Patterned vegetation

Patterned vegetation is a vegetation community that exhibits distinctive and repetitive patterns. Examples of patterned vegetation include fir waves, tiger bush, and string bog. The patterns typically arise from an interplay of phenomena that differentially encourage plant growth or mortality. A coherent pattern arises because there is a strong directional component to these phenomena, such as wind in the case of fir waves, or surface runoff in the case of tiger bush. The regular patterning of some types of vegetation is a striking feature of some landscapes. Patterns can include relatively evenly spaced patches, parallel bands or some intermediate between those two. These patterns in the vegetation can appear without any underlying pattern in soil types, and are thus said to “self-organize” rather than be determined by the environment. Several of the mechanisms underlying patterning of vegetation have been known and studied since at least the middle of the 20th century,[1] however, mathematical models replicating them have only been produced much more recently. Self-organization in spatial patterns is often a result of spatially uniform states becoming unstable through the monotonic growth and amplification of nonuniform perturbations.[2] A well known instability of this kind leads to so-called Turing patterns. These patterns occur at many scales of life, from cellular development (where they were first proposed) to pattern formation on animal pelts to sand dunes and patterned landscapes (see also pattern formation). In their simplest form models that capture Turing instabilities require two interactions at differing scales: local facilitation and more distant competition. For example, when Sato and Iwasa [3] produced a simple model of fir waves in the Japanese Alps, they assumed that trees exposed to cold winds would suffer mortality from frost damage, but upwind trees would protect nearby downwind trees from wind. Banding appears because the protective boundary layer created by the wind-most trees is eventually disrupted by turbulence, exposing more distant downwind trees to freezing damage once again.

False color aerial view of Tiger bush in Niger.
Aerial view of a Gapped bush plateau in the W National Park, Niger. Average distance between two successive gaps is 50 meters
View of fir waves in the United States.

When there is no directional resource flow across the landscape, spatial patterns may still appear in various regular and irregular forms along the rainfall gradient, including, in particular, hexagonal gap patterns at relatively high rainfall rates, stripe patterns at intermediate rates, and hexagonal spot patterns at low rates.[4] The presence of a clear directionality to some important factor (such as a freezing wind or surface flow down a slope) favors the formation of stripes (bands), oriented perpendicular to the flow direction, in wider ranges of rainfall rates. Several mathematical models have been published that reproduce a wide variety of patterned landscapes, including: semi-arid “tiger bush”,[5][6] hexagonal “fairy-circle” gap patterns,[7] woody-herbaceous landscapes,[8] salt marshes,[9] fog dependent desert vegetation,[10] mires and fens.[11] Although not strictly vegetation, sessile marine invertebrates such as mussels and oysters, have also been shown to form banding patterns.[12]

References
  1. Watt, A (1947). "Pattern and process in the plant community". Journal of Ecology. 35 (1/2): 1–22. doi:10.2307/2256497. JSTOR 2256497.
  2. Meron, E (2015). "Nonlinear Physics of Ecosystems". CRC Press.
  3. Satō K, Iwasa Y (1993). "Modeling of wave regeneration in subalpine Abies forests: population dynamics with spatial structure". Ecology. 74 (5): 1538–1554. doi:10.2307/1940081. JSTOR 1940081.
  4. Meron, E (2019). "Vegetation pattern formation: the mechanisms behind the forms". Physics Today. 72 (11): 30–36. Bibcode:2019PhT....72k..30M. doi:10.1063/PT.3.4340.
  5. Klausmeier, C (1999). "Regular and irregular patterns in semiarid vegetation". Science. 284 (5421): 1826–1828. doi:10.1126/science.284.5421.1826. PMID 10364553.
  6. Kéfi S, Eppinga MB, De Ruiter PC, Rietkerk M (2010). "Bistability and regular spatial patterns in arid ecosystems". Theoretical Ecology. 34 (4): 257–269. doi:10.1007/s12080-009-0067-z.
  7. Getzin S, Yizhaq H, Bell B, Erickson TE, Postle AC, Katra I, Tzuk O, Zelnik YR, Wiegand K, Wiegand T, Meron E (2016). "Discovery of fairy circles in Australia supports self-organization theory". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113 (13): 3551–3556. Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.3551G. doi:10.1073/pnas.1522130113. PMC 4822591. PMID 26976567.
  8. Gilad E, Shachak M, Meron E (2007). "Dynamics and spatial organization of plant communities in water-limited systems". Theoretical Population Biology. 72 (2): 214–230. doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2007.05.002. PMID 17628624.
  9. Rietkerk M, Van De Koppel J (2008). "Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 23 (3): 169–175. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.013. PMID 18255188.
  10. Borthagaray AI, Fuentes MA, Marquet PA (2010). "Vegetation pattern formation in a fog-dependent ecosystem". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 265 (1): 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.04.020. PMID 20417646.
  11. Eppinga M, Rietkerk M, Borren W, Lapshina E, Bleuten W, Wassen MJ (2008). "Regular Surface Patterning of Peatlands: Confronting Theory with Field Data". Ecosystems. 11 (4): 520–536. doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9138-z.
  12. Van De Koppel J, Gascoigne J, Theraulaz G, Rietkerk M, Mooij W, Herman P (2008). "Experimental Evidence for Spatial Self-Organization and Its Emergent Effects in Mussel Bed Ecosystems". Science. 322 (5902): 739–742. Bibcode:2008Sci...322..739V. doi:10.1126/science.1163952. PMID 18974353.

See also


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.