Proto-Afroasiatic language
Proto–Afroasiatic, sometimes referred to as Proto-Afrasian, is the reconstructed proto-language from which all modern Afroasiatic languages are descended. Though estimations vary widely, it is believed by scholars to have been spoken as a single language around 12,000 to 18,000 years ago (12 to 18 kya), that is, between 16,000 and 10,000 BC. The reconstruction of Proto-Afroasiatic is problematic and remains largely lacking. Moreover, no consensus exists as to the location of the Afroasiatic Urheimat, the putative homeland of Proto-Afroasiatic speakers.
| Proto-Afroasiatic | |
|---|---|
| Reconstruction of | Afroasiatic languages |
| Region | See #Urheimat |
| Era | ca. 16,000–10,000 BC |
| Lower-order reconstructions | |
Urheimat
A commonly proposed homeland is northeast Africa, particularly in or near Ethiopia, in part due to the presence of many branches of the family in and near that region (and in Africa).[1] According to others, words for fauna and flora and evidence of linguistic contact with language families known to have been spoken in Eurasia suggest that its home was in the Middle East, probably the Levant. Some geneticists and archaeologists have argued for a back migration of proto-Afroasiatic speakers from Western Asia to Africa as early as the 10th millennium BC. It has been suggested that the Natufian culture might have spoken a proto-Afroasian language just prior to its disintegration into sub-languages.[2] The hypothesis is supported by the Afroasiatic terms for early livestock and crops in the Anatolia and Iran, but would then imply that branches other than Semitic developed outside of the proposed homeland.[3] According to linguist Vaclav Blazek, the possibility a language similar to Cushitic being formerly spoken originally in the south of Arabia also speaks for a Middle Eastern origin.[4] But some recent proposals also posit Northern Africa or the Horn of Africa as possible places of origin.[5][6][7]
Consonant correspondences
The following table shows consonant correspondences in Afroasiatic languages, as given in Dolgopolsky (1999), along with some reconstructed consonants for Proto-Afroasiatic.
| Proto-Afroasiatic | Proto-Semitic | Egyptian | Berber | East Cushitic | West Chadic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *b | *b | b | *β, ? *b, *-∅- | *b | *b, *ḅ1 |
| *p | *p | p | *f, ? *b | *p | *p, *f, *ḅ1 |
| *f | f | f | |||
| *d | *d | d | *d | *d | *d, *ḍ1 |
| *t | *t | t | *t | *t | *t |
| *ṭ | *ṭ | d(~t) | *ḍ [dˁ] / *ṭ (→ *ṭṭ [tˁː]) | *ṭ (→ *ḍ) | *ḍ |
| *ǯ [dʒ] [10] | *ð | ?? d | *z | *z | *dʒ |
| *č [tʃ] [10] | *θ | s, ?? š | *s | *s3(=*s) | |
| *č̣ [tʃ'] [10] | *θ̣ | ḏ- | *ẓ [zˁ] | South Cushitic *ṭṣ |
|
| *ʒ [dz] [10] | *z | z | *z | *z | *dz |
| *c [ts] [10] | *s (*s3) | s | *s- ? | s1- | *ts |
| *c̣ [ts’] [10] | *ṣ [(t)sʼ] | ḏ | *ẓ [zˤ] | *ṭṣ | *ṭṣ |
| *s [10] | *š (*s1) | s | *s | *s1(=*š) | s, Central Chadic: *s, *ɬ |
| *ŝ [ɬ], *ĉ [tɬ] [10] | *ś (*s2) [ɬ] | š, ? s | *s, *z- | *l, SCush. *ɬ |
*ɬ, *ɮ |
| *ĉ̣ [tɬʼ] [10] | *ṣ́ [(t)ɬʼ] | ḏ, ? d- | *s2 ?, SCush. *ṭɬ̣ |
-*ṭɬ̣- | |
| *g [10] | *g | g, ḏ | *g | *g | *g |
| *k [10] | *k | k, ṯ | *k, ? *ɣ | *k | *k |
| *ḳ [10] | *ḳ | q, ḏ | *ɣ, ? *ḳ (→ *ḳḳ [kˤː]) | ||
| *ɣ [10] | *ɣ | ḫ-, ꜥ- ? | *h2 | *ʕ | |
| *χ [10] | *χ | ḫ, ẖ, ħ | *H- | *h-, *-Ø- | *-H-? |
| *ʕ [10] | *ʕ | ꜥ | *H- | *ʕ-, *-Ø-ʔ | |
| *ħ [10] | *ħ | ħ | *H- | *ħ-, *-Øː- | |
| *h [10] | *h | j- | *h1, *h2 | *ʔ- | |
| *ʔ [10] | *ʔ | j, ? ꜣ | *ʔ | *ʔ, -Ø- | *ʔ |
| *r | *r | r, l, ꜣ | *r | -*r- | *r |
| *l | *l | n-, [l-], r, ꜣ | *l | -*l- | *l |
| *n | *n | n, l [11] | *n | -*n- | *n |
| *m | *m | m | *m | -*m- | *m |
| *w | *w | w-, j, y | *w, *Ø | *w, *Ø | *w-? |
| *y [j] | *y | j-, y-, -Ø- | *y, *i, *Ø | *y, *i, *Ø | *y, *Ø |
| Proto-Afroasiatic | Proto-Semitic | Egyptian | Berber | East Cushitic | West Chadic |
- under special conditions
NOTE:
- š = /ʃ/
- Symbols with dots underneath are emphatic consonants (variously glottalized, ejective or pharyngealized).
