Ioniță Cuza

Ion Cuza or Cuzea, commonly known as Ioniță Cuza (ca. 1715 – August 18, 1778), was a Moldavian statesman and political conspirator, remembered as one of the first Romanian nationalists and Freemasons. His paternal family, the Cuzas (Cuzeas), were landowners of uncertain origin who, by the time of Ioniță's birth, had been established into the boyardom, being under the patronage of Doukas and Sturdza aristocrats. Ioniță's mother was a direct descendant of the statesman-chronicler Miron Costin; his father, Miron Cuza, had been involved in the pro-Habsburg conspiracy headed by François Ernaut, while his grandfather, Dumitrașco Cuzea, had been hanged during the clampdown. As boyars, both the Cuzas and the Costins opposed the Phanariote regime and devised other schemes to emancipate Moldavia from the Ottoman Empire.

Ioniță (Ioan) Cuza
Cuza family coat of arms, Emanuel Hagi-Mosco version
Stolnic of Moldavia
In office 1759–1763
Paharnic of Moldavia
In office 1769–1773
Personal details
Born	ca. 1715
Died	August 18, 1778 Iași, Moldavia
Spouse(s)	Tudosica Râșcanu
Relations	Dumitrașco Cuza (grandfather) Ioniță Costin (grandfather) Miron Cuza (father) Toader Râșcanu (father-in-law)
Children	Nicolae Cuza Arghirie Cuza Gheorghe I Cuza Constantin Cuza
Military service
Allegiance	Moldavia
Years of service	1774–1778
Rank	Spatharios
Commands	Moldavian military forces

Ioniță was at the forefront of this fight in 1759, when he managed to contain the actions of Prince Ioan Teodor Callimachi and his courtier Iordaki Stavraki, expelling the latter from Moldavia. He was propelled to high office, serving for years as the Moldavian Stolnic. In 1767, Cuza also had a standoff with Grigore III Ghica, who finally agreed to grant him and other native boyars access to higher offices, and thus earned Cuza's enduring political support. He was Paharnic before and during the Russo-Turkish War of 1768, returning as Spatharios, or commander of the Moldavian military forces, during Ghica's second and final reign. While conserving his standing in regional politics, Cuza built a large estate of his own, with clusters of villages in both Fălciu County and Bessarabia.

Cuza was finally executed, with Manolache Bogdan, after both were caught up in the intrigues against Prince Constantine Mourouzis. He was survived by five sons. Through one of them, Ioniță was the great-grandfather of Alexandru Ioan Cuza, Romanian nationalist campaigner and Domnitor of the United Principalities. His reign saw several rapprochements between the Cuzas and the Mourouzis, all of which created controversy and returned focus on Ioniță's rebellion. Another one of Ioniță's sons was the great-grandfather of A. C. Cuza, the antisemitic doctrinaire.

Biography

Origins

Ioniță Cuza's ethnic origins and ancestry are largely uncertain, subject to several competing theories. Some early hypotheses, centered on the name's resonance, have proposed that the Cuzas were Italians or Lorrainers.[1] Historian N. Stoicescu believes that they were possibly ethnic Greeks.[2] According to genealogist Ștefan S. Gorovei, Ioniță's ancestry is entirely local and can be traced back to January 1588, with the first mention of a "Cozea" from Roșiori. This figure, identified by Gorovei as the Cuza patriarch, made lucrative land deals in other parts of Neamț County, leaving a fortune to his sons. One of these may be Toader Cuza, who is shown to be engaged in commercial exchanges with the boyar Toader Jora.[3] Another genealogist, Gheorghe G. Bezviconi, proposes that the Joras and the Cuzas had a common ancestor, the Vornic Băisan.[4] The family may have branched out into Bessarabia at an early stage, with records showing them as founders and owners of the village Cozești.[5] Unusually among Moldavian boyars, the Cuzas seem not to have adopted a coat of arms of their own,[6] although a tierced per fess shield is attributed to them in Emanuel Hagi-Mosco's album.[7]

