Impeachment of Shirani Bandaranayake

Shirani Bandaranayake, the 43rd Chief Justice of Sri Lanka, was impeached by Parliament and then removed from office by President Mahinda Rajapaksa in January 2013.[1][2] Bandaranayake was accused of a number of charges including financial impropriety and interfering in legal cases,[3] all of which she has denied.[4] The impeachment followed a series of rulings against the government by the Supreme Court, including one against a bill proposed by Minister Basil Rajapaksa, President Rajapaksa's brother.[5] Bandaranayake was replaced as chief justice by former Attorney General Mohan Peiris.[6] Peiris is considered to be an ally of President Rajapaksa and his appointment is seen by critics as further consolidation of power by the president and his family.[7][8] Bandaranayake refused to recognise the impeachment and lawyers groups refused to work with the new chief justice.[9][10][11] Bandaranayake's controversial impeachment drew much criticism and concern from within and outside of Sri Lanka.[12] On 28 January 2015 she was reinstated and retired on 29 January, the next day.

Shirani Bandaranayake

Background

Bandaranayake was appointed to the Supreme Court on 30 October 1996 by President Chandrika Kumaratunga.[13][14] In 2011 President Mahinda Rajapaksa appointed Bandaranayake as Chief Justice, succeeding Asoka de Silva who retired on 17 May 2011. She took her oaths before President Rajapaksa on 18 May 2011.[13][14]

Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Bill

The Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Bill was published in The Sri Lanka Gazette on 17 October 2011.[15] The bill allowed the government to declare any land in a municipal, urban development or road development area as a "protected", "conservation", "architectural", "historical" or "sacred" area and to acquire that land.[16] According to the Constitution of Sri Lanka most land issues are devolved to the provincial councils. The Sri Lankan government introduced the bill in parliament on 8 November 2011.[17] The bill's constitutionality was challenged by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu in the Supreme Court. The court (Bandaranayake, Chandra Ekanayake and K. Sripavan) met on 21 November 2011 to hear the petition. The court's determination (S.C. Special Determination No. 03/2011) was conveyed to Speaker Chamal Rajapaksa, another brother of President Rajapaksa, on 2 December 2011 and on 3 December 2011 the Speaker announced the determination to Parliament: the bill was in respect of matters set out in the provincial council list and therefore cannot become law unless it has been referred to every provincial council.[18][19] The government withdrew the bill from parliament and referred it to the nine provincial councils.[20] The provincial councils expressed concern about the bill and suggested amendments.[21][22] The bill was opposed by the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress and Tamil Makkal Viduthalai Pulikal, both members of the United People's Freedom Alliance (UPFA), President Rajapaksa's party, as well as the opposition United National Party.[23][24] Faced with opposition, the government abandoned the bill in April 2012.[25]

Divi Neguma Bill

The Divi Neguma Bill was published in The Sri Lanka Gazette on 27 July 2012.[26] The bill established the Department of Divi Neguma Development by amalgamating the Samurdhi Authority of Sri Lanka, Southern Development Authority of Sri Lanka and the Udarata Development Authority, and created numerous community organisations, banks and banking societies.[27] The Department of Divi Neguma Development would be controlled by the Ministry of Economic Development headed by President Rajapaksa's brother Basil Rajapaksa and would carry out development activities.[28] According to the Constitution of Sri Lanka most development activities are devolved to the provincial councils. The Sri Lankan government introduced the bill in parliament on 10 August 2012.[29] The bill's constitutionality was consequently challenged by four petitioners on three petitions in the Supreme Court. The court (Bandaranayake, Priyasath Dep and Eva Wanasundera) met on 27 and 28 August 2012 to hear the petitions. Speaker Chamal Rajapaksa announced the Supreme Court's determinations (S.C. Special Determination No. 01/2012, 02/2012 and 03/2012) to Parliament on 18 September 2012: the bill was in respect of matters set out in the provincial council list and therefore cannot become law unless it has been referred to every provincial council.[30][31][32] The UPFA controlled eight of the nine provincial councils and between 25 September 2012 and 3 October 2012 all eight approved the Divi Neguma Bill. The ninth provincial council, Northern, had not been functioning as an elected body since it was established in 2007. The bill was approved by the Northern Province's Governor G. A. Chandrasiri who had been appointed by President Rajapaksa.[33]

The bill then returned to Parliament and a further eleven petitions were placed before the Supreme Court challenging the bill's constitutionality. Amongst these petitions was one filed on 4 October 2012 by opposition MP Mavai Senathirajah challenging the legality of Chandrasiri's approving the bill.[34] The court (Bandaranayake, N. G. Amaratunga and K. Sripavan) met on 18, 22, and 23 October 2012 to hear the petitions. The Supreme Court's determinations were passed to the president on 31 October 2012.[35][36] Speaker Chamal Rajapaksa announced the Supreme Court's determinations to Parliament on 6 November 2012: clause 8(2) was unconstitutional and needed to be approved by a referendum; twelve other clauses were inconsistent with the constitution and needed to be passed by special majority (two-thirds) of Parliament; the governor of the Northern Province does not have the power to endorse the bill and therefore Parliament needed to pass the bill by special majority.[37][38][39]

The government amended the bill to avoid holding a referendum.[40] The amended Divi Neguma Bill was passed by Parliament on 8 January 2013 with the required two-thirds majority.[41][42]

