Macromolecular crowding

The phenomenon of macromolecular crowding alters the properties of molecules in a solution when high concentrations of macromolecules such as proteins are present.[2] Such conditions occur routinely in living cells; for instance, the cytosol of Escherichia coli contains about 300–400 mg/ml of macromolecules.[3] Crowding occurs since these high concentrations of macromolecules reduce the volume of solvent available for other molecules in the solution, which has the result of increasing their effective concentrations. Crowding can promote formation of a biomolecular condensate by colloidal phase separation.

Macromolecular crowding in the cytosol of cells alters the properties of macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids.[1]

This crowding effect can make molecules in cells behave in radically different ways than in test-tube assays.[4] Consequently, measurements of the properties of enzymes or processes in metabolism that are made in the laboratory (in vitro) in dilute solutions may be different by many orders of magnitude from the true values seen in living cells (in vivo). The study of biochemical processes under realistically crowded conditions is very important, since these conditions are a ubiquitous property of all cells and crowding may be essential for the efficient operation of metabolism. Indeed, in vitro studies showed that crowding greatly influences binding stability of proteins to DNA.[5]

Cause and effects

The interior of cells is a crowded environment. For example, an Escherichia coli cell is only about 2 micrometres (μm) long and 0.5 μm in diameter, with a cell volume of 0.6 - 0.7 μm3.[6] However, E. coli can contain up to 4,288 different types of proteins,[7] and about 1,000 of these types are produced at a high enough level to be easily detected.[8] Added to this mix are various forms of RNA and the cell's DNA chromosome, giving a total concentration of macromolecules of between 300 and 400 mg/ml.[3] In eukaryotes the cell's interior is further crowded by the protein filaments that make up the cytoskeleton, this meshwork divides the cytosol into a network of narrow pores.[9]

The volume of accessible solvent (red) for two molecules of widely different sizes (black circles) at high concentrations of macromolecules (grey circles). Reducing the available volume increases the effective concentration of macromolecules.

These high concentrations of macromolecules occupy a large proportion of the volume of the cell, which reduces the volume of solvent that is available for other macromolecules. This excluded volume effect increases the effective concentration of macromolecules (increasing their chemical activity), which in turn alters the rates and equilibrium constants of their reactions.[10] In particular this effect alters dissociation constants by favoring the association of macromolecules, such as when multiple proteins come together to form protein complexes, or when DNA-binding proteins bind to their targets in the genome.[11] Crowding may also affect enzyme reactions involving small molecules if the reaction involves a large change in the shape of the enzyme.[10]

The size of the crowding effect depends on both the molecular mass and shape of the molecule involved, although mass seems to be the major factor – with the effect being stronger with larger molecules.[10] Notably, the size of the effect is non-linear, so macromolecules are much more strongly affected than are small molecules such as amino acids or simple sugars. Macromolecular crowding is therefore an effect exerted by large molecules on the properties of other large molecules.

Importance

Macromolecular crowding is an important effect in biochemistry and cell biology. For example, the increase in the strength of interactions between proteins and DNA[5] produced by crowding may be of key importance in processes such as transcription and DNA replication.[12][13] Crowding has also been suggested to be involved in processes as diverse as the aggregation of hemoglobin in sickle-cell disease, and the responses of cells to changes in their volume.[4]

The importance of crowding in protein folding is of particular interest in biophysics. Here, the crowding effect can accelerate the folding process, since a compact folded protein will occupy less volume than an unfolded protein chain.[14] However, crowding can reduce the yield of correctly folded protein by increasing protein aggregation.[15][16] Crowding may also increase the effectiveness of chaperone proteins such as GroEL in the cell,[17] which could counteract this reduction in folding efficiency.[18] It has also been shown that macromolecular crowding affects protein-folding dynamics as well as overall protein shape where distinct conformational changes are accompanied by secondary structure alterations implying that crowding-induced shape changes may be important for protein function and malfunction in vivo.[19]

A particularly striking example of the importance of crowding effects involves the crystallins that fill the interior of the lens. These proteins have to remain stable and in solution for the lens to be transparent; precipitation or aggregation of crystallins causes cataracts.[20] Crystallins are present in the lens at extremely high concentrations, over 500 mg/ml, and at these levels crowding effects are very strong. The large crowding effect adds to the thermal stability of the crystallins, increasing their resistance to denaturation.[21] This effect may partly explain the extraordinary resistance shown by the lens to damage caused by high temperatures.[22]

