Substantial certainty doctrine

In law, the substantial certainty doctrine is the assumption of intent even if the actor did not intend the result, but knew with substantial certainty the effect would occur as a result of his action.[1] The doctrine can be used by courts as a test to determine whether or not a defendant committed a tort. For example, in Garratt v. Dailey (1955), the Washington Supreme Court remanded a case back to the lower courts to determine whether or not the five year-old defendant "knew with substantial certainty that the plaintiff would attempt to sit down where the chair which he moved had been."[2]

References
  1. "Substantial Certainty Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc". definitions.uslegal.com. Retrieved 2020-08-25.
  2. Garratt v. Dailey - 46 Wash. 2d 197, 279 P.2d 1091 (1955)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.