Textus Roffensis

The Textus Roffensis (Latin for "The Tome of Rochester"), fully titled the Textus de Ecclesia Roffensi per Ernulphum episcopum ("The Tome of the Church of Rochester up to Bishop Ernulf") and sometimes also known as the Annals of Rochester, is a mediaeval manuscript that consists of two separate works written between 1122 and 1124. It is catalogued as "Rochester Cathedral Library, MS A.3.5" and is currently on display in a new exhibition at Rochester Cathedral, Rochester, Kent.[1] It is thought that the main text of both manuscripts was written by a single scribe, although the English glosses to the two Latin entries (items 23 and 24 in table below) were made by a second hand.[2] The annotations might indicate that the manuscript was consulted in some post-Conquest trials.[3] However, the glosses are very sparse and just clarify a few uncertain terms. For example, the entry on f. 67r merely explains that the triplex iudiciu(m) is called in English, ofraceth ordel (insult ordeal = triple ordeal).

The 'Annals of Rochester' redirects here. For other works known by that name, see Annals of Rochester (disambiguation).
First page of the Textus Roffensis. From Rochester Cathedral Library, MS A.3.5; now held in the Medway Studies Centre.

There is a clear, digitised version in the Rylands Medieval Collection.[4]

Contents

The first part is a collection of laws and other, primarily secular documents, whilst the second is the cartulary of the Cathedral priory.[5] The first part is of fundamental importance to the study of Anglo-Saxon law. It begins with the earliest surviving royal law-code, from King Æthelberht of Kent, dating to c 600, followed by those of two Kentish successors, the joint kings Hlothere and Eadric, c 679–685, and Wihtred, 695. This is the only manuscript source for these three laws, though Wihtred's are heavily reliant on the laws of the contemporary West-Saxon King, Ine (see item 6 below). The full contents of the first part are:

ItemDatesDescriptionManuscript Pages[6]Language
1c 600Æthelberht's Laws1r - 3vEnglish[7]
2c 679-695Hlothere and Eadric's Laws3v–5rEnglish
3695Wihtred's Laws5r–6vEnglish
4Early 11th Century[8]Hadbot (compensation for the ordained)7r–vEnglish
5?Lists of Kings (West-Saxon genealogy), Saints and Bishops7v–8vEnglish
6Probably after 893;[9] Laws of Ine, c. 694Laws of Alfred, (Alfred's Domboc), containing the Laws of his West-Saxon predecessor, Ine9r–32rEnglish
7?Ordal32r–vEnglish
8990sWalreaf (penalties for grave-robbery)32vEnglish
9924–939Æthelstan's Grately Law Code (II Aethelstan)32v–37rEnglish
10924–939Æthelstan's Exeter Law Code (V Aethelstan) and a fragment from the London Code (VI Æthelstan, 6)37r–38rEnglish
11990sPax ('Peace'), for use in Æthelred's Danelaw territories38rEnglish
12Early 11th CenturyMircna laga38v–39vEnglish
13c. early 11th Century[10]Fraudulent peace Treaty between Edward the Elder and Guthrum40r–41vEnglish
1410th Century?Wer (on bloodfeud)41v–42rEnglish
15899–924Edward the Elder's First Law Code42r–43rEnglish
16899–924Edward the Elder's Second Law Code43r–44rEnglish
17942–946Edmund's First Law Code (ecclesiastical laws)44r–45rEnglish
18942–946Edmund's Second Law Code45r–46rEnglish
19c 997Æthelred's First Law Code (Woodstock Code)[11]46r–47rEnglish
201066–1087Willelmes cyninges asetnysse (laws of William I dealing with lawsuits by Englishmen against Frenchmen)[12]47r–vEnglish
21997Æthelred's Third Law Code (Wantage Code)48r–49vEnglish
22Post-1066Judgement of God X (Iud Dei XV)49v–57rLatin
231016–1035a text of Cnut's reign57vLatin
241016–1035Institutes of Cnut (collection of laws)58r–80rLatin
251066–1087Articles of William I[13]80r–81vLatin
26?Accusatores (Papal decrees on accusers/ prosectors)81v–87rLatin
27c 1008Æthelstan's Sixth Law Code (London Code)[14]88r–93rEnglish
28?Geðyncðo (On status)93r–vEnglish
29No later than mid-10th CenturyNorðleoda laga (concerns wergeld in Northumbrian society[15]93v–94rEnglish
30?Wifmannes beweddung (Of a woman's betrothal)94v–95rEnglish
31?Cattle-Theft Charm95rEnglish
32?Hit becwæð (On bequests: 'he that owned it bequeathed it and died')[16]95r–vEnglish
331100Henry I's Coronation Charter96r–97vLatin
3410th–11th CenturyExcommunicatio VIII (laws on excommunication98r–99vLatin
35?Excommunicatio IX (formula for excommunicating criminals)99v–100rLatin
36?List of Kings100r–vEnglish
37?Lists of Kings, Saints, and Bishops: West-Saxon Genealogy102r–104rEnglish
38?Lists of Kings, Saints, and Bishops: Lists of Popes, Emperors, Patriarchs and English Archbishops and Bishops105r–116rEnglish
39?Lists: of 24 elders, of popes responsible for various liturgical reforms, and of 7 archangels116vLatin