Study

Due to macromolecular crowding, enzyme assays and biophysical measurements performed in dilute solution may fail to reflect the actual process and its kinetics taking place in the cytosol.[23] One approach to produce more accurate measurements would be to use highly concentrated extracts of cells, to try to maintain the cell contents in a more natural state. However, such extracts contain many kinds of biologically active molecules, which can interfere with the phenomena being studied.[2] Consequently, crowding effects are mimicked in vitro by adding high concentrations of relatively inert molecules such as polyethylene glycol, ficoll, dextran, or serum albumin to experimental media.[5][24] However, using such artificial crowding agents can be complicated, as these crowding molecules can sometimes interact in other ways with the process being examined, such as by binding weakly to one of the components.[2]

Macromolecular crowding and protein folding

A major importance of macromolecular crowding to biological systems stems from its effect on protein folding. The underlying physical mechanism by which macromolecular crowding helps to stabilize proteins in their folded state is often explained in terms of excluded volume - the volume inaccessible to the proteins due to their interaction with macromolecular crowders.[25][26] This notion goes back to Asakura and Oosawa, who have described depletion forces induced by steric, hard-core, interactions.[27][28] A hallmark of the mechanism inferred from the above is that the effect is completely a-thermal, and thus completely entropic. These ideas were also proposed to explain why small cosolutes, namely protective osmolytes, which are preferentially excluded from proteins, also shift the protein folding equilibrium towards the folded state.[29] However, it has been shown by various methods, both experimental[30][31][32] and theoretical,[33][34][35] that depletion forces are not always entropic in nature.

Macromolecular crowding in regenerative medicine

Satyam et al. from National University of Ireland, Galway (NUI Galway) proposed macromolecular crowding as means to create ECM-rich tissue equivalents. The principle of macromolecular crowding is derived from the notion that in vivo cells reside in a highly crowded/dense extracellular space and therefore the conversion of the de novo synthesised procollagen to collagen I is rapid. However, in the even substantially more dilute than body fluids (e.g., urine: 36–50 g/L; blood: 80 g/L) culture conditions (e.g., HAM F10 nutrient medium: 16.55 g/L; DMEM/ F12 medium: 16.78 g/L; DMEM high glucose and L-glutamine medium: 17.22 g/L), the rate limiting conversion of procollagen to collagen I is very slow. It was confirmed that the addition of inert polydispersed macromolecules (presented as spherical objects of variable diameter) in the culture media will facilitate amplified production of ECM-rich living substitutes. Macromolecular crowding, by imitating native tissue localised density, can be utilised to effectively modulate in vitro microenvironments and ultimately produce ECM-rich cell substitutes, within hours rather than days or months in culture, without compromising fundamental cellular functions.[36][37][38][39]

