Quasi-bialgebra

In mathematics, quasi-bialgebras are a generalization of bialgebras: they were first defined by the Ukrainian mathematician Vladimir Drinfeld in 1990. A quasi-bialgebra differs from a bialgebra by having coassociativity replaced by an invertible element ${\displaystyle \Phi }$ which controls the non-coassociativity. One of their key properties is that the corresponding category of modules forms a tensor category.

Definition

A quasi-bialgebra ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B_{A}}}=({\mathcal {A}},\Delta ,\varepsilon ,\Phi ,l,r)}$ is an algebra ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}}$ over a field ${\displaystyle \mathbb {F} }$ equipped with morphisms of algebras

${\displaystyle \Delta$ :{\mathcal {A}}\rightarrow {\mathcal {A\otimes A}}}

${\displaystyle \varepsilon$ :{\mathcal {A}}\rightarrow \mathbb {F} }

along with invertible elements ${\displaystyle \Phi \in {\mathcal {A\otimes A\otimes A}}}$, and ${\displaystyle r,l\in A}$ such that the following identities hold:

${\displaystyle (id\otimes \Delta )\circ \Delta (a)=\Phi \lbrack (\Delta \otimes id)\circ \Delta (a)\rbrack \Phi ^{-1},\quad \forall a\in {\mathcal {A}}}$

${\displaystyle \lbrack (id\otimes id\otimes \Delta )(\Phi )\rbrack \ \lbrack (\Delta \otimes id\otimes id)(\Phi )\rbrack =(1\otimes \Phi )\ \lbrack (id\otimes \Delta \otimes id)(\Phi )\rbrack \ (\Phi \otimes 1)}$

${\displaystyle (\varepsilon \otimes id)(\Delta a)=l^{-1}al,\qquad (id\otimes \varepsilon )\circ \Delta =r^{-1}ar,\quad \forall a\in {\mathcal {A}}}$

${\displaystyle (id\otimes \varepsilon \otimes id)(\Phi )=r\otimes l^{-1}.}$

Where ${\displaystyle \Delta }$ and ${\displaystyle \epsilon }$ are called the comultiplication and counit, ${\displaystyle r}$ and ${\displaystyle l}$ are called the right and left unit constraints (resp.), and ${\displaystyle \Phi }$ is sometimes called the Drinfeld associator.[1]^:369–376 This definition is constructed so that the category ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}-Mod}$ is a tensor category under the usual vector space tensor product, and in fact this can be taken as the definition instead of the list of above identities.[1]^:368 Since many of the quasi-bialgebras that appear "in nature" have trivial unit constraints, ie. ${\displaystyle l=r=1}$ the definition may sometimes be given with this assumed.[1]^:370 Note that a bialgebra is just a quasi-bialgebra with trivial unit and associativity constraints: ${\displaystyle l=r=1}$ and ${\displaystyle \Phi =1\otimes 1\otimes 1}$.

Braided quasi-bialgebras

A braided quasi-bialgebra (also called a quasi-triangular quasi-bialgebra) is a quasi-bialgebra whose corresponding tensor category ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}-Mod}$ is braided. Equivalently, by analogy with braided bialgebras, we can construct a notion of a universal R-matrix which controls the non-cocommutativity of a quasi-bialgebra. The definition is the same as in the braided bialgebra case except for additional complications in the formulas caused by adding in the associator.

Proposition: A quasi-bialgebra ${\displaystyle ({\mathcal {A}},\Delta ,\epsilon ,\Phi ,l,r)}$ is braided if it has a universal R-matrix, ie an invertible element ${\displaystyle R\in {\mathcal {A\otimes A}}}$ such that the following 3 identities hold:

${\displaystyle (\Delta ^{op})(a)=R\Delta (a)R^{-1}}$

${\displaystyle (id\otimes \Delta )(R)=(\Phi _{231})^{-1}R_{13}\Phi _{213}R_{12}(\Phi _{213})^{-1}}$

${\displaystyle (\Delta \otimes id)(R)=(\Phi _{321})R_{13}(\Phi _{213})^{-1}R_{23}\Phi _{123}}$

Where, for every ${\displaystyle a_{1}\otimes ...\otimes a_{k}\in {\mathcal {A}}^{\otimes k}}$, ${\displaystyle a_{i_{1}i_{2}...i_{n}}}$ is the monomial with ${\displaystyle a_{j}}$ in the ${\displaystyle i_{j}}$th spot, where any omitted numbers correspond to the identity in that spot. Finally we extend this by linearity to all of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}^{\otimes k}}$.[1]^:371