The second part of Textus Roffensis is just over 100 pages long. It consists of the cartulary for Rochester Cathedral, in Latin. However, its final entry (222r–v) is in English, listing the number of masses to be recited for those institutions in England and Normandy which were in confraternity with Rochester.[17]

Name

A textus was a book with a decorated cover suitable to be kept in the church by the high altar. The term does not mean a text concerning Rochester Cathedral. A liber was a less decorated book, suitable only for the cloister. It is rare that a secular book is a textus, and the name given to the Textus Roffensis by the cathedral is considered indicative of the book's importance during the Middle Ages.[18]

The Textus Roffensis Scribe

The unknown scribe was remarkable for his knowledge of old forms of English, and was able to transcribe accurately from a range of original manuscripts written in Anglo-Saxon dialects, including the local Kentish used for the laws of the kings of Kent. Two or more generations after the Norman Conquest, this was distinctly unusual.[19] Few of his records were contemporary and, to read the Laws of Aethelberht, he was looking back at an obsolete dialect of early Anglo-Saxon English, some 500 years old.

He followed standard practice of distinguishing between written English and written Latin. The overall aspect is Protogothic[20] with, for example, narrow letter-forms and forked tops to ascenders. However, he used a modified Insular Minuscule for the English and a modified Caroline Minuscule for the Latin. This was standard practice in the years around 1000, but proficiency in writing Insular Minuscule was in terminal decline by the time of the Textus Roffensis.[21]

The double-page opening of f95v and f96r is a good place to examine differences in the two scripts. The left-hand page contains the end of Hit becƿæð. ond becƿæl in English and the right-hand page the start of Henry I's Coronation Charter, in Latin. It is not only the general letter-shapes which show some differences. In the English, the only abbreviations are the tironian et for ond and the suspensions on dative endings e.g. beÞinū/ beminū for –um (concerning yours/ - mine). The number of abbreviations, suspensions and ligatures in the Latin give a different look, accentuated by different letter-forms, such as g, h and r in gehyrde (f.95v, line 11) and erga uos habeo (f.96r, line 9); the f in forðam (English, line 10) and in facio (Latin, line 10)[22]

The Roffensis scribe made remarkably few errors and only some minor edits which lightly modernise the text.[23] This can be seen in the Laws of Ine. The original laws were written in the late 7th Century. They were already updated when recorded in Alfred's Domboc two centuries later. The earliest preserved version is from c. 925.[24] In clause 2, this has Cild binnan ðritegum nihta sie gefulwad ('a child shall be baptised within thirty days'). The scribe substitutes for the tenth-century term for baptism (gefulwad) the twelfth-century term gefullod. Similarly, the scribe substitutes þeow (slave) for Alfred's fioh (wealth). There is some dispute whether this reflects the changing position of slaves after the Conquest or whether it is just correcting the term, since slaves were chattels.[25]

Overall, the Roffensis scribe treated his sources with respect. He did not, for example, make erroneous 'corrections' to the Old English law texts, unlike the 'incompetent translations of Quadripartitus's author'.[26]

History

The two manuscripts were bound together in around 1300.[18]The first part is a collection of documents which includes the Law of Æthelberht, attributed to Æthelberht of Kent (c. 560–616), and the 1100 coronation charter of Henry I of England. The Law of Æthelberht is the oldest surviving English law code and the oldest Anglo-Saxon text in existence. The second part of the Textus Roffensis is the oldest of the Rochester Cathedral registers. The entire volume consists of 235 vellum leaves.[18][27]

