1]

The bill would express the sense of Congress that: (1) the Administration should provide assistance to the government of Ukraine to recover assets stolen from the government of Ukraine or linked to acts of corruption by former President Viktor Yanukovych, members of his family, and other former or current Ukrainian government officials; and (2) the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development should increase investments in Ukraine and cease new investments in the Russian Federation.[1]

The bill would continue specified property-blocking sanctions against certain persons contributing to the situation in Ukraine.[1]

The bill would impose asset and visa/entry sanctions against a foreign person or an alien who on or after November 21, 2013: (1) is responsible for or engaged in actions that undermine democratic processes in Ukraine or that threaten its peace or territorial integrity, acts of significant corruption in Ukraine, or the commission of serious human rights abuses; (2) is a current or former senior official of the Russian Federation who has engaged in any such activity; (3) operates in the arms sector in the Russian Federation that has engaged in any such activity; (4) is a current or former leader of an entity that has engaged in any such activity, or of an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this Act; (5) has materially assisted or provided financial, material, or technological support for any such activity, or of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this Act; or (6) is owned or controlled by, or has acted for or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this Act.[1]

The bill would subject violators of such provisions to specified penalties.[1]

The bill would authorize the President to waive the imposition of such sanctions if in the U.S. national interest.[1]

The bill would terminate sanctions under this Act at the earlier of: (1) 90 days after the President certifies to Congress that Ukrainian sovereignty is not being violated by the Russian Federation or any other state, or (2) 30 days after any date subsequent to January 1, 2020, on which the President submits to Congress a determination that sanctions termination is in U.S. national security interests.[1]

The bill would direct the Secretary of State and the United States Secretary of the Treasury to jointly report to Congress every 180 days for a period not to exceed 2 years regarding foreign financial institutions that: (1) control government of Ukraine state-owned or controlled assets without such government's knowledge; (2) may be complicit in financial activities prohibited under U.S law that are organized under the laws of the Russian Federation, or owned or controlled by a foreign person subject to additional sanctions under this Act; and (3) are aiding the violation of Ukrainian sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity, including, the Crimea.[1]

The bill would amend the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act to require the President to fully implement the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act, including sanctions against Russian companies.[1]

The bill would express the sense of Congress that the President should expand the list of 18 Russian officials and others who were engaged in certain actions regarding the death of Sergei Magnitsky, illegal activity by officials of the Russian Federation, or violations of human rights.[1]

Authorizations of appropriations

The Ukraine Support Act would authorize appropriations of $68 million to spend on various projects in Ukraine. The House Republican Conference reports that the spending "is fully offset by a reduction in authorized assistance for Pakistan."[46] Section 101 authorizes the appropriation of $50 million for "support for democratic governance and civil society in Ukraine" such as support for fair elections.[47][48][49] Section 103(d) authorizes the appropriation of $10 million for radio and broadcast programming in local languages.[47] Finally, Section 105(b) authorizes the appropriations of $8 million for "enhanced assistance for law enforcement and the judicial system" in Ukraine.[47] Section 110 offsets this potential spending by reducing the amounts authorized in the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009.[47] The amendment to the Pakistan bill reduces by $70,000,000 the amounts available in each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014, for a total reduction in Pakistan-related budget authority of $350,000,000. As prior year funds have probably been spent, the result will be a reduction of $70,000,000 in current-year (2014) Pakistan spending.

Procedural history

The Ukraine Support Act was introduced into the United States House of Representatives on March 21, 2014 by Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA).[50] It was referred to the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the United States House Committee on the Judiciary.[50]

Debate and discussion

This bill is one of several different attempts to provide aid to Ukraine and sanctions on those responsible for the violence there. One of the sticking points regarding previous bills was the desire of Senate Democrats to include provisions that would reform the International Monetary Fund, provisions that were opposed by House Republicans.[2] In order to ensure that aid for Ukraine was finally passed, the Democrats agreed to drop their requirement for those provisions, which is one of the reasons why those provisions were not included in this bill.[2] One of the bill versions with the unpopular IMF provisions was the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (S. 2124; 113th Congress).[3]

See also

Notes
  1. Lally; Englund (2014) "The current government is illegitimate, Russia contends, because Yanukovych was not properly removed from power in a formal impeachment."[15]
  2. Gumuchian; Morgan; Chance (2014) "Moscow has denounced the events that led to Yanukovych's ouster as an illegitimate coup and has refused to recognize the new Ukrainian authorities, putting the two countries on a collision course over control of Crimea, which has longstanding ties to Russia and has thousands of Russian troops stationed there."[16]
  3. Dawber (2014) "Vladimir Putin has given a confident performance in front of the media, insisting that the events of the last 10 days in Ukraine amounted to nothing less than a coup d’état."[17]
  4. The Washington Post (2014) "[Putin says:] Are the current authorities legitimate? The Parliament is partially, but all the others are not. The current Acting President is definitely not legitimate. There is only one legitimate President, from a legal standpoint. Clearly, he has no power. However, as I have already said, and will repeat: Yanukovych is the only undoubtedly legitimate President."[18]