The first Cuza to reach high office may have been a Vistier Coza, serving in the 1630s. According to Stoicescu, he was father of the better-known Dumitrașco Cuza (or Cuzea).[8] Contrarily, Gorovei argues that there is "no certain connection" between the Vistier and Dumitrașco, who was the known heir of Toader Cuza.[9] It is also known that Dumitrașco married Safta, daughter of Toader Jora and sister-in-law of the Great Vornic Ioan Sturza (of the Greek Sturdzas).[10] One period writ describes him as the son of Safta Jora.[11] This dynastic arrangement also made Cuza a relative of the powerful Doukas and brought him a large dowry, including 15 estates in Moldavia-proper and Bessarabia.[12] He had a steady climb at the court, being first mentioned in June 1677 as Comis for Prince Antonie Ruset, granted ownership of Vlăicenii village in recognition for his service.[13] He became Spatharios in 1679, under George Ducas, returning as Great Stolnic and Great Spatharios under Constantine Ducas.[14]

Dumitrașco also cultivated a close relationship with the Costin boyars, and in particular with Hetman Ioniță Costin, orphaned son of the writer and politician Miron Costin. Cuza's own three sons, Miron, Toader and Velicico, were involved in cementing such links. Miron Cuza (fl. 1680–1742)[15] may have been named after Ioniță's father.[16] Holding office as Logothete, he married Ilinca, daughter of Ioniță Costin, granddaughter of his namesake and niece of Nicolae Costin.[17] The Costins had been one of the most powerful players after the Moldavian Magnate Wars, keeping Princes as the "instruments of [their] party".[18] Through her mother Ileana, Ilinca also descended from Movilești royalty.[19]

In 1701–1702, Cuza Sr and the Hetman tried to mediate a conflict between Prince Ducas and his Spatharios, Mihai Racoviță.[20] Instead, they came to be detested by the latter. Cuza was sidelined later that year, when Racoviță managed to topple and replace Ducas.[21] Over the following decades, Phanariote bureaucrats acting under the supervision of the Ottoman Empire instituted a regime which cut back on the privileges of established boyar families. Racoviță participated in its creation, returning to rule as a Phanariote in December 1715. However, in 1716, Moldavia was dragged into the Austro–Turkish War. Racoviță and his Seimeni "put up no resistance" to the Imperial Army, which then imposed terror on the city of Iași.[22]

Following this regime change, Miron and Velicico involved themselves in a plot to topple Racoviță, alongside boyar Vasile Ceaurul and the mercenary François "Franță" Ernaut.[23] In January 1717, the Seimeni defeated Ernaut, and resumed control of the country. Racoviță ordered Cuza Sr's hanging,[24] in what was seen by chronicler Ion Neculce as a blind retaliation for his sons' doings.[25] His body was dropped in a mass grave by the side of Cetățuia Monastery.[26] The three younger Cuzas escaped vengeance, but were kept out of political affairs; Toader's sons declined socially, losing their boyar status.[27]

Rise

The son of Miron and Ilinca, Ioniță was born at an unknown date, referred to by historians as "before 1720"[28] or "around 1715".[29] He is known to have had a brother, Mihalache, who is recorded as deceased before 1760.[30] His grandfather Costin died late in 1729, leaving Miron an heir to much of his estate.[31] In 1742–1748, Ioniță was a Postelnic, and then a Pitar to 1752,[32] being consulted by Prince Constantine Mavrocordatos during the abolition of Moldavian serfdom (April 1749). The same year, he and other boyars sent three letters of protest to Abdullah Pasha, the Ottoman Grand Vizier, demanding less taxation and fewer privileges for the foreign merchants.[33] According to Gorovei, these letters should be seen as early documents of Romanian nationalism, with Ioniță Cuza included on "something one may call the 'national party', or the homegrown party".[34]

The Pitar's anti-Phanariote sentiments were recorded under the reign of Ioan Teodor Callimachi, whose Spatharios, Iordaki Stavraki, blacklisted Cuza.[35] In 1759, the same Stavraki devised a plan to have Cuza and other 11 boyars removed, sending them on diplomatic mission to the Crimean Khanate, where they were to be kidnapped. The plan was uncovered and the boyars rebelled: as noted by Cuza himself, they had support "from the whole country", obtaining Stavraki's removal and exile; Cuza then reconciled with the Prince, taking over as Stolnic.[36] He was simultaneously Stolnic and Vistier to 1763, also serving as the Ispravnic of Vaslui from 1761 to 1767.[37]