Over the centuries, the Textus Roffensis has been loaned, lost and recovered on several occasions and has been in the custody of a variety of different people and places: was once held at the Medway Archives Office in Strood under reference number DRc/R1 and has since been withdrawn. It is currently held in the in an airtight case in the Cathedral’s Crypt.[28] Sometime between 1708 and 1718 the book was immersed for several hours in either the River Thames or the River Medway when the ship transporting it overturned; water damage is apparent on a number of pages.[18]

The book was named 'Britain's Hidden Treasure' by the British Library, and was the subject of a conference at the University of Kent in 2010.[27] It has been digitised and published on line by The University of Manchester's Centre for Heritage Imaging and Collection Care.[29] The full digital facsimile is available through Rochester Cathedral's website.[28]

A short film was also produced about the book by Rochester Cathedral about its history and digitization process. [30]

Footnotes
  1. It was deposited in the Kent Archives Office in Maidstone in 1969, and was transferred to the Medway office in 1992 following its creation.
  2. Treharne, Textus Roffensis.
  3. Nicholas Kar, 'Information and Its Retrieval' in Julia Crick and Elisabeth van Houts (eds.), A Social History of England, 900-–1200, 375
  4. "Manchester Digital". enriqueta.man.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  5. "Rochester, Cathedral Library, A. 3. 5. - The Production and Use of English Manuscripts: 1060 to 1220". www.le.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  6. "Rochester, Cathedral Library, A. 3. 5. - The Production and Use of English Manuscripts: 1060 to 1220". www.le.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  7. The definitive translation of items 1 - 3 is now Lisi Oliver, The Beginnings of English Law (Toronto, 2002); digital version available at http://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/laws/texts/abt/view/#edition/commentary-7
  8. "Early English Laws: Hadbot (Had)". www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  9. "Early English Laws: Alfred's domboc (Af)". www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  10. Not from the reign of Edward (899–924) but a fraud, probably written by Archbishop Wulfstan (1002–1023): http://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/laws/texts/egu/
  11. "Early English Laws: Æthelred's Woodstock code (I Atr)". www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  12. The only surviving version is in Textus Roffensis: http://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/laws/texts/wl-lad/
  13. Not entirely William's actual laws: see http://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/laws/texts/wl-art/
  14. Textus Roffensis is the only source: http://www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk/laws/texts/vi-as/
  15. "Early English Laws: Norðleoda laga (Norðleod)". www.earlyenglishlaws.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  16. "'be-cwelan' - Bosworth–Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary". www.bosworthtoller.com. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  17. "Rochester, Cathedral Library, A. 3. 5. - The Production and Use of English Manuscripts: 1060 to 1220". www.le.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
  18. "The Textus Roffensis". Medway Council. Archived from the original on July 17, 2011.
  19. Julia Crick, 'English Vernacular Script' in R. Gameson (ed.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 1 (2011), 185–6
  20. http://www.le.ac.uk/english/em1060to1220/mss/EM.RCL.htm, 'Hand Description'
  21. Julia Crick, 'English Vernacular Script' in R. Gameson (ed.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 1 (2011)
  22. For image, see the digitised manuscript: http://enriqueta.man.ac.uk/luna/servlet/detail/Man4MedievalVC~4~4~990378~142729?qvq=q:%3DTextus%2BRoffensis%2B&mi=0&trs=2
  23. For details, see Stefan Jurasinski, 'Scribal Malpractice and the Study of Anglo-Saxon Law in the Twelfth Century' in B. R. O'Brien and B. Bombi (eds.), Textus Roffensis Law, Language, and Libraries in Early Medieval England (2015), 83–101
  24. Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 173, ff. 47r-52v
  25. Jurasinski, 99
  26. Jurasinski, 99, 94
  27. University of Kent, "England’s 'Hidden Treasure'."
  28. "Leaf Through the Textus Roffensis". July 17, 2020. Retrieved 1 Dec 2020.
  29. "A book 100 years older than the Magna Carta goes digital". University of Manchester.
  30. Phil Smethurst (Nov 5, 2014). "The Textus Roffensis A Hidden Treasure". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 1 Dec 2020.

Sources

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.