See also

References
  1. Goodsell DS (1991). "Inside a living cell". Trends Biochem. Sci. 16 (6): 203–6. doi:10.1016/0968-0004(91)90083-8. PMID 1891800.
  2. Ellis RJ (October 2001). "Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated". Trends Biochem. Sci. 26 (10): 597–604. doi:10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01938-7. PMID 11590012.
  3. Zimmerman SB, Trach SO (December 1991). "Estimation of macromolecule concentrations and excluded volume effects for the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli". J. Mol. Biol. 222 (3): 599–620. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90499-V. PMID 1748995.
  4. Minton AP (July 2006). "How can biochemical reactions within cells differ from those in test tubes?". J. Cell Sci. 119 (Pt 14): 2863–9. doi:10.1242/jcs.03063. PMID 16825427.
  5. Ganji, Mahipal; Docter, Margreet; Le Grice, Stuart F. J.; Abbondanzieri, Elio A. (2016-09-30). "DNA binding proteins explore multiple local configurations during docking via rapid rebinding". Nucleic Acids Research. 44 (17): 8376–8384. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw666. ISSN 0305-1048. PMC 5041478. PMID 27471033.
  6. Kubitschek HE (1 January 1990). "Cell volume increase in Escherichia coli after shifts to richer media". J. Bacteriol. 172 (1): 94–101. doi:10.1128/jb.172.1.94-101.1990. PMC 208405. PMID 2403552.
  7. Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch CA, et al. (September 1997). "The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12". Science. 277 (5331): 1453–74. doi:10.1126/science.277.5331.1453. PMID 9278503.
  8. Han MJ, Lee SY (June 2006). "The Escherichia coli proteome: past, present, and future prospects". Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70 (2): 362–439. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00036-05. PMC 1489533. PMID 16760308.
  9. Minton AP (October 1992). "Confinement as a determinant of macromolecular structure and reactivity". Biophys. J. 63 (4): 1090–100. Bibcode:1992BpJ....63.1090M. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81663-6. PMC 1262248. PMID 1420928. Archived from the original on 2008-09-07.
  10. Minton AP (2001). "The influence of macromolecular crowding and macromolecular confinement on biochemical reactions in physiological media". J. Biol. Chem. 276 (14): 10577–80. doi:10.1074/jbc.R100005200. PMID 11279227.
  11. Zhou HX, Rivas G, Minton AP (2008). "Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences". Annu Rev Biophys. 37 (1): 375–97. doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817. PMC 2826134. PMID 18573087.
  12. Zimmerman SB (November 1993). "Macromolecular crowding effects on macromolecular interactions: some implications for genome structure and function". Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1216 (2): 175–85. doi:10.1016/0167-4781(93)90142-Z. PMID 8241257.
  13. Zimmerman SB, Harrison B (April 1987). "Macromolecular crowding increases binding of DNA polymerase to DNA: an adaptive effect". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84 (7): 1871–5. Bibcode:1987PNAS...84.1871Z. doi:10.1073/pnas.84.7.1871. PMC 304543. PMID 3550799.
  14. van den Berg B, Wain R, Dobson CM, Ellis RJ (August 2000). "Macromolecular crowding perturbs protein refolding kinetics: implications for folding inside the cell". EMBO J. 19 (15): 3870–5. doi:10.1093/emboj/19.15.3870. PMC 306593. PMID 10921869.
  15. van den Berg B, Ellis RJ, Dobson CM (December 1999). "Effects of macromolecular crowding on protein folding and aggregation". EMBO J. 18 (24): 6927–33. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.24.6927. PMC 1171756. PMID 10601015.
  16. Ellis RJ, Minton AP (May 2006). "Protein aggregation in crowded environments". Biol. Chem. 387 (5): 485–97. doi:10.1515/BC.2006.064. PMID 16740119. S2CID 7336464.
  17. Martin J, Hartl FU (February 1997). "The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 (4): 1107–12. Bibcode:1997PNAS...94.1107M. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.4.1107. PMC 19752. PMID 9037014.
  18. Ellis RJ (2007). Protein misassembly: macromolecular crowding and molecular chaperones. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 594. pp. 1–13. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-39975-1_1. ISBN 978-0-387-39974-4. PMID 17205670.
  19. Dirar Homouz; Michael Perham; Antonios Samiotakis; Margaret S. Cheung & Pernilla Wittung-Stafshede (2008). "Crowded, cell-like environment induces shape changes in aspherical protein". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (33): 11754–11759. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10511754H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803672105. PMC 2515223. PMID 18697933.
  20. Benedek GB (1 September 1997). "Cataract as a protein condensation disease: the Proctor Lecture". Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38 (10): 1911–21. PMID 9331254.
  21. Steadman BL, Trautman PA, Lawson EQ, et al. (December 1989). "A differential scanning calorimetric study of the bovine lens crystallins". Biochemistry. 28 (25): 9653–8. doi:10.1021/bi00451a017. PMID 2611254.