- Transcription of Ancient Egyptian follows Allen (2000); see Transliteration of Ancient Egyptian. The following are possible values for the non-IPA symbols used for Ancient Egyptian: ẖ = [ç]; ṯ = [tʲ] or [t͡ʃ]; ḏ = [dʲ] or [d͡ʒ], or ejective [tʲʼ] or [t͡ʃʼ].
Pronouns
Ehret (1995) reconstructs the following pronouns, most of which are supported by at least five of the six branches:
| Singular, bound | Singular, independent | Plural | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | *i, *yi | *(ʔ)ân-/(ʔ)în- | *(ʔ)ǎnn-/(ʔ)ǐnn- |
| 2 m. | *ku, *ka | *(ʔ)ânt/(ʔ)înt- | *kuuna |
| 2 f. | *ki | ||
| 3 | *si, *isi | *su, *usu | |
Numerals
Ehret (1995) reconstructs the following cardinal numbers (Ehret does not include Berber in his reconstruction):
| Number | Proto-Afroasiatic | Proto-Semitic | Egyptian | Proto-Cushitic | Proto-Chadic | Proto-Omotic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| two | *tsan, *can | *θny | snwj | |||
| *tsîr(n), *cîr(n) | *θər | *sər | ||||
| *ɬâm- | *ɬmʔl "left hand" | *ɬâ(a)m- | *lam- | |||
| three | *xaymz- | ḫmt.w | *knɗ- | *x2ayz- | ||
| four | *fâzw- | fdw | *fʷaɗə |
The first root for "two" has been compared to Berber (Tamazight) sin.[13] There are other proposed cognate sets:
Grammar
It has been proposed that Proto-Afroasiatic had marked nominative case marking, where the subject was overtly marked for nominative case, while the object appeared in unmarked default case. Marked nominative case marking is still found in languages of the Cushitic, Omotic and Berber branches. Its syntax possibly featured an exclusively default, strict word ordering of VSO. Although some Afroasiatic languages have developed free word order, it is generally surmised that PAA was originally a VO language.[14]
See also
- Nostratic languages
- Proto-Afroasiatic reconstructions (Wiktionary)
References
- Wichmann, Müller & Velupillai (2012), pp. 72-73.
- Nöth, Winfried (1 January 1994). Origins of Semiosis: Sign Evolution in Nature and Culture. Walter de Gruyter. p. 293. ISBN 978-3-11-087750-2. Retrieved 2013-08-13.
- Wichmann, Müller & Velupillai (2012), p. 73.
- Blažek, Václav. "Afro-Asiatic linguistic migrations: linguistic evidence" (PDF).
- Blench, Roger. (2006). Archaeology, Language, and the African Past. Rowman: Altamira. ISBN 9780759104662.
- Blench R (2006) Archaeology, Language, and the African Past, Rowman Altamira, ISBN 0-7591-0466-2, ISBN 978-0-7591-0466-2, https://books.google.com/books?id=esFy3Po57A8C
- Ehret, Christopher; Keita, S. O. Y.; Newman, Paul (2004). "The Origins of Afroasiatic". Science. 306 (5702): 1680.3–1680. doi:10.1126/science.306.5702.1680c. PMID 15576591. S2CID 8057990.
- Dolgopolsky (1999), pp. 38-39.
- Prasse (2000), p. 346.
- Takács (1999), pp. 263-270
- Takács (1999), p. 263
- Ehret (1995)
- Takács, Gábor (1999). Etymological Dictionary of Egyptian. Brill.
- Satzinger, Helmut (2018). "Did Proto-Afroasiatic have Marked Nominative or Nominative-Accusative Alignment?". In Tosco, Mauro (ed.). Afroasiatic: Data and perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 11–22. Open-access preprint version available.
Bibliography
- Bomhard, Allan R. (2008). "A Sketch of Proto-Afrasian Phonology", Ed. G. Takács, Semito-Hamitic Festschrift for A. B. Dolgopolsky and H. Jungraithmayr, Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag, pp. 79–92.
- Diakonoff, Igor M. (1988). Afrasian Languages. Moscow: Nauka.
- Dolgopolsky, Aharon (1998). The Nostratic Macrofamily and Linguistic Paleontology. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. ISBN 0-9519420-7-7.
- Dolgopolsky, Aron (1999). From Proto-Semitic to Hebrew. Milan: Centro Studi Camito-Semitici di Milano.
- Ehret, Christopher (1995). Reconstructing Proto-Afroasiatic (Proto-Afrasian): vowels, tone, consonants, and vocabulary. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-09799-8.
- Orel, Vladimir & Olga Stolbova (1995). Hamito-Semitic Etymological Dictionary. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill. ISBN 90-04-10051-2.
- Prasse, Karl G. (2000). Études berbères et chamito-sémitiques: mélanges offerts à Karl-G. Prasse.
- Takács, Gabór (1999). Etymological Dictionary of Egyptian. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill. ISBN 90-04-11538-2.
- Wichmann, Søren; Müller, André; Velupillai, Viveka (2012). "Homelands of the world's language families: A quantitative approach". In Søren Wichmann; Anthony P. Grant (eds.). Quantitative Approaches to Linguistic Diversity: Commemorating the centenary of the birth of Morris Swadesh. pp. 57–86. doi:10.1075/bct.46.05wic. ISBN 9789027202659.