Tibble v. Edison International
Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."[1]
| Tibble v. Edison International | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 24, 2015 Decided May 18, 2015 | |
| Full case name | Glenn Tibble, et al, Petitioners v. Edison International, et al. |
| Docket no. | 13–550 |
| Citations | 575 U.S. ___ (more) 135 S. Ct. 1823; 191 L. Ed. 2d 795 |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act | |
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Stephen Breyer authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.[2]
References
External links
- Text of Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. ___ (2015) is available from: CourtListener Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
- SCOTUSblog coverage
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.