  22. Bloemendal H, de Jong W, Jaenicke R, Lubsen NH, Slingsby C, Tardieu A (November 2004). "Ageing and vision: structure, stability and function of lens crystallins". Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 86 (3): 407–85. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2003.11.012. PMID 15302206.
  23. Norris MG, Malys N (2011). "What is the true enzyme kinetics in the biological system? An investigation of macromolecular crowding effect upon enzyme kinetics of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase". Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 405 (3): 388–92. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.01.037. PMID 21237136.
  24. Tokuriki N, Kinjo M, Negi S, et al. (January 2004). "Protein folding by the effects of macromolecular crowding". Protein Sci. 13 (1): 125–33. doi:10.1110/ps.03288104. PMC 2286514. PMID 14691228.
  25. Minton, A. (1981). "Excluded Volume as a Determinant of Macromolecular Structure and Reactivity". Biopolymers. 20 (10): 2093–2120. doi:10.1002/bip.1981.360201006. S2CID 97753189.
  26. Parsegian, VA. (2002). Protein-water interactions. Int. Rev. Cytol. International Review of Cytology. 215. pp. 1–31. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(02)15003-0. ISBN 9780123646194. PMID 11952225.
  27. Asakura, Sho; Oosawa, F (1 January 1954). "On Interaction between Two Bodies Immersed in a Solution of Macromolecules". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 22 (7): 1255. Bibcode:1954JChPh..22.1255A. doi:10.1063/1.1740347.
  28. Asakura, Sho; Oosawa, F. (1958). "Interaction between Particles Suspended in Solutions of Macromolecules". Journal of Polymer Science. 33 (126): 183–192. Bibcode:1958JPoSc..33..183A. doi:10.1002/pol.1958.1203312618.
  29. Stagg, Loren; Zhang, Shao-Qing; Cheung, Margaret S.; Wittung-Stafshede, Pernilla (2007-11-27). "Molecular crowding enhances native structure and stability of α/β protein flavodoxin". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (48): 18976–18981. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10418976S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705127104. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2141893. PMID 18024596.
  30. Politi, R; Harries, D. (2010). "Enthalpically Driven Peptide Stabilization by Protective Osmolytes". Chem. Commun. 46 (35): 6449–6451. doi:10.1039/c0cc01763a. PMID 20657920.
  31. Benton, L.A.; Smith, A.E.; Young, G.B.; Pielak, G.J. (2012). "Unexpected Effects of Macromolecular Crowding on Protein Stability". Biochemistry. 51 (49): 9773–9775. doi:10.1021/bi300909q. PMID 23167542.
  32. Sukenik, S; Sapir, L.; Harries, D. (2013). "Balance of enthalpy and entropy in depletion forces". Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 18 (6): 495–501. arXiv:1310.2100. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2013.10.002. S2CID 18847346.
  33. Sapir, L; Harries, D. (2014). "Origin of Enthalpic Depletion Forces". J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 (7): 1061–1065. doi:10.1021/jz5002715. PMID 26274449.
  34. Sapir, L; Harries, D. (2015). "Is the depletion force entropic? Molecular crowding beyond steric interactions". Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 20: 3–10. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2014.12.003.
  35. Sapir, L; Harries, D. (2015). "Macromolecular Stabilization by Excluded Cosolutes: Mean Field Theory of Crowded Solutions". J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 (7): 3478–3490. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00258. PMID 26575781.
  36. Satyam, Abhigyan; Kumar, Pramod; Fan, Xingliang; Gorelov, Alexander; Rochev, Yury; Joshi, Lokesh; Peinado, Héctor; Lyden, David; Thomas, Benjamin (2014-05-21). "Macromolecular crowding meets tissue engineering by self-assembly: a paradigm shift in regenerative medicine". Advanced Materials. 26 (19): 3024–3034. doi:10.1002/adma.201304428. hdl:10379/15414. ISSN 1521-4095. PMID 24505025.
  37. Kumar, Pramod; Satyam, Abhigyan; Fan, Xingliang; Collin, Estelle; Rochev, Yury; Rodriguez, Brian J.; Gorelov, Alexander; Dillon, Simon; Joshi, Lokesh (2015-03-04). "Macromolecularly crowded in vitro microenvironments accelerate the production of extracellular matrix-rich supramolecular assemblies". Scientific Reports. 5: 8729. Bibcode:2015NatSR...5E8729K. doi:10.1038/srep08729. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 4348624. PMID 25736020.
  38. Satyam, Abhigyan; Kumar, Pramod; Cigognini, Daniela; Pandit, Abhay; Zeugolis, Dimitrios I. (2016-10-15). "Low, but not too low, oxygen tension and macromolecular crowding accelerate extracellular matrix deposition in human dermal fibroblast culture". Acta Biomaterialia. 44: 221–231. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.008. ISSN 1878-7568. PMID 27506127.
  39. , Zeugolis, Dimitrios & Abhigyan Satyam, "Engineered living tissue substitute"
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.