IBM 1130
The IBM 1130 Computing System, introduced in 1965,[1] was IBM's least expensive computer at that time. A binary 16-bit machine, it was marketed to price-sensitive, computing-intensive technical markets, like education and engineering, succeeding the decimal IBM 1620 in that market segment. Typical installations included a 1 megabyte disk drive that stored the operating system, compilers and object programs, with program source generated and maintained on punched cards. Fortran was the most common programming language used, but several others, including APL, were available.
The 1130 was also used as an intelligent front-end for attaching an IBM 2250 Graphics Display Unit, or as remote job entry (RJE) workstation, connected to a System/360 mainframe.
Description
The total production run of the 1130 has been estimated at 10,000.[2] The 1130 holds a place in computing history because it (and its non-IBM clones) gave many people their first direct interaction with a computer. Its price-performance ratio was good and it notably included inexpensive, removable disk storage, with reliable, easy-to-use software that supported several high-level languages. The low price (from around $32,000 or $41,000 with disk drive)[1] and well-balanced feature set enabled interactive "open shop" program development.
The IBM 1130 uses the same electronics packaging, called Solid Logic Technology (SLT), used in System/360. It has a 16-bit binary architecture, as do later minicomputers like the PDP-11 and Data General Nova.
The address space is 15 bits, limiting the 1130 to 32,768 16-bit words (65,536 bytes) of memory. The 1130 uses magnetic-core memory, which the processor addresses on word boundaries, using direct, indirect, and indexed addressing modes.
Models
IBM implemented five models of the 1131 Central Processing Unit, the primary processing component of the IBM 1130. The Model 1 through Model 5 describe the core memory cycle time, as well as the model's ability to support disk storage. A letter A through D appended to the model number indicates the amount of core memory installed.
IBM 1131 Central Processing Unit weighs about 760/1050 lb (345/477 kg).[3]
Memory cycle time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Core memory |
3.6 µs, no internal disk |
3.6 µs, plus disks |
2.2 µs, plus disks |
5.6 µs (3.6 µs: see below), single disk |
2.2 µs, no internal disk |
4096 words | Model 1A |
Model 2A |
--- |
Model 4A |
--- |
8192 words | Model 1B |
Model 2B |
Model 3B |
Model 4B |
Model 5B |
16,384 words | Model 1C |
Model 2C |
Model 3C |
--- |
Model 5C |
32,768 words | Model 1D |
Model 2D |
Model 3D |
--- |
Model 5D |
The Model 4 was a lower-priced product with a 5.6 µs cycle time. Some purchasers of performance upgrades observed that the field adjustment to achieve the improvement was surprisingly trivial.
The IBM 1132 printer relies on the 1130 processor rather than internal logic to determine when to fire the print wheels as they rotated. Printers for the Model 4 run more slowly, but the slower processor still can not keep up with it. The hardware manual discloses that when the Model 4 was servicing the two highest-level interrupts (the level 0 card-reader column interrupt or the level 1 printer interrupt), it ran at the faster 3.6 µs cycle time. Some users of the Model 4 would write a phony printer driver that did not dismiss the printer interrupt, in order to benefit from the higher processor speed. However, lower-level interrupts are disabled during this interval, even the end-of-card interrupt (level 4) from the 1442 card reader.
- Follow-on products
The IBM 1800 is a variant of the IBM 1130 for process control applications. It uses hardware rather than core memory for the three index registers and features two extra instructions (CMP and DCM) plus extra interrupt and I/O capabilities. It is a successor to the IBM 1710, as the IBM 1130 is a successor to the IBM 1620.
The IBM 1500 is a multi-user educational system based around either an IBM 1130 or an IBM 1800. It supports up to 32 student work stations, each with a variety of audio-visual capabilities.
Other than these, IBM produced no compatible successor systems to the 1130. The IBM System/7 is a process control and real-time system, and the IBM Series/1 is a general-purpose 16-bit minicomputer.
- Chronology
- February 11, 1965 – IBM introduces the 1130 (Models 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B). Also announced is the IBM 1132 printer, the lowest cost online computer printer ever announced by IBM at that time.
- Fourth quarter 1965 – First customer shipments begin from the San Jose plant.
- March 31, 1966 – IBM introduces the IBM 1500 educational system.
- April 1966 – IBM 1800 ships.[4]:497
- August 9, 1966 – IBM rolls out the 1130 synchronous communications adapter, which permits the small 1130 system to be connected by regular leased telephone lines to, and function as a communications terminal for, any model of the IBM System/360.
- April 17, 1967 – A four-way expansion of the 1130 is announced (Models 2C, 2D, 3B, 3C, and 3D), involving:
- Five times the disk storage and four times the core memory;
- An additional processing speed almost 40 percent faster than previously available;
- More and faster peripheral equipment, including an optical mark reader;
- An improved commercial programming package.
- January 1968 – First shipments begin of the 1130 Models 2C, 2D, 3B, 3C, and 3D.
- July 1968 – The Boca Raton plant begins shipping the 1130.