Again, similar to the braided bialgebra case, this universal R-matrix satisfies (a non-associative version of) the Yang–Baxter equation:

${\displaystyle R_{12}\Phi _{321}R_{13}(\Phi _{132})^{-1}R_{23}\Phi _{123}=\Phi _{321}R_{23}(\Phi _{231})^{-1}R_{13}\Phi _{213}R_{12}}$[1]^:372

Twisting

Given a quasi-bialgebra, further quasi-bialgebras can be generated by twisting (from now on we will assume ${\displaystyle r=l=1}$) .

If ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B_{A}}}}$ is a quasi-bialgebra and ${\displaystyle F\in {\mathcal {A\otimes A}}}$ is an invertible element such that ${\displaystyle (\varepsilon \otimes id)F=(id\otimes \varepsilon )F=1}$, set

${\displaystyle \Delta '(a)=F\Delta (a)F^{-1},\quad \forall a\in {\mathcal {A}}}$

${\displaystyle \Phi '=(1\otimes F)\ ((id\otimes \Delta )F)\ \Phi \ ((\Delta \otimes id)F^{-1})\ (F^{-1}\otimes 1).}$

Then, the set ${\displaystyle ({\mathcal {A}},\Delta ',\varepsilon ,\Phi ')}$ is also a quasi-bialgebra obtained by twisting ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B_{A}}}}$ by F, which is called a twist or gauge transformation.[1]^:373 If ${\displaystyle ({\mathcal {A}},\Delta ,\varepsilon ,\Phi )}$ was a braided quasi-bialgebra with universal R-matrix ${\displaystyle R}$ , then so is ${\displaystyle ({\mathcal {A}},\Delta ',\varepsilon ,\Phi ')}$ with universal R-matrix ${\displaystyle F_{21}RF^{-1}}$ (using the notation from the above section).[1]^:376 However, the twist of a bialgebra is only in general a quasi-bialgebra. Twistings fulfill many expected properties. For example, twisting by ${\displaystyle F_{1}}$ and then ${\displaystyle F_{2}}$ is equivalent to twisting by ${\displaystyle F_{2}F_{1}}$, and twisting by ${\displaystyle F}$ then ${\displaystyle F^{-1}}$ recovers the original quasi-bialgebra.

Twistings have the important property that they induce categorical equivalences on the tensor category of modules:

Theorem: Let ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B_{A}}}}$, ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B_{A'}}}}$ be quasi-bialgebras, let ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B'_{A'}}}}$ be the twisting of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B_{A'}}}}$ by ${\displaystyle F}$, and let there exist an isomorphism: ${\displaystyle \alpha$ :{\mathcal {B_{A}}}\to {\mathcal {B'_{A'}}}} . Then the induced tensor functor ${\displaystyle (\alpha ^{*},id,\phi _{2}^{F})}$ is a tensor category equivalence between ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A'}}-mod}$ and ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}-mod}$. Where ${\displaystyle \phi _{2}^{F}(v\otimes w)=F^{-1}(v\otimes w)}$. Moreover, if ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ is an isomorphism of braided quasi-bialgebras, then the above induced functor is a braided tensor category equivalence.[1]^:375–376

Usage

Quasi-bialgebras form the basis of the study of quasi-Hopf algebras and further to the study of Drinfeld twists and the representations in terms of F-matrices associated with finite-dimensional irreducible representations of quantum affine algebra. F-matrices can be used to factorize the corresponding R-matrix. This leads to applications in statistical mechanics, as quantum affine algebras, and their representations give rise to solutions of the Yang–Baxter equation, a solvability condition for various statistical models, allowing characteristics of the model to be deduced from its corresponding quantum affine algebra. The study of F-matrices has been applied to models such as the XXZ in the framework of the Algebraic Bethe ansatz.

See also

• Bialgebra
• Hopf algebra
• Quasi-Hopf algebra

References

1. C. Kassel. "Quantum Groups". Graduate Texts in Mathematics Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0387943706

Further reading

• Vladimir Drinfeld, Quasi-Hopf algebras, Leningrad Math J. 1 (1989), 1419-1457
• J.M. Maillet and J. Sanchez de Santos, Drinfeld Twists and Algebraic Bethe Ansatz, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. (2) Vol. 201, 2000