Keith Meinhold

Keith Meinhold (born c. 1963) is a veteran of the US Navy who successfully challenged the Navy's attempt to discharge him for coming out as gay in 1992 and ended his Navy career in 1996, one of the first openly gay U.S. service members to be honorably discharged.

Keith Meinhold
Born1963 (1963) (age 58)
Known forOne of the first openly gay United States Navy service members to be honorably discharged

Early career

Volker Keith Meinhold grew up in Stuart, Florida. On April 10, 1980, at the age of 17, rather than repeat the 11th grade at Martin County High School,[1] he enlisted in the U.S. Navy.[2] He realized he was gay after enlisting[3] and came out to his family in 1990 at Christmas.[1]

During his first decade of service in the Navy, Meinhold received merit promotions and was commended in his performance evaluations for "outstanding job performance," "positive influence on squadron morale," and "excellent rapport with both seniors and his peers." He left the Navy in July 1985 and re-enlisted in October 1985. He worked as a flight sonar analyst and instructor at Moffett Field Naval Air Station, near San Jose, California, where, according to later court filings, he was "consistently praised by students for his teaching abilities."[4] Meinhold flew missions throughout the Pacific and Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf.

He supervised a team of 32 Navy instructors and was recognized as "Aircrew Instructor of the Year".[5] In September 1991, he was awarded the title "Master Training Specialist", an honor granted to those rated in the top ten percent of all Navy instructors.[4]

Meinhold worked with a group that helped gays being discharged from the Navy find employment. They were overwhelmed by anti-homosexual campaigns–he called them "witch hunts"–on certain ships, the USS Blue Ridge (LCC-19) and USS Independence (CV-62). He contacted the Human Rights Campaign about the problem and they arranged for him to speak with the media about the witch hunts and about being gay in the Navy.[3] On May 19, 1992, he declared his homosexuality in an interview on the ABC News program World News Tonight when he told a television interviewer: "Yes, in fact, I am gay."[6][7]

Discharge proceedings

On the basis of that statement, the Navy convened a discharge board to consider his case. Several officers testified on his behalf and one apologized for any inadvertent prejudice and said he had changed his opinion about homosexuals as a result of knowing Meinhold. The Navy decided to discharge Meinhold on June 30, and he was separated from the Navy on August 12, 1992.[7]

Meinhold sued in federal court contending that his discharge had violated the Constitution's equal protection guarantee and that the Navy board had acted unfairly by refusing to tell him at his discharge hearing whether he was being judged for acknowledging his homosexuality or for engaging in homosexual acts, something he consistently denied. On November 7, 1992, U.S. District Court Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. issued a temporary injunction against the Navy and ordered Meinhold reinstated.[8]

Meinhold returned to work, where many of his colleagues had known he was gay before his television appearance. He told reporters that "Some people have asked to be excused from performing military duties because of religious objections–that homosexuality is wrong." Their commander officers excused them from working alongside him. "I think that was wrong," Meinhold said.[6]

On November 12, President-elect Bill Clinton, in response to a reporter's question at his first post-election press conference about the injunction in Meinhold's case, reaffirmed his commitment to lift restrictions on military service by gays and lesbians early in his presidency.[9][10]

Hatter made the injunction permanent when he issued his decision in the case on January 28, 1993. He wrote that Meinhold's discharge violated the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection and that a discharge was unjustifiable "in the absence of sexual conduct which interferes with the military mission." He wrote: "Gays and lesbians have served, and continue to serve, the United States military with honor, pride, dignity and loyalty. The Department of Defense's justifications for its policy banning gays and lesbians from military service are based on cultural myths and false stereotypes. These justifications are baseless and very similar to the reasons offered to keep the military racially segregated in the 1940s." Hatter cited a study commissioned by the Defense Department in 1988 that found that sexual orientation was not related to job performance and quoted Lawrence J. Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Reagan administration, who had said "there is no longer any justification for the armed services' current ban on homosexuals serving in the military."[11]