As the head of his house, Ioniță was ktitor of the Moldavian Orthodox church in Negrești. Recognized for his philanthropy, in 1762 he received from the widow Safta Racleș the neighboring village of Bârzești.[38] After 1770, Cuza also became implicated in more controversial credit ventures, earning the reputation of a usurer.[39] The deeds he held in Negrești and Bârzești became the basis for a large Cuza domain, which also included Zăpodeni and Rebricea; he had inherited additional land in Cuzlău, as well as townhouses in Vaslui and Iași.[40] Cuza married a daughter of Pitar Toader Râșcanu, Tudosica, with whom he had five sons.[41] Of these, four are known to have survived into maturity: Nicolae (or Neculai), Arghirie, Gheorghe and Constantin.[42] All were educated at home, by tutors from Golia Monastery.[43]

By 1767, Cuza was again in conflict with the Phanariote regime, which at the time was personified by prince Grigore III Ghica. He and other boyars declared themselves outraged at being sidelined from major offices, and left the country on voluntary exile. The Ottoman envoy, or Kapucu, intervened as mediator; the protesters returned after being promised reparations.[44] Thus, Cuza himself returned to prominence. From 1769 to 1773, he served as Paharnic,[45] ending his term under the early stages of a Russian occupation. The latter period saw Cuza working with other boyars to limit Phanariote abuses by resorting to Russian and Ottoman arbitration under the terms of Küçük Kaynarca. In August 1774, the boyars, gathered at Focșani, nominated Cuza and Enachi Chirica as their envoys to Istanbul, where they were to ask for Ghica's return as Prince. Sultan Abdul Hamid I confirmed Ghica for the throne before they left, rendering their mission redundant.[46]

Rebellion and execution

The citadel of Iași, as imagined in 1686 by Gabriel Bodenehr

Cuza was appointed as Ghica's Spatharios later in 1774.[47] The reign was nevertheless one of major setbacks, beginning with the forced cession of northern Moldavia, annexed by the Habsburg Monarchy and administered as part of Galicia–Lodomeria. The Prince was assassinated in 1777,[48] with Constantine Mourouzis taking his throne. Cuza preserved his rank and office, but began conspiring against the new monarch. Various foreign sources indicate that the project was of a Masonic inspiration, which would push the history of Freemasonry in Romania to 1770 or even before, to 1740.[49] According to Gorovei, Cuza's scheme involved deposing Mourouzis and placing Vornic Manolache Bogdan on the throne.[50] Another historian, Nicolae Iorga, attributes the initiative to a low-ranking boyar, Iordachi Dărmănescu, Cuza and other boyars being only drawn in by their "politicking".[51] Various other researches have also noted that Dărmănescu was a key figure in the import of Enlightenment philosophy and modernizing political literature to Moldavia.[52]

Mourouzis was informed of the Bogdan–Cuza–Dărmănescu conspiracy, and retaliated: Bogdan and Cuza were apprehended and interrogated under torture by another Spatharios, Constantin Caragea. Exposed to a similar treatment, Dărmănescu admitted to having sent a letter to the Ottoman authorities in Bender, asking for arbitration against Mourouzis. He also incriminated Cuza, who was one of the boyars to have signed that document.[53] Historian A. D. Xenopol notes that Cuza was mainly targeted not for actually siding with Bogdan, but for having protested against the Ottoman army's raids in Moldavia. Prince Mourouzis had also found the Ottoman presence unpalatable, but, Xenopol writes, regarded Cuza's additional complaints as dangerously excessive.[54]

Cuza and Bogdan were decapitated on August 18, 1778.[55] Contemporary records suggest that they were killed at night in Iași's princely court, "in the tower that's facing the Bahlui"; their executioner was a Captain Pavăl from Cosăuți, who then left the severed heads exposed for public viewing, "on a rug by the gate of the court".[56] Dărmănescu received more clemency from the Prince: originally sentenced to have his right arm amputated, he was eventually dispatched to a monastery in Târgu Ocna.[57] Released before 1783, he dedicated himself to translating Masonic literature.[58] Other participants were also given less violent punishments, following requests from the clergy: some, such as the boyars' physician Dracache Depasta, were exiled and had their estates confiscated.[59]

