Taylor Review
The Taylor Review with the full title Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices (July 2017) was a review submitted to the UK government concerning employee and worker rights in UK labour law. It was chaired by Matthew Taylor, Chief Executive of the Royal Society of the Arts. Its aim was "to consider how employment practices need to change in order to keep pace with modern business models" and the report made a series of recommendations for reform.[1] The final report was published on 11 July 2017 as a 116-page PDF document, alongside many invited submissions, released in full.[2]
Contents
Table of contents for Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices.
Chapter 1 Foreword Chapter 2 Our approach Chapter 3 Quality of work Chapter 4 Evolution of the labour market Chapter 5 Clarity in the law Chapter 6 One-sided flexibility Chapter 7 Responsible business Chapter 8 Fairer enforcement Chapter 9 Incentives in the system Chapter 10 A new offer to the self-employed Chapter 11 Scope for development Chapter 12 Opportunity to progress Chapter 13 Embedding lasting change Chapter 14 Seven Point Plan Chapter 15 References
Considerable attention is given to the regulatory and taxation status of the component of the workforce who are either legitimately self-employed or who claim self-employment against the grain of existing labour law, for a variety of reasons.
The report advocates the retention of worker status, but in order to reduce confusion among those who claim this, recommends renaming this status to "Dependent Contractor".
Notes
- Employment Practices in the Modern Economy, accessed 18 September 2018
- Taylor, Matthew (11 July 2017). "Good work: the Taylor review of modern working practices". gov.uk. UK Crown Press. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
References
- Institute of Employment Rights, 'Our Guide to the Taylor Review' (13 July 2017)
- E McGaughey, 'Uber Fraud, Mutuality and the Taylor Review' (2017) Industrial Law Journal
- E McGaughey, 'Taylorooism: when network technology meets corporate power' (2018) 49(5-6) Industrial Relations Journal 459