On January 29, Clinton reached an agreement with Senate leaders, led by Sen. Sam Nunn, chairman of the Senate Armed Forces Committee, to delay until July any changes in policies with respect to military service by gays and lesbians. At a joint news conference with Nunn, Clinton praised Judge Hatter's ruling, which he said had strengthened his hand in the negotiations: "It makes the practical point I have been making all along."[12] Meinhold appeared on the February 1 cover of Newsweek that carried the headline "Gays and the Military".[13]

Meinhold assessed his work environment following Hatter's decision: "Some people are openly supportive, others give closet support and others, by their vibes alone, are not happy with my return".[14]

On March 12, 1993, lawyers for the Department of Defense failed to get an emergency stay of Hatter's order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The court noted that Clinton had issued a directive on January 29 that precluded discharges for homosexuality and directed instead that homosexual military personnel be transferred to standby reserve, which did not conflict with Hatter's injunction.[15]

As part of the appeals process, Capt. Gregory Markwell, Meinhold's commander, provided in a sworn statement his negative assessment of the impact Meinhold's presence was having. As the national debate about modifying the rules banning gays and lesbians from the Armed Forces continued, Navy officials opposed to changing the policy made legislators aware of Markwell's statement and two Congressional committees requested it and made it public. Markwell's declaration described how work schedules were being modified to accommodate those who did not want to work with Meinhold and said that his reinstatement had "reduced morale, efficiency and mission focus" and "struck a discordant note with the troops."[16][17]

In the weeks that followed, Meinhold testified before the House Armed Services Committee[18] and then the Senate Armed Services Committee.[19]

On August 31, 1994, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled unanimously that the Navy could not discharge Petty Officer Meinhold merely because he said he is gay. The court wrote: "a military service cannot discharge a service member solely because of a statement of sexual orientation devoid of a concrete, expressed desire to act on his homosexual propensity", distinguishing between declaration of sex orientation and the military's judgment of "conduct". It noted that "No similar assumption is made with respect to service members who are heterosexual" unless they are guilty of such prohibited conduct as adultery, sodomy or bigamy. Meinhold's lawyers saw this analysis as a direct attack on the assumptions behind the proposed "Don't ask, don't tell" (DADT) policy, then under consideration. One commented: "This decision says it is improper for the Government to make a presumption that a person who says he or she is gay will conduct himself or herself in prohibited conduct. That presumption is the linchpin for the Clinton Administration policy."[20] The court read the Navy's regulation "to mandate separation due to a statement of homosexuality only when that statement itself indicates more than the inchoate 'desire' or 'propensity' that inheres in status", not when a statement "manifests no concrete, expressed desire to commit homosexual acts".[7]

The Department of Defense did not appeal the decision,[21] since it related to old regulations that had now been replaced by DADT, and the administration had won a different case, that of Joseph Steffan, a week earlier. Meinhold, now working at Naval Airborne Station at Whidbey Island in Washington, was warned that under DADT, if he repeated the same statement that had prompted the Navy's discharge proceedings, he would be discharged. His attorney commented: "He was told by the executive officer of his squadron that he has a clean slate, and that he would be permitted to remain, but that if he says he's gay again, then they would be taking action against him under the new policy. It's ridiculous. They live with a known homosexual so long as he doesn't show how gay he is. It shows how symbolic the policy really is."[22]

Later career

In July 1995, Hatter ordered the government to pay Meinhold $440,000 in court costs.[23] The government appealed and the Ninth circuit again found for Meinhold, on February 4, 1997.[7]

In his final Navy tour, Meinhold was recognized for photographic intelligence quality with two Lens Master and one Golden Lens awards. His crew was honored as the most combat effective P-3 crew in the Pacific Fleet as both the "Crew of the Quarter" and "Crew of the Year". Meinhold left active duty after 16 years of service in March 1996 and was awarded the Navy Achievement Medal.[5][24]

In 1999, asked if he blamed DADT for the murder of Pfc. Barry Winchell by a fellow soldier, Meinhold told CBS News: "Absolutely. Not just the policy, but the lack of proper implementation of the policy is responsible for his death. I think what has happened out of the policy is that the Pentagon has perpetuated this anti-gay sentiment and hasn't done anything to prevent this."[25]