Legacy

Romanian folklore commemorated the Spatharios with a lengthy ballad, which was probably composed shortly after his execution.[60] The fatherless family, including a nine-year old youngest son Ioan,[61] was again left exposed to poverty and persecution. Gheorghe Cuza (1762–1831), who inherited Bârzești, also held the office of Spatharios in 1813; married to Ralu Alcaz, he had a daughter, Ecaterina Cuza-Vârnav (died 1872).[62] Gheorghe and his brothers were instrumental in the process which led to the removal of Phanariote Princes, endorsing the nationalist memorandum of Ioniță Sandu Sturdza, who then became Prince.[63] A forerunner of Romanian liberalism, Gheorghe then had a conflict with Sturdza: supporting the constitutionalist Ionică Tăutu, he was detained for a while at Pângărați.[64] The Cuza properties suffered damages in 1821, when the Ottoman army followed the Sacred Band on Moldavian territory. They were later passed on to Gheorghe's son-in-law, Vornic Costachi Vârnav (distantly related to the politician Scarlat Vârnav).[65] Arghirie (1758–1826) and his wife Ileana Kostaki were based in Hotin County, from 1812 annexed to Russia, alongside other parts of Moldavia, as the Bessarabia Governorate. The couple's two daughters married, respectively, into the Rosetti and Miclescu families.[66] Constantin, who remained in Vaslui, became through his marriage the uncle of poet Vasile Alecsandri.[67]

Gheorghe, Arghirie and Constantin's male lines were extinguished before 1850, but the one starting with Nicolae Cuza (1755–1806) survived into the 20th century. With his Greek wife Nastasia Ziloti,[68] Nicolae had sons Gheorghe (1780–1835) and Ioan (1785–1848); a third, Grigore (1800–1869), died childless.[69] Ioan and Grigore both held offices as Ispravnici under the Regulamentul Organic regime, but were liberals, deeply involved in the Moldavian revolution of 1848.[70] The former married a Phanariote lady, Sultana Cozadini (1785–1865),[71] impoverished heiress of the Gozzadini and Scanavis families, with roots leading back into the Duchy of the Archipelago.[72]

Ioan and Sultana were parents to the most distinguished Cuza of the 19th century, Alexandru Ioan. A Colonel in the Moldavian military forces and participant in the 1848 revolt, he became friends and fellow inmates with Alecu Moruzi, who was a grandson of Prince Constantine.[73] Cuza sided with the National Party in the ad-hoc Divan.[74] That assembly elected him Moldavian Prince, then Domnitor of the United Principalities (nucleus of modern Romania), in 1859. In its validation of the election, the Moldavian deputies informed Cuza that the country had a "debt of honor to your family", and that they wished to "compensate the blood your ancestors have shed for the noble liberties".[75] In late 1861, Mihail Kogălniceanu reminded them of this pledge, as part of a speech against Alecu Moruzi, who was at the time Moldavia's Prime Minister, and who, Kogălniceanu alleged, was not a Moldavian national. The allusion was picked up by Românulŭ newspaper, who noted that Kogălniceanu was directly referring to Ioniță's killing.[75] A dispute erupted between Kogălniceanu and Grigore Cuza, who defended Moruzi's nationality rights—this paradox was also highlighted in Românulŭ.[76]

According to historian Gheorghe Ghibănescu, Ioniță and his sons were "planted" in the Moldavian soil, a "trunk" for Alexandru Ioan's growth.[77] However, shortly before the 1866 coup which toppled him, the Domnitor surrounded himself mostly with his Cozadini relatives, who became a camarilla;[78] Alecu Moruzi also remained close to this circle.[79] Alexandru Ioan Cuza's line existed for one more generation after his death in exile, ending in 1889, when his surviving son, the pretender Alexandru "Sașa" Cuza, died in Madrid.[80] He had been married to Alecu Moruzi's daughter Maria—a matter which stirred much controversy, particularly after she took ownership of Cuza estates.[81]