References
  1. "H.R. 4278 - Summary". United States Congress. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
  2. Kasperowicz, Pete (27 March 2014). "Thursday: Doc fix and Ukraine". The Hill. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
  3. "S. 2124 - CBO Cost Estimate" (PDF). Congressional Budget Office. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  4. "H.R. 4152 - Summary". United States Congress. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
  5. Damien McElroy (23 February 2014). "Ukraine revolution: live – Ukraine's president has disappeared as world awakes to the aftermath of a revolution". The Daily Telegraph.
  6. "Ukraine conflict: Tymoshenko speech ends historic day of revolution". BBC News. 22 February 2014.
    Neil Buckley and Roman Olearchyk (22 February 2014). "Yanukovich toppled in new Ukrainian revolution". Financial Times.
  7. "Yanukovych: The man who sparks revolution in Ukraine". Yahoo! News. Agence France-Presse. 20 February 2014. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008.
  8. Myers, Steven Lee. "Ousted Ukrainian Leader, Reappearing in Russia, Says, 'Nobody Deposed Me'". New York Times. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  9. "Ukraine's Yanukovich wanted for mass murder". Euronews. 24 February 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  10. Sullivan, Tim (1 March 2014). "Russian troops take over Ukraine's Crimea region". Associated Press.
  11. Booth, William (22 February 2014). "Ukraine's Yanukovych missing as protesters take control of presidential residence in Kiev". Washington Post. Retrieved 23 March 2014.
  12. "Update: The Ukrainian Parliament declared that President Yanukovych has failed to perform his duties hence he is relieved from the post of president" Forbes What Does The Future Hold For Ukraine
  13. Parliament votes 328-0 to impeach Yanukovych on Feb. 22; sets May 25 for new election; Tymoshenko free (VIDEO) Feb. 23, 2014, 2:39 a.m. https://www.kyivpost.com/content/kyiv/euromaidan-rallies-in-ukraine-feb-21-live-updates-337287.html
  14. United Nations News Centre - UN Security Council action on Crimea referendum blocked
  15. Lally, Kathy; Englund, Will (4 March 2014). "Putin defends Ukraine stance, cites lawlessness". The Washington Post. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
  16. Gumuchian, Marie-Louise; Morgan, Kellie; Chance, Matthew (10 March 2014). "Demonstrators rally as Crimea crisis mounts". CNN. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
  17. Dawber, Alistair (5 March 2014). "Ukraine crisis: How do you solve a problem like Crimea?". The Independent. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
  18. "Transcript: Putin defends Russian intervention in Ukraine". The Washington Post. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
  19. https://huffingtonpost.com/john-feffer/who-are-these-people-anyw_b_4964526.html Who Are These 'People,' Anyway?
  20. Sindelar, Daisy (February 23, 2014). "Was Yanukovych's Ouster Constitutional?". Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty (Rferl.org). Retrieved February 25, 2014.
  21. "Warning shots end OSCE Crimea entry bid - Europe". Al Jazeera English. Retrieved 2014-03-11.
  22. "Ukraine crisis: Russia vows troops will stay". BBC. 3 March 2014. Retrieved 3 March 2014.
  23. Jones, Sam (21 February 2014). "US scorns Russia's version of Crimean intervention". Financial Times.
  24. "OSCE team say Crimea roadblock gunmen threatened to shoot at them". Reuters. Retrieved 2014-03-14.
  25. "Gunmen Seize Government Buildings in Crimea". The New York Times. 27 February 2014. Retrieved 1 March 2014. Masked men with guns seized government buildings in the capital of Ukraine's Crimea region on Thursday, barricading themselves inside and raising the Russian flag after mysterious overnight raids that appeared to be the work of militant Russian nationalists who want this volatile Black Sea region ruled from Moscow.
  26. "Armed men seize two airports in Ukraine's Crimea, Yanukovich reappears". Reuters. 1 March 2014. Archived from the original on 28 February 2014.
  27. "Putin ready to invade Ukraine; Kiev warns of war". Reuters. 1 March 2014{{inconsistent citations}}
  28. "Telecom services sabotaged in Ukraine's Crimea region". United Press International. Retrieved 28 February 2014.
  29. "Statement by the President on Ukraine". White House. 28 February 2014. Retrieved 1 March 2014.
  30. DeYoung, Karen (1 March 2014). "Obama speaks with Putin by phone, calls on Russia to pull forces back to Crimea bases". Washington Post. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  31. "Kerry condemns Russia's 'incredible act of aggression' in Ukraine". Reuters. 2 March 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  32. "USA won't send presidential delegation to Sochi Paralympics". USA Today. Retrieved 3 March 2014.
  33. Cox, Ramsey (25 March 2014). "Reid sets up Ukraine vote for Thursday". The Hill. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
  34. "H.R. 4152 - All Actions". United States Congress. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
  35. "Executive Order 13660 -- Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine" (Press release). White House Office of the Press Secretary. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
  36. "Sanctions: US and EU action on Ukraine" (PDF). pwc.com. PwC Financial Services Regulatory Practice, March, 2014.
  37. Crimea Applies to Join Russia
  38. Crimea referendum: Voters 'back Russia union', BBC, March 16, 2014
  39. Crimea election chief reports 95% vote to secede, half of ballots counted CBC Retrieved on March 16, 2014
  40. Crimean parliament formally applies to join Russia, BBC, March 17, 2014
  41. Uriel Abulof, Self-Determination, Redux?, Huffingtonpost, March 20, 2014
  42. Ramsey Cox; Erik Wasson (24 March 2014). "Senate advanced Ukraine aid package". The Hill. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  43. "Ukraine crisis: Russia isolated in UN Crimea vote". BBC. 15 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  44. Obama: US, EU Prepared to Penalize Russia for Crimea Ballot, VOA, March 16, 2014
  45. "Executive Order -- Blocking Property of Additional Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine" (Press release). The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 17 March 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
  46. "Legislative Digest on H.R. 4278". House Republican Conference. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
  47. "H.r. 4278 - Text - Engrossed in House". United States Congress. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
  48. Martin, Aaron (31 March 2014). "House advances Ukraine Support Act". Ripon Advance. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
  49. Zengerle, Patricia (21 March 2014). "Political dispute clouds prospects of U.S. aid to Ukraine". Reuters. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
  50. "H.R. 4278 - All Actions". United States Congress. Retrieved 26 March 2014.

 This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the United States Government.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.