Impeachment

An impeachment motion against Chief Justice Bandaranayake signed by 117 UPFA MPsA was handed to Speaker Chamal Rajapaksa on 1 November 2012, the day after the Supreme Court's determinations on the Divi Neguma Bill were passed to the president.[43][44] Speaker Chamal Rajapaksa revealed the 14 chargesB against Bandaranayake on 6 November 2012 which included failing to disclose financial interests, abuse of power and disregarding the constitution.[45] Bandaranayake denied the charges.[46]

Parliamentary Select Committee

An eleven-member parliamentary select committee (PSC)C consisting of seven government MPs and four opposition MPs was appointed to hear the impeachment charges.[47] Impeachment hearings were held on 23 November 2012, 4 December 2012 and 6 December 2012 when Bandaranayake walked out of the hearing.[48][49][50] The opposition MPs withdrew from the PSC on 7 December 2012.[51][52] The PSC's report was presented to Parliament on 8 December 2012.[53] The PSC found that three of five charges against Bandaranayake had been proven and this was enough to remove her from office.[54][55] She was found guilty of impropriety in a property transaction (1st charge), having undeclared bank accounts (4th charge) and conflict of interest in a legal case involving her husband (5th charge).[56][57] She was found not guilty on the 2nd and 3rd charges and the remaining nine charges were disregarded by the PSC.[58] Opposition MPs have rejected the PSC report, saying "This was not an inquiry it was an inquisition".[59] The PSC's report was them sent to President Rajapaksa.[60]

The Supreme Court (N. G. Amaratunga, Priyasath Dep and K. Sripavan) ruled on 1 January 2013 that the PSC had no power to investigate allegations against the chief justice and the impeachment was therefore unconstitutional.[61][62]

Bandaranayake appealed against the PSC and on 7 January 2013 the Court of Appeal quashed the PSC's findings.[63][64] Two Court of Appeal judges, S. Sriskandarajah and Anil Goonarathne, subsequently received death threats.[65][66]

Impeachment motion and removal from office

The government ignored the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal rulings and went ahead with the impeachment.[67] The impeachment motion against Bandaranayake was debated by Parliament on 10 and 11 January 2013.[68] The motion was passed by Parliament with 155 MPs voting for and 49 MPs voting against it.D[69] Opposition MPs described the impeachment motion as flawed and therefore invalid.[70]

Bandaranayake was removed from office on 13 January 2013 after President Mahinda Rajapaksa ratified the impeachment motion passed by Parliament.[71][72] According to some reports Rajapaksa had offered to allow Bandaranayake to retire but she had refused.[73][74]

Aftermath

After the impeachment motion passed Parliament, Bandaranayake indicated that she would not leave office, citing the Supreme Court ruling declaring the PSC unconstitutional.[75] Lawyers groups urged the Supreme Court judges not to sit with any new Chief Justice.[76]

President Rajapaksa nominated former Attorney General Mohan Peiris to succeed Bandaranayake.[77][78] According to the constitution of Sri Lanka, the president must refer his nomination to the Parliamentary Council for "observations" but it is the president who makes the appointment.[79] The five member Parliamentary Council consists of the Speaker, Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition, a nominee of the Prime Minister and a nominee of the Leader of the Opposition. The Parliamentary Council met on 15 January 2013 to discuss the appointment but Leader of the Opposition Ranil Wickremasinghe and his nominee D. M. Swaminathan did not attend as they were opposed to the Council.[80][81] The Parliamentary Council gave its approval for Peiris's appointment on 15 January 2013.[82][83] Peiris was sworn in as chief justice at 12.30pm on 15 January 2013.[84][85] Peiris was a legal adviser to President Rajapaksa and his government and was prominent in defending Rajapaksa's government from allegations of human rights violations and enforced disappearances.[86][87] He had never served as a judge and is seen as an ally of the president.[87][88]

Bandaranayake vacated her official residence at 5.30pm on 15 January 2013 and issued a statement in which she insisted she was still the legitimate chief justice and that the charges against her were all "blatant lies".[89][90] As she left Bandaranayake told reporters she feared for her family's safety.[91][92]

After the impeachment three senior lawyers who had supported Bandaranayake received threatening letters.[93][94]

Peiris was officially inaugurated as chief justice at a ceremony in the Supreme Court on 23 January 2013.[95] The media, other than the state-owned media, were banned from the ceremony which was boycotted by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), the largest lawyers association in the country.[96][97] The ceremony was however attended by other judges including the associate judges of the Supreme Court.[98]

A fundamental rights petition was filled by the CPA challenging the new appointment of the Chief Justice, as the CPA contends the appointment as illegal and in violation of their rights and the rights of the people.[99] They sought two interim reliefs that would have prevented the approval of the new Chief Justice and the prevention of his accepting the post and the functioning of his office.[87][100] Three other fundamental rights petitions against the impeachment have also been referred to the Supreme Court.[101] These petitions will be heard by a panel of at least five Supreme Court judges.[102] It is reported that the government is hoping that a fuller bench of the Supreme Court will reverse the 1 January 2013 ruling that the PSC was unconstitutional.[103]