The Domnitor's uncle Gheorghe (the second) was the grandfather of the Bessarabian opera singer Valentina Cuza-Bleichmann,[82] as well as of another political figure, A. C. Cuza.[83] Originally a socialist,[84] the latter Cuza first achieved notoriety in 1910, when he put out the "first publicly antisemitic program".[85] He founded the National-Christian Defense League, then the National Christian Party. The latter group also involved his son, also named Gheorghe, a published sonneteer,[86] who vied with other figures for control of the antisemitic movement from 1935.[87] Both father and son were directly involved in persecuting the Romanian Jews, in particular during and after the 1941 Iași pogrom.[88] Of the landmarks still associated with Ioniță, the manor in Bârzești was purchased in 1892 by the Ioanid family. It was nationalized, then demolished, under the communist regime.[89]

Notes

1. Gorovei, pp. 10–11
2. Gorovei, p. 11; Stoicescu, p. 392
3. Gorovei, p. 11
4. Bezviconi I, p. 95 & II, p. 49
5. Gorovei, p. 11
6. Sorin Iftimi, Vechile blazoane vorbesc. Obiecte armoriate din colecții ieșene, p. 169. Iași: Palatul Culturii, 2014. ISBN 978-606-8547-02-2
7. Emanuel Hagi-Mosco, Steme boerești din România, Bucharest: Socec, 1918
8. Stoicescu, p. 392
9. Gorovei, pp. 10–11
10. Stoicescu, p. 392. See also Bezviconi I, p. 111; Gorovei, p. 11
11. Bezviconi I, p. 111
12. Gorovei, p. 11
13. Gorovei, p. 10
14. Stoicescu, p. 392. See also Gorovei, p. 11
15. Popa & Rotaru, p. 139
16. Gorovei, p. 11
17. Stoicescu, pp. 391, 393. See also Atanasiu, p. 77; Gorovei, p. 12; Popa & Rotaru, p. 140
18. Djuvara, p. 346
19. Bezviconi I, p. 185
20. Atanasiu, p. 73; Gorovei, p. 11
21. Gorovei, p. 11
22. Vogoride-Konaki, pp. 17–18
23. Gorovei, pp. 11–12. See also Vogoride-Konaki, pp. 16–20; Xenopol, pp. 37–40
24. Stoicescu, p. 392; Vogoride-Konaki, p. 20; Xenopol, p. 39
25. Gorovei, p. 12
26. Xenopol, p. 39
27. Gorovei, p. 12
28. Popa & Rotaru, p. 139
29. Gorovei, p. 12
30. Popa & Rotaru, p. 138
31. Atanasiu, p. 77
32. Popa & Rotaru, p. 139
33. Gorovei, p. 12
34. Gorovei, p. 12
35. Gorovei, p. 12
36. Gorovei, pp. 12–13. See also Xenopol, pp. 105–109
37. Popa & Rotaru, p. 139
38. Popa & Rotaru, pp. 138–139
39. Paul Cernovodeanu, "Elemente incipiente ale burgheziei în societatea românească sub fanarioți", in Revista de Istorie, Vol. 40, Issue 5, 1987, p. 484
40. Popa & Rotaru, p. 140
41. Popa & Rotaru, p. 140
42. Gorovei, p. 13
43. Popa & Rotaru, p. 140
44. Gorovei, p. 13
45. Popa & Rotaru, p. 139
46. Gorovei, p. 13
47. Popa & Rotaru, p. 139
48. Gorovei, p. 13
49. Djuvara, p. 317
50. Gorovei, p. 13
51. Iorga (1928), p. 301
52. Grigoruță, p. 39
53. Grigoruță, p. 39
54. Xenopol, pp. 182–183
55. Gorovei, p. 13; Grigoruță, pp. 38–39. See also Djuvara, p. 317; Iorga (1928), p. 301; Popa & Rotaru, p. 140; Xenopol, p. 182
56. Grigoruță, p. 39
57. Grigoruță, p. 39; Iorga (1928), pp. 301–302
58. Iorga (1928), pp. 301–303
59. Grigoruță, p. 39
60. Gorovei, p. 13
61. Gorovei, p. 13
62. Popa & Rotaru, pp. 140, 142–143, 146–150
63. Gorovei, p. 13; Popa & Rotaru, pp. 140–141
64. Gorovei, p. 13
65. Popa & Rotaru, pp. 141–150
66. Bezviconi I p. 119 & II, p. 31
67. Bezviconi I, p. 34
68. Bezviconi II, p. 49
69. Gorovei, pp. 13, 14
70. Gorovei, pp. 13–14
71. Gorovei, p. 13
72. Sturdza, pp. 15–17
73. Iorga (1938), pp. 125–127
74. Gorovei, p. 13
75. Mihail Kogălniceanu, "Cuvîntu în contra alegeriĭ și a eligibilitățiĭ D-luĭ Alecsandru C. Morud̦i", in Românulŭ, December 26, 1861, p. 1136
76. S***, "Corespondință particulariă a Romanuluĭ. Jassĭ, 9 Decembre", in Românulŭ, December 20, 1861, p. 1110
77. Popa & Rotaru, p. 139
78. Sturdza, pp. 16, 18
79. Iorga (1938), pp. 367–368, 396–397
80. Constantin Chiper, "Elena Cuza în memoria românilor (2)", in Forțele Terestre. Buletin de Teorie Militară Editat de Statul Major al Forțelor Terestre, Nr. 1/2010, p. 176
81. Nicolae Grigoraș, "Dramele Ruginoasei", in Magazin Istoric, October 1968, p. 15
82. Bezviconi II, p. 32
83. Gorovei, p. 13
84. Călinescu, p. 546
85. Ornea, p. 395
86. Călinescu, p. 1031
87. Ornea, pp. 246, 256–257
88. Jean Ancel, Preludiu la asasinat. Pogromul de la Iași, 29 iunie 1941, p. 385. Iași: Polirom, 2005. ISBN 973-681-799-7
89. Popa & Rotaru, pp. 141, 144