He lives in Florida with his partner Steven Weiss. He works in marketing and graphic design for a hedge fund based in Coconut Grove.[3]

See also
  • Sexual orientation and the United States military

References
  1. Orlando Sentinel: "Mother Backs Son's Challenge On Military's Ban Against Gays," November 29, 1992, accessed March 20, 2012
  2. Gross, Jane (13 November 1992). "Gay Sailor, Blazing Path for Others, Returns to Base After Court Order". New York Times. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
  3. Miami Herald: Steve Rothaus, "Gay sailor Keith Meinhold, who fought for his career, is still vigilant about 'don't ask, don't tell'," March 2010, accessed March 20, 2012
  4. Stanford Law School: Meinhold v. Department of Defense, January 25, 1993, accessed March 20, 2012
  5. Palm Center: Rhonda Evans, "U.S. Military Policies Concerning Homosexuals: Development, Implementation and Outcomes", accessed March 20, 2012
  6. New York Times: "Reinstated Gay Sailor Revels in Navy Routine," November 2, 1992, accessed March 20, 2012
  7. FindLaw: Meinhold v. Department of Defense, August 28, 1997, accessed March 20, 2012
  8. New York Times: Jane Gross, "Judge Orders Gay Sailor Temporarily Reinstated," November 8, 1992, accessed March 20, 2012
  9. George Stephanopoulos, All Too Human: A Political Education (Little, Brown, 1999), available online, accessed March 20, 2012
  10. Barney Frank, Barney Frank: The Story of America's Only Left-handed, Gay, Jewish Congressman (University of Massachusetts Press, 2009), 398, available online, accessed March 20, 2012
  11. New York Times: Robert Reinhold, "Homosexual Ban Loses in U.S. Court," January 29, 1993, accessed March 20, 2012
  12. New York Times: "Excerpts From the News Conferences by Clinton and Nunn," January 30, 1993, accessed March 20, 2012
  13. Ron Becker, Gay TV and Straight America (Rutgers University Press, 2006), 63
  14. New York Times: Jane Gross, "Uneasy Silence at Base Where Gay Sailor Serves," January 30, 1993, accessed March 20, 2012
  15. New York Times: "U.S. Fails to Get Stay in Case of Gay Sailor," March 13, 1993, accessed March 20, 2012
  16. New York Times: Eric Schmitt, "Months After Order on Gay Ban, Military Is Still Resisting Clinton," March 23, 1993, accessed March 20, 2012
  17. Deseret News: "Reinstatement of Gay Sailor has Ruined Morale, Navy Says," March 22, 1993, accessed March 20, 2012
  18. Baltimore Sun: "Joint Chiefs' exclusion from hearing on gays angers some," March 28, 1993, accessed March 20, 2012
  19. David Mixner, Stranger among Friends (Bantam Books, 1996), 319. Allan Bérubé mistakenly refers to Meinhold as one of several "former gay service members" who testified. Allan Bérubé, My Desire for History: Essays in Gay, Community, and Labor History (University of North Carolina Press, 2011), 228n13
  20. New York Times: Jane Gross, "Navy Cannot Discharge Gay Officer, Court Rules," September 1, 1994, accessed March 20, 2012
  21. New York Times: David Johnston, "Gay Sailor Claims a Victory As Court Case Deadline Passes," October 17, 1994, accessed March 20, 2012
  22. New York Times: Stephen Labaton, "U.S. Drops Effort to Oust a Gay Sailors," November 29, 1994, accessed March 20, 2012
  23. New York Times: "U.S. Told to Pay Legal Bills of Gay Sailor," July 20, 1995, accessed March 20, 2012
  24. Congressional Record: Gerry E. Studds, "Extensions of Remarks, " March 27, 1996, accessed March 20, 2012
  25. CBS News: "Military's Gay Policy On Trial," 2009, accessed March 202, 2012
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.