The International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI) had established a four-member delegation headed by former Chief Justice of India J. S. Verma to visit Sri Lanka on a fact-finding mission about the impeachment.[104] The other members of the delegation were Baroness Prashar, Shane Keenan and Sadakat Kadri.[105] The mission had to be cancelled after the Sri Lankan government withdrew the delegates visas on 29/30 January 2013.[106][107] The Sri Lankan government defended the visa withdrawal, stating that the delegation was intent on interfering in the country's sovereignty.[108][109]

Reaction

Bandaranayake's controversial impeachment drew much criticism and concern from within and outside of Sri Lanka.[110][111]

Sri Lanka

Opposition politicians, lawyers, judges and other civil society groups criticised the impeachment as an attempt to curb the independence of the judiciary and concentrate powers with President Rajapaksa.[112][113] They also claim the impeachment is in retaliation for the Supreme Court blocking the Divi Neguma Bill.[114] After the impeachment motion had been passed opposition MP Mangala Samaraweera claimed that Sri Lanka had become a dictatorship: "Up to yesterday at least we kept up appearances of being at least a nominal democracy. But as of Friday night, the Rajapaksa Government sheds the façade and the country becomes a pariah of the international community".[115]

Former Chief Justices

41st Chief Justice of Sri Lanka Sarath N. Silva expressed disappointment over the appointment of former Attorney General Mohan Peiris. Silva proposed the appointment of a sitting Supreme Court judge saying, "given the controversy that has been created over the impeachment of the Chief Justice, only the appointment of a senior Supreme Court judge as the next Chief Justice would have resolved the problem."[116]

International

 United Nations - In November 2012 United Nations Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Gabriela Knaul, urged the Sri Lankan government to reconsider the impeachment and ensure that any hearing complies with "the fundamental principles of due process and fair trial".[117]

At a press briefing on 18 January 2013 United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay expressed deep concern about the impeachment which had "further eroded the rule of law in the country and could also set back efforts for accountability and reconciliation".[118][119] Pillay went on to describe the "flawed" impeachment as a "gross interference in the independence of the judiciary and a calamitous setback for the rule of law in Sri Lanka".[118] Pillay also expressed doubts about the independence and impartiality of Bandaranayake's successor Mohan Peiris.[118]

Commonwealth Secretary General Kamalesh Sharma issued a statement on 15 November 2012 in which he expressed concern about the impeachment, stating that Sri Lankan constitutional provisions regarding independence of the judiciary must be respected.[120] Sharma issued another statement, on 11 January 2013, which stated that "The Commonwealth, collectively, is profoundly concerned about this situation" and urged the Sri Lankan government to pause and carefully consider the ramifications before taking any decision on impeachment.[121][122] On 13 January 2013 Sharma issued a third statement which expressed disappointment at Bandaranayake's dismissal, stating "The dismissal of the Chief Justice will be widely seen..as running counter to the independence of the judiciary, which is a core Commonwealth value."[123][124]

 European Union - High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton issued a statement on 18 January 2013 which expressed concern about the impeachment process, stating "the independence of the judicial branch cannot be made subject to actions by any other branch of government".[125][126] The statement went on to urge the Sri Lankan government to implement the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and ensure the safety of Bandaranayake.[125]

 Canada - Foreign Minister John Baird issued a statement on 11 January 2013 condemning Parliament's interference in the judiciary, describing the impeachment as "highly politicized, lacking basic transparency and respect for the guarantees of due process and fair trial".[127]

 United Kingdom - The Foreign and Commonwealth Office issued a statement on 11 January 2013 in which the British government expressed deep concern about the impeachment process, noting that "The motion to impeach the Chief Justice runs contrary to the clear rulings of Sri Lanka’s highest courts and the proceedings appear to contravene basic principles of fairness, due process and respect for the independence of the judiciary and the Commonwealth Latimer House Principles".[128] The statement went on to urge the Sri Lankan government to "respect democratic principles".[128]

 United States - The United States Department of State issued a statement on 2 November 2012 which expressed concern about the impeachment and urged the Sri Lankan government not to interfere with the independence of the judiciary.[129] The department issued another statement, on 7 December 2012, which urged the Sri Lankan government to "guarantee due process, and to ensure that all investigations are conducted transparently and in accordance with the rule of law".[130] The US embassy in Colombo issued a press release on 12 January 2013 in which expressed deep concern about the impeachment and urged the Sri Lankan government to "uphold the rule of law and respect the principles of democratic governance".[131][132] At a press briefing on 15 January 2013 State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland expressed concern about the impeachment's impact on the democratic process, saying "we were concerned about the perception of reprisals against somebody for independent thinking and action".[133] The following day Nuland stated that the explanation given by the Sri Lankan government regarding the impeachment was not "satisfactory in terms of protecting democracy".[134][135]

Other

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) issued a statement on 6 December 2012 which stated that the impeachment process ignored "international standards and practice" and urged the Sri Lankan government to uphold the independence of the judiciary.[136] The ICJ then issued a statement on 11 January 2013 which condemned the impeachment, stating "Sri Lanka’s parliament and executive have effectively decapitated the country’s judiciary in pursuit of short term political gain. As an immediate matter, this has precipitated a legal and constitutional crisis of unprecedented dimensions".[137][138] On 15 January 2013 ICJ issued a statement which condemned Mohan Peiris' appointment as chief justice, describing it as a "further assault on the independence of the judiciary" and called for Bandaranayake's re-instatement.[139][140] On 23 January 2013 44 senior judges and jurists from around the globe wrote an open letter to President Rajapaksa which condemned Bandaranayake's removal, urged her re-instatement, saying that the impeachment was "in contravention of the Constitution, international human rights law and standards, including the right to a fair hearing, and the rule of law".[141][142]