References

• Mihai-Bogdan Atanasiu, "Contribuții prosopografice: doi logofeți din familia Donici", in Analele Științifice ale Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iași. Istorie, Vols. LIV–LV, 2008–2009, pp. 69–80.
• Gheorghe G. Bezviconi, Boierimea Moldovei dintre Prut și Nistru, Vol. I. Bucharest: Fundația Regele Carol I, 1940; Vol. II, Bucharest: National Institute of History, 1943.
• George Călinescu, Istoria literaturii române de la origini pînă în prezent. Bucharest: Editura Minerva, 1986.
• Neagu Djuvara, Între Orient și Occident. Țările române la începutul epocii moderne. Bucharest: Humanitas, 1995. ISBN 973-28-0523-4
• Ștefan S. Gorovei, "Cronici de familii: Cuzeștii", in Magazin Istoric, December 1977, pp. 10–14.
• Sorin Grigoruță, "Un doctor ieșean în a doua jumătate a secolului XVIII: Dracache Depasta", in Anuarul Institutului de Istorie A. D. Xenopol, Vol. XLVII, 2010, pp. 33–47.
• Nicolae Iorga,
  • Francmasoni și conspiratori în Moldova secolului al XVIII-lea. Bucharest: Cultura Națională, 1928. OCLC 933398190
  • Istoria românilor. Volumul 9: Unificatorii. Bucharest & Vălenii de Munte: Așezământul Grafic Datina Românească, 1938. OCLC 490479129
• Z. Ornea, Anii treizeci. Extrema dreaptă românească. Bucharest: Editura Fundației Culturale Române, 1995. ISBN 973-9155-43-X
• Maria Popa, Doina Rotaru, "Biserica 'Nașterea Maicii Domnului' de la Bârzești-Vaslui", in Monumentul, Vol. XI, 2010, pp. 137–156.
• N. Stoicescu, Dicționar al marilor dregători din Țara Românească și Moldova. Sec. XIV–XVII. Bucharest: Editura enciclopedică, 1971. OCLC 822954574
• Mihai Dim. Sturdza, "Frații Cozadini", in Magazin Istoric, July 1999, pp. 15–18.
• Em. Vogoride-Konaki, "Schițe din viața și familia Logofĕtuluĭ Konaki", in Costache Conachi, Poesii. Alcătuiri și tălmăciri, pp. 5–96. Iași: Editura Librăriei Frații Șaraga, 1887. OCLC 819344488
• A. D. Xenopol, Istoria Românilor din Dacia Traiană. Vol. IX: Mavrocordații. 1711—1749. Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 1929. OCLC 895225629