- July 22, 1971 – 1130 Models 4A and 4B are introduced at new levels of economy.
- September 1971 – First customer shipments begin of the 1130 Model 4.
- May 31, 1972 – Models 1C, 1D, 5B, 5C and 5D are announced.
- 1973 - The Xerox 530 was marketed as a possible successor to IBM 1130 customers.[5][6][7] Orders for the Xerox 530 were deemed "encouraging" as of January 1974.[8]
Software
To maximize speed and conserve space, the operating system and compilers are written entirely in assembly language and employ techniques that are rare today, including intermixing code and data as well as self-modifying code.
Much user programming was done in Fortran. The 1130 Fortran compiler can run on a machine with only 4,096 words of core—though the compiled program might not fit on such a machine. In this multi-pass compiler, each "phase" processes the entire source program and takes it another step toward machine code. For example, the first phase reads the source statements into memory, discards comment lines, removes spaces except in text literals, concatenates continuation lines and identifies labels. The compiler was available in a disk-resident version as well as on 8-channel punched paper tape or punched cards.
The most widely used operating system for the 1130 was the Disk Monitor System Version 2 (DM2) introduced in 1967. DM2 is a single-task batch-oriented system. It requires a system with at least 4 KB of core memory and one integrated 2310 disk drive for system residence. The Supervisor is tiny by modern standards, containing assorted system details such as first-level interrupt routines, called Interrupt Level Subroutines, plus the disk driver and routines to load the interpreter of job control commands and the card reader driver. Device drivers for other I/O devices required by a job are incorporated as part of the loading of that job, which might also include the replacement of the basic disk driver by a more advanced driver. During the execution of a job, only a resident monitor, called the Skeleton Supervisor, resides in memory. This Supervisor requires just 1020 bytes, so a task's first available memory started with address /01FE (hexadecimal) or word 510. When the job ended or was aborted, the Supervisor loaded the Monitor Control Record Analyzer (MCRA) to read the job control for the next. While the job is running, the Supervisor is inactive. Aside from device drivers and interrupt processing all CPU time is entirely devoted to the job's activities. Other programs distributed as part of the operating system were a core dump utility, DUMP, and the Disk Utility Program, DUP.
A Card/Paper Tape Programming System was available to support systems without disk.
There is a hierarchy of device drivers: those ending in Z are for Fortran, such as DISKZ, while assembler programmers might use DISK0, and DISK1 was even faster at reading multiple disk sectors. But DISKZ starts its sector addressing with the first available unused sector, while the others start with sector zero of the disk, making it easy for a Fortran programmer dabbling in assembler to inadvertently overwrite the bootstrap loader.
Other programming languages available on the 1130 included
There is even an ALGOL compiler, written in French, so that "Debut ...Fin;" take the place of "Begin ... End;". All its messages were in French, so "Bonne compilation" is the goal.
Eastern Michigan University developed a Fortran IV compiler for the 1130, known as Fortran-EMU, as an alternative to the Fortran IV (subset) compiler provided by IBM. It adds many features, including the LOGICAL data type, enhanced diagnostics, and six-letter variable names. The Fortran-EMU compiler was distributed as a deck of punched cards in a disk image file format with all the remaining system area deleted, to prevent copying other modules that would normally reside on the same disk, such as the assembler or compilers.
Oklahoma State University developed an ALGOL 68 compiler, written in ANSI Fortran 1966.[13][14][15]
A FOCAL interpreter was developed at the University of Michigan.
IBM also distributed a large library of programs, both IBM-supported (Type I and II) and unsupported (Type III and IV).
Since the 1130 was aimed primarily at the scientific market, scientific and engineering programs predominated:
- Scientific Subroutine Package
- Draw and Plot Subroutines
- Electric Power System Load Flow Program
- Multiple Regression
- Calculation of Electrical Distribution System Fault Currents
- Pipe Analysis
- COGO coordinate geometry
- Continuous System Modeling (CSMP)
- Linear Programming Mathematical optimization Subroutine System
- Structural Engineering System Solver (STRESS)
- Statistical System[16]
The 1130 also occupied a niche as a data processing machine for smaller organizations:
- 1130 Commercial Subroutine Package
- Student Information System
- CPM/PERT
There is also special-purpose software:
Operating procedure
The enduring memories of the IBM 1130 may have resulted from its need for continual human intervention. It was usually occupied running "jobs" specified by a deck of punched cards. The human operator would load jobs into the card reader and separate them back into jobs for return, perhaps along with printed output, to the submitter. The operator would also have to watch the 1130 for evidence of a malfunctioning or stalled job and intervene by pressing the INT REQ key on the keyboard to skip ahead to the start of the next job.[19]
Marking the start of a job was a punched card that started with // JOB
. Any card that started with //
was a command to the Supervisor and could not be used as user program or data. Other commands included // DUP
to execute the Disk Utility Program (to delete files or add the file in the temporary area to the file collection) and // XEQ
to execute a named program from disk. If a user program tried to read a command card, the standard card reader routine would signal end-of-input to the program and save that card's content for the Supervisor.