Reinstatement

On 28 January 2015 the government of Sri Lanka, having removed all obstacles for Bandaranayake to hold her position as the 43rd Chief Justice by the President Maithripala Sirisena, on the grounds that her 2013 impeachment was unlawful and as such the appointment of Mohan Peiris, her successor, was void Ab initio. This paved the way for Bandaranayake to resume duties on 28 January 2015.[143]

Retirement

On 28 January 2015, the day that she resumed duties, Bar Association of Sri Lanka Chairman Upul Jayasuriya said that a special function had been organized in view of Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake retiring from serving as Chief Justice with effect from the following day, 29 January 2015.[144][145]

See also

Footnotes
^A 117 signatories of impeachment motion (all UPFA)[146]
^B Fourteen charges against Chief Justice Bandaranayake[146]
  • 1. Whereas by purchasing, in the names of two individuals, i.e. Renuka Niranjali Bandaranayake and Kapila Ranjan Karunaratne using special power of attorney licence bearing No. 823 of Public Notary K.B. Aroshi Perera that was given by Renuka Niranjali Bandaranayake and Kapila Ranjan Karunaratne residing at No. 127, Ejina Street, Mount Hawthorn, Western Australia, 6016, Australia, the house bearing No. 2C/F2/P4 and assessment No. 153/1-2/4 from the housing scheme located at No. 153, Elvitigala Mawatha, Colombo 08 belonging to the company that was known as Ceylinco Housing and Property Company and City Housing and Real Estate Company Limited and Ceylinco Condominium Limited and is currently known as Trillium Residencies which is referred in the list of property in the case of fundamental rights application No. 262/2009, having removed another bench of the Supreme Court which was hearing the fundamental rights application cases bearing Nos. 262/2009, 191/2009 and 317/2009 filed respectively in the Supreme Court against Ceylinco Sri Ram Capital Management, Golden Key Credit Card Company and Finance and Guarantee Company Limited belonging to the Ceylinco Group of Companies and taking up further hearing of the aforesaid cases under her court and serving as the presiding judge of the benches hearing the said cases;
  • 2. Whereas, in making the payment for the purchase of the above property, by paying a sum of Rs 19,362,500 in cash, the manner in which such sum of money was earned had not been disclosed, to the companies of City Housing and Real Estate Company Limited and Trillium Residencies prior to the purchase of the said property;
  • 3. Whereas, by not declaring in the annual declaration of assets and liabilities that should be submitted by a judicial officer, the details of approximately Rs. 34 million in foreign currency deposited at the branch of NDB Bank located at Dharmalpala Mawatha, Colombo 07 in accounts 106450013024, 101000046737, 100002001360 and 100001014772 during the period from 18 April 2011 to 27 March 2012;
  • 4. Whereas, by not declaring in the annual declaration of assets and liabilities that should be submitted by a judicial officer the details of more than twenty bank accounts maintained in various banks including nine accounts bearing numbers 106450013024, 101000046737, 100002001360, 100001014772, 100002001967, 100101001275, 100110000338, 100121001797 and 100124000238 in the aforesaid branch of NDB Bank;
  • 5. Whereas, Mr. Pradeep Gamini Suraj Kariyawasam, the lawful husband of the said Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake is a suspect in relation to legal action initiated at the Magistrate’s Court of Colombo in connection with the offences regarding acts of bribery and/or corruption under the Commission to Investigate into Allegations of Bribery or Corruption Act, No 19 of 1994; Whereas, the post of Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission which is vested with powers to transfer, disciplinary control and removal of the Magistrate of the said court which is due to hear the aforesaid bribery or corruption case is held by the said Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake as per Article 111D (2) of the Constitution;
Whereas, the powers to examine the judicial records, registers and other documents maintained by the aforesaid court are vested with the said Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake under Article 111H (3) by virtue of being the Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission;
Whereas, the Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake becomes unsuitable to continue in the office of the Chief Justice due to the legal action relevant to the allegations of bribery and corruption levelled against Mr. Pradeep Gamini Suraj Kariyawasam, the lawful husband of the said Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake in the aforesaid manner, and as a result of her continuance in the office of the Chief Justice, administration of justice is hindered and the fundamentals of administration of justice are thereby violated and whereas not only administration of justice but visible administration of justice should take place;
  • 6. Whereas, despite the provisions made by Article 111H of the Constitution that the Secretary of the Judicial Service Commission shall be appointed from among the senior judicial officers of the courts of first instance, the Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake acting as the Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission by virtue of being the Chief Justice, has violated Article 111H of the Constitution by disregarding the seniority of judicial officers in executing her duties as the Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission through the appointment of Mr. Manjula Thilakaratne who is not a senior judicial officer of the courts of first instance, while there were such eligible officers;
  • 7. Whereas, with respect to the Supreme Court special ruling Nos. 2/2012 and 3/2012 the said Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake has disregarded and /or violated Article 121 (1) of the Constitution by making a special ruling of the Supreme Court to the effect that the provisions set out in the Constitution are met by the handing over of a copy of the petition filed at the court to the Secretary General of Parliament despite the fact that it has been mentioned that a copy of a petition filed under Article 121 (1) of the Constitution shall at the same time be delivered to the Speaker of Parliament;
  • 8. Whereas, Article 121(1) of the Constitution has been violated by the said Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake despite the fact that it had been decided that the mandatory procedure set out in the said Article of the Constitution must be followed in accordance of the interpretation given by the Supreme Court in the special decisions of the Supreme Court bearing Nos. 5/91, 6/91, 7/91 and 13/91;
  • 9. Whereas, irrespective of the absolute ruling stated by the Supreme Court in the fundamental rights violation case, President’s Counsel Edward Francis William Silva and three others versus Shirani Bandaranayake (1992 New Law Reports of Sri Lanka 92) challenging the appointment of the Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake, when she was appointed as a Supreme Court judge, she has acted in contradiction to the said ruling subsequent to being appointed to the office of the Supreme Court judge;
  • 10. Whereas, the Supreme Court special rulings petition No. 02/2012 filed by the institution called Centre for Policy Alternatives to which the Media Publication Section ‘Groundview’ that had published an article of the Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake, while she was a lecturer of the Law Faculty of the University of Colombo prior to becoming a Supreme Court judge, has been heard and a ruling given;
  • 11. Whereas, in the case, President’s Counsel Edward Francis William Silva and three others versus Shirani Bandaranayake (1992 New Law Reports of Sri Lanka 92) that challenged the suitability of the appointment of the Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake who holds the office of the Chief Justice and thereby holds the office of the ex-officio Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission in terms of the Constitution, Attorney-at-Law L.C.M. Swarnadhipathi, the brother of the Magistrate Kuruppuge Beeta Anne Warnasuriya Swarnadhipathi filed a petition against the appointment of the said Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake owing to which the Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake has harassed the said Magistrate Kuruppuge Beeta Anne Warnasuriya Swarnadhipathi;
  • 12. Whereas, the Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake who holds the office of the Chief Justice and thereby holds the office of the ex-officio Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission in terms of Article 111D (2) of the Constitution has, by acting ultra vires the powers vested in her by the Article 111H of the Constitution ordered the Magistrate (Mrs.) Rangani Gamage’s right to obtain legal protection for lodging a complaint in police against the harassment meted out to her by Mr. Manjula Thilakaratne, the Secretary of the Judicial Service Commission;
  • 13. Whereas, the said Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake being the Chief Justice and thereby being the Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission, in terms of Article 111D (2) of the Constitution, has abused her powers by ordering the Magistrate (Mrs.) Rangani Gamage to obtain permission of the Judicial Service Commission prior to seeking police protection thereby preventing her from exercising her legal right to obtain legal protection;
  • 14. Whereas, the Hon. (Dr.) (Mrs.) Upatissa Atapattu Bandaranayake Wasala Mudiyanse Ralahamilage Shirani Anshumala Bandaranayake by performing her duties as the Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission has referred a letter through the Secretary of the Judicial Service Commission to the Magistrate (Mrs.)Rangani Gamage, calling for explanation from her as to why a disciplinary inquiry should not be conducted against her for seeking protection from the Inspector General of Police by exercising her legal right;
By acting in the aforesaid manner,—
(i) whereas it amounts to improper conduct or conduct unbecoming of a person holding the office of the Chief Justice;
(ii) whereas she had been involved in matters that could amount to causes of action or controversial matters,
(iii) whereas she had influenced the process of delivery of justice,
(iv) whereas there can be reasons for litigants to raise accusations of partiality/ impartiality,
she has plunged the entire Supreme Court and specially the office of the Chief Justice into disrepute.
^C Composition of Parliamentary Select Committee
Government (7) - Anura Priyadharshana Yapa (chair), Nimal Siripala de Silva, Dilan Perera, Neomal Perera, Susil Premajayanth, Rajitha Senaratne and Wimal Weerawansa.
Opposition (4) - John Amaratunga, Vijitha Herath, Lakshman Kiriella and R. Sampanthan.
^D Voting on impeachment motion[147]

References
  1. "CJ receives order of removal". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 13 January 2013.
  2. "President removes CJ". The Nation (Sri Lanka). 13 January 2013. Archived from the original on 1 February 2013.
  3. "Sri Lanka chief justice faces impeachment hearing". Dawn/Associated Press. 23 November 2012.
  4. "Rajapaksa sacks Lanka's first woman CJ". Hindustan Times/Press Trust of India. 13 January 2013. Archived from the original on 22 January 2013.
  5. Magnier, Mark (13 January 2013). "Sri Lankan president dismisses nation's first female chief justice". Los Angeles Times.
  6. Shihar Aneez; Ranga Sirilal (15 January 2013). "Sri Lanka president picks ally as chief justice, lawyers protest". Reuters.
  7. Crabtree, James (15 January 2013). "Sri Lanka appoints new chief justice". Financial Times.
  8. Francis, Krishan (15 January 2013). "Sri Lankan leader replaces chief justice with ally". The Guardian/Associated Press.
  9. Buncombe, Andrew (13 January 2013). "Sri Lanka faces constitutional crisis as president sacks chief justice". The Independent.
  10. Shihar Aneez; Ranga Sirilal (13 January 2013). "Sri Lanka's Rajapaksa removes chief justice after impeachment". Reuters.
  11. "Sri Lanka Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake is impeached". BBC News. 11 January 2013.
  12. "Sri Lankan president ratifies chief justice's dismissal in impeachment standoff with judiciary". The Washington Post/Associated Press. 13 January 2013.
  13. "Her Lordship! First Woman Chief Justice sworn in". Daily FT. 19 May 2011. Archived from the original on 12 February 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  14. "Dr Shirani Bandaranayake new Chief Justice". Daily News (Sri Lanka). 19 May 2011. Archived from the original on 28 January 2013.
  15. "TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (AMENDMENT) A BILL to amend the Town and Country Planning Ordinance (Chapter 269)" (PDF). The Gazette of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. 1769. 27 July 2012.
  16. Bandara, Kelum (8 November 2013). "Town and Country Planning Ordinance to be ammended". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  17. "Business of the House". Parliament of Sri Lanka. 8 November 2011.
  18. "Parliamentary Debates: Official Report". Hansard. Parliament of Sri Lanka. 205 (3): 424–430. 3 December 2011.
  19. Kirinde, Chandani (4 December 2011). "Land takeover: SC refuses to give ruling". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka).
  20. Indrajith, Saman (7 December 2011). "Govt. withdraws Bill". The Island (Sri Lanka).
  21. Perera, Yohan (13 February 2012). "PCs to amend Town and Country Planning Bill". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  22. "Town and Country Planning Act stuck at PCs for scrutiny". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 12 February 2012.
  23. Abeywickrema, Mandana Ismail (19 February 2012). "Govt. Stance Unclear On Amendments Called By PCs". The Sunday Leader.
  24. Perera, Yohan (6 February 2012). "UNP to oppose Town and Country Planning Ordinance". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  25. Gunasekara, Tisaranee (24 January 2013). "The Impeachment As A Primer On The Rajapaksa Way". Colombo Telegraph.
  26. "Part II Divineguma A Bill" (PDF). The Gazette of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. 1769. 27 July 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 January 2013.
  27. Hemmathagama, Ashwin (24 October 2012). "More petitions against Divi Neguma Bill". Daily FT. Archived from the original on 27 January 2013. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  28. Weerakoon, Gagani (10 October 2012). "Divi Neguma presented in House". Ceylon Today. Archived from the original on 19 February 2013.
  29. "Business of the House". Parliament of Sri Lanka. 10 August 2012. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013.
  30. "Parliamentary Debates: Official Report". Hansard. Parliament of Sri Lanka. 210 (10): 1045–1069. 18 September 2012. Archived from the original on 2 November 2012.
  31. "Divi Negum bill needs approval of Provincial Councils". adaderana.lk. 18 September 2012.
  32. Bastians, Dharisha (4 October 2012). "TNA moves to restrain Northern Governor on Divi Neguma Bill". Daily FT. Archived from the original on 5 June 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  33. "Northern Governor gives nod for Divi Neguma". The Island (Sri Lanka). 27 September 2012.
  34. "SL Supreme Court to decide on governor's approval to Divineguma bill". TamilNet. 13 October 2012.
  35. "SC ruling on Divi Neguma bill delivered to Speaker". Daily FT. 1 November 2012. Archived from the original on 5 September 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  36. Ajantha Kumara Agalakada; Ranjan Katugampola (2 November 2012). "SC decision on Divi Neguma Bill conveyed to President". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  37. "Parliamentary Debates: Official Report". Hansard. Parliament of Sri Lanka. 211 (8): 1045–1069. 6 November 2012. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013.
  38. "Divi Neguma needs two-thirds majority and referendum to be passed in present form: SC". Daily FT. 7 November 2012. Archived from the original on 6 June 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  39. Ladduwahetty, Neville (11 November 2012). "Divi Neguma Bill and Supreme Court". The Island (Sri Lanka).
  40. Ganewatte, Shyam Nuwan (6 January 2013). "Ten amendments to Divineguma bill tomorrow". The Island (Sri Lanka).
  41. "Parliamentary Debates: Official Report". Hansard. Parliament of Sri Lanka. 214 (1): 64–211. 8 January 2013. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013.
  42. "Divi Neguma Bill passed with 107 majority". The Island (Sri Lanka). 8 January 2013.
  43. "Shirani Bandaranayake: Sri Lanka MPs' impeachment bid". BBC News. 2 November 2012.
  44. "Impeachment motion against CJ handed over to Speaker". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 1 November 2012.
  45. Haviland, Charles (6 November 2012). "Shirani Bandaranayake: Charges set out as impeachment begins". BBC News.
  46. Haviland, Charles (9 November 2012). "Shirani Bandaranayake denies Sri Lanka impropriety charges". BBC News.
  47. "CJ decides to stay on and fight". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 11 November 2012.
  48. "Further hearings on CJ's impeachment motion on Dec 4". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 23 November 2012.
  49. Kelum Bandara; Yohan Perera (5 December 2012). "PSC rejects observers". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  50. "CJ walks out of PSC, unlikely to return". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 6 December 2012.
  51. "Opposition members withdraw from PSC". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 7 December 2012.
  52. "Opposition withdraws from PSC". The Nation (Sri Lanka). 7 December 2012. Archived from the original on 24 June 2013.
  53. "PSC report presented". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 8 December 2012.
  54. "Sri Lanka chief judge Bandaranayake found guilty by MPs". BBC News. 8 December 2012.
  55. "Three out of five charges against CJ proven". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 8 December 2012.
  56. "Sri Lankan chief justice found guilty on 3 counts". Associated Press/New Jersey Herald. 8 December 2012.
  57. Weerakoon, Gagani (8 December 2012). "CJ found guilty of three charges -PSC". Ceylon Today. Archived from the original on 11 December 2012.
  58. "Sri Lanka Chief Justice found guilty on 3 charges". Colombo Page. 8 December 2012.
  59. Farisz, Hafeel (8 December 2012). "Opp. members of the PSC reject report". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  60. "Sri Lankan parliament recommends dismissal of chief justice". The Hindu. 8 December 2012.
  61. "Court rejects Sri Lanka judge Shirani Bandaranayake inquiry". BBC News. 3 January 2013.
  62. Farisz, Hafeel (3 January 2013). "PSC void, SC determines". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). Archived from the original on 4 June 2013. Retrieved 27 January 2013.
  63. "Court of Appeal quashes PSC report". Uthayan. 8 January 2013. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  64. Weeraratne, Chitra (7 January 2013). "Appeal Court quashes PSC findings on CJ". The Island (Sri Lanka).
  65. Hafeel Farisz; Dasun Rajapakshe (8 January 2013). "Appeal Court judges get threatening calls". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  66. Samarasinghe, Stanley (9 January 2013). "Judges threatened". Ceylon Today. Archived from the original on 12 January 2013.
  67. "Large crowds gather in Colombo to oppose impeachment of chief justice". South African Broadcasting Corporation/Reuters. 10 January 2013. Archived from the original on 28 January 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  68. Radhakrishnan, R. K. (10 January 2013). "Two-day debate on impeachment begins". The Hindu.
  69. "Sri Lanka's Parliament votes to impeach chief judge, deepening standoff with judiciary". The Washington Post/Associated Press. 11 January 2013.
  70. Farisz, Hafeel (11 January 2013). "Opposition contest resolution". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  71. "Sri Lanka president sacks chief justice Bandaranayake". BBC News. 13 January 2013.
  72. "Sri Lanka's first woman Chief Justice sacked". The Hindu/Press Trust of India. 13 January 2013.
  73. Jayasinghe, Ranjith Ananda (13 January 2013). "President wants CJ to retire". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka).
  74. "Sri Lanka fires first female chief justice". Al Jazeera. 13 January 2013.
  75. "Govt. considers new CJ but Shirani won't go". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 13 January 2013.
  76. "Resistance against any new CJ grows". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 13 January 2013.
  77. "Mohan Peiris nominated as next Chief Justice". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 14 January 2013.
  78. "Sri Lanka seals impeachment with new judge". Bangkok Post/Agence France-Presse. 15 January 2013.
  79. Bastians, Dharisha (15 January 2013). "President to appoint new CJ today". Daily FT.
  80. "Parliamentary Council to meet tomorrow over appointment of new CJ". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 14 January 2013.
  81. "Ranil won't go". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 14 January 2013.
  82. "Parliamentary Council approves Peiris as new CJ". The Nation (Sri Lanka). 15 January 2013. Archived from the original on 1 February 2013. Retrieved 27 January 2013.
  83. "Mohan Peries's name approved". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 15 January 2013.
  84. "New Sri Lanka chief justice Mohan Peiris sworn in amid opposition". BBC News. 15 January 2013.
  85. Bulathsinghala, Frances (16 January 2013). "New CJ of Sri Lanka sworn in". Dawn.
  86. Fernandez, Minelle (18 January 2013). "Sri Lanka: A tale of two chief justices". Al Jazeera.
  87. Radhakrishnan, R.K (15 January 2013). "Ex-Attorney General made Chief Justice". The Hindu.
  88. Francis, Krishan (15 January 2013). "Sri Lankan leader replaces chief justice with ally". The Huffington Post.
  89. "Ex-CJ vows to be with the people". The Island (Sri Lanka). 15 January 2013.
  90. Susitha R. Fernando; Hafeel Farisz (15 January 2013). "Video: 'I am still the Chief Justice'". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka).
  91. ""My life is in danger": Sri Lanka's impeached chief justice". Radio Australia. 16 January 2013.
  92. "Sri Lankan law chief says family in danger after sacking". The Sydney Morning Herald/Agence France-Presse. 17 January 2013.
  93. "Lawyers get threatening letters". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 17 January 2013.
  94. "Sri Lankan police probe death threat to lawyer". Zee News/Press Trust of India. 17 January 2013.
  95. "Sri Lanka lawyers boycott chief justice ceremony". BBC News. 23 January 2013.
  96. "Media blackout for ceremonial sitting". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 23 January 2013.
  97. "Sri Lanka's legal fraternity takes a stand for judicial independence". Radio Australia. 24 January 2013.
  98. "Rich and poor equal before the law – CJ Peiris". The Island (Sri Lanka). 23 January 2013.
  99. "CPA files FR against Mohan Peiris". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 15 January 2013.
  100. "New Chief Justice Mohan Peiris, PC assumes duties". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 15 January 2013.
  101. Bastians, Dharisha (22 January 2013). "Govt. moves to reverse SC ruling on Standing Orders". Daily FT.
  102. "Anti-impeachment petitions put to CJ". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 22 January 2013.
  103. Bastians, Dharisha (24 January 2013). "Apathy in the aftermath". Daily FT.
  104. Chhibber, Maneesh (3 February 2013). "'Refused' visa, Verma-led jurists' visit to Lanka off". The Indian Express.
  105. Bastians, Dharisha (2 February 2013). "Former Indian CJ changes his mind". Daily FT.
  106. "Forced postponement of IBAHRI high-level delegation visit to Sri Lanka". International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute. 1 February 2013.
  107. Narayan, S. Venkat (3 February 2013). "Former Indian Chief Justice JS Verma cancels visit as Sri Lanka refuses visa". Sunday Island (Sri Lanka).
  108. "Int'l Bar Assn. members violated visa rules-SL". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 3 February 2013.
  109. Radhakrishnan, R. K. (3 February 2013). "Sri Lanka clarifies on visa rejection". The Hindu.
  110. "Sri Lanka parliament votes to impeach chief justice". Australia Network/Agence France-Presse. 12 January 2013.
  111. "Sri Lanka draws flak over chief justice impeachment". France 24/Agence France-Presse. 12 January 2013.
  112. "Sri Lanka's chief justice found guilty". Al Jazeera. 8 December 2012.
  113. "Turmoil in bid to oust Sri Lankan justice". The New York Times/San Francisco Chronicle. 8 November 2012.
  114. "Shirani Bandaranayake: Sri Lanka judge impeachment hearing begins". BBC News. 23 November 2012.
  115. "Mangala calls Lanka an official dictatorship after impeachment vote". Daily FT. 12 January 2013.
  116. "Former Chief Justice of Sri Lanka disappointed with President's choice for top judge". ColomboPage. Retrieved 15 January 2013.
  117. "UN independent expert concerned over reports of intimidation of judges in Sri Lanka". UN News Centre. 14 November 2012.
  118. "Press briefing notes on Mali, Sri-Lanka, Zimbabwe and Iran". Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 18 January 2013.
  119. "UNHCR to release a report on SL". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 18 January 2013.
  120. "Commonwealth Secretary-General concerned about parliamentary move to impeach Sri Lankan chief justice". Commonwealth Secretariat. 15 November 2012. Archived from the original on 5 January 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  121. "Sri Lanka Impeachment: Commonwealth Secretary-General concerned and urges pause". Commonwealth Secretariat. 11 January 2013.
  122. "Carefully evaluate the ramifications- Commonwealth to SL". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 12 January 2013.
  123. "Dismissal of the Chief Justice in Sri Lanka". Commonwealth Secretariat. 13 January 2013.
  124. "Commonwealth Chief disappointed". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 14 January 2013.
  125. "Declaration by the High Representative, Catherine Ashton, on behalf of the EU on the impeachment of Sri Lankan Chief Justice" (PDF). European External Action Service. 18 January 2013.
  126. "EU criticizes impeachment of CJ". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 19 January 2013.
  127. "Canada Condemns Judicial Interference by Sri Lankan Parliament, Urges Commonwealth Action". Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. 11 January 2013.
  128. "UK deeply concerned by move to impeach Sri Lankan Chief Justice". Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 11 January 2013.
  129. "Impeachment Proceedings Brought Against Sri Lankan Chief Justice". United States Department of State. 2 November 2012.
  130. "Ongoing Concerns on Rule of Law in Sri Lanka". United States Department of State. 7 December 2012.
  131. "U.S. Embassy On Impeachment Process". Embassy of the United States in Sri Lanka and Maldives. 12 January 2013. Archived from the original on 15 January 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  132. "US deeply concerned". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 11 January 2013.
  133. "Daily Press Briefing". United States Department of State. 15 January 2013.
  134. "Daily Press Briefing". United States Department of State. 16 January 2013.
  135. "US not satisfied with government's explanation on impeachment of CJ". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 18 January 2013.
  136. "Sri Lanka: Chief Justice's impeachment hearing violates due process". International Commission of Jurists. 6 December 2012.
  137. "ICJ condemns impeachment of Sri Lanka's Chief Justice". International Commission of Jurists. 11 January 2013.
  138. "ICJ, condemns impeachment of Chief Justice". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 11 January 2013.
  139. "Sri Lanka: appointment of new Chief Justice undermines Rule of Law". International Commission of Jurists. 15 January 2013.
  140. "Reinstate ex-Chief Justice-ICJ". The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 16 January 2013.
  141. "Concerning the removal of Chief Justice Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake" (PDF). International Commission of Jurists. 23 January 2013.
  142. "International battle ahead; possible questions from Commonwealth". The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka). 27 January 2013.
  143. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-31021540
  144. http://www.hirunews.lk/102268/update-farewell-ceremony-to-43rd-cj
  145. https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/goodbye-to-the-first-ever-lady-chief-justice-of-sri-lanka/
  146. "Seventh Parliamentary First Session". Order Paper of Parliament. Parliament of Sri Lanka (222): 13–21. 9 November 2012. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  147. "Parliamentary Debates: Official Report". Hansard. Parliament of Sri Lanka. 214 (4): 510–666. 11 January 2013.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.