- Initial Program Load (IPL)
Unlike the IBM 360, where a booting device can be selected from the system console, an IBM 1130 can only be "booted" (IPL'd: Initial Program Load) from an external device: a card reader or a paper tape reader.[20][21]
The bootstrap procedure reads one card from the card reader. The boot card contains binary code[22] to read the contents of sector zero of the disk drive, which in turn handles the "operation complete" interrupt from the disk drive and performs additional disk reads to prepare the 1130 for the first punched-card job. The whole process takes about a second to complete.
- Recovery procedures
When the IBM 1130 is started, the Supervisor is still in memory and probably intact, as core memory retains its state without power. If the operator concludes that a user program has stalled, the Supervisor can sense a key press to abort the program and skip ahead to the next // card. The Supervisor is not protected against modification by a badly written job, a case that might require that the operator reboot the 1130. Nor was there protection against writing to disk. If the copy of the system software on disk is modified, it can be restored by reloading it from about 4000 binary-coded punched cards (approximately two boxes).
Disk organization
The IBM 2310 disk drive stored sectors of 320 words (640 bytes) plus a one-word sector address. A cylinder consisted of two tracks on the top and bottom surfaces of the 2315, or of one platter on the 1316 disk pack used in the 2311. Each disk cylinder contained eight sectors. A sector was logically divided by the monitor into sixteen disk blocks of 20 words each (40 B); the disk block was the unit of allocation for files. The system distinguished between system cartridges, which contained the monitor and utilities along with user data, and nonsystem cartridges, which contained user data only. A system cartridge contained the cartridge id and the cold-start program (bootstrap code) in sector 0 followed by a communications area and the resident monitor in sectors one and two. Sectors three through five contained the System Location Equivalence Table (SLET)—a directory of all phases of all monitor programs. Other control information filled out the first track.
The system area was followed by a fixed area containing system utilities, disk driver subroutines, IBM-supplied compilers and other control information. This area was mapped by a Fixed Location Equivalence Table (FLET) containing the file format, file name, and disk block count. The fixed area also contained the Location Equivalence Table (LET), in the same format as the FLET, mapping the following user area of the disk. The LET and FLET consisted of one entry per file on the disk giving the file's name and format information, its size in disk blocks, and its starting block number.[19]
All disk files were contiguous disk blocks, thus there was no fragmentation. A program in need of working storage could use and modify named files, but could not expand them beyond their created size. Free space started after the last named file, and might be partially occupied by a temporary file, as the assembler or a compiler might produce. If a file was to be modified, the usual process was to use // DUP
commands to delete it, which would move any subsequent files back to close the gap, and then give that name to the temporary file as the new version of the file. Rarely modified files would thus sink towards the start of the disk as new files or new versions were appended, and frequently modified files would jostle amongst each other towards the end of the disk.
Disk space was at a premium, so program source files were normally kept as decks of cards. Users having larger requirements would arrange to have a disk of their own containing the operating system but only their files and would have to replace the "pool" system disk with theirs and restart the system when their turn at being operator came. A system with a second disk drive that could be devoted entirely to some user's code and data provided a great sense of spaciousness.
Disk Utility Program (DUP)
The Disk Utility Program (DUP) provided commands for transferring programs, subroutines and data. The "// DUP" card was followed by one or more cards:[23]
- *STORE
- *STORECI
- *STOREDATA
- *STOREDATACI
- *STOREMOD (becomes a "STORE" if the item doesn't already exist)
- *DUMP
- *DUMPDATA
- *DUMPLET (or 'DUMPFLET)
- *DELETE
The operands, as was typical back then, had to be placed into fixed/assigned columns. Aside from the names of programs, subroutines or files, codes/values could be:
- UA – User Area
- FX – The fixed area (no "extents" as per the 360; just contiguous space)
- WS – Working Storage
- CD – Punched Card/Principal Input device (could be PT: Paper Tape)
- PR – Printer
Programs could be converted to a more ready-to-use format with the STORECI command, which invoked Core Image Builder (DM2's counterpart to the 360's Linkage Editor). Alternatively, a program could go through this process each time it was to be run, and for infrequently used programs this was preferred in order to conserve disk space.
Peripheral devices
Disk memory was used to store the operating system, object code, and data, but source code was kept on punched cards.
The basic 1130 came with an IBM 2310 voice-coil actuated disk drive, called "Ramkit", from IBM's General Products Division in San Jose.[4]:497 Their pizza-box-sized IBM 2315 single platter cartridges held 512,000 words or 1,024,000 bytes (less than a 3.5" HD floppy's 1.44MB or even the 5.25" HD floppy's 1.2MB).
The console typewriter used an IBM Selectric mechanism, which meant one could change the type by replacing a hollow, golf-ball sized type element. There was a special type element available for APL, a powerful array-oriented programming language using a special symbolic notation. A row of 16 toggle switches on the console typewriter could be individually tested from within programs, using the special Fortran statement IF (SENSE SWITCH i)
, for example.
Other available peripherals included:
- Printers – the IBM 1132[24] and IBM 1403[25][26] line printers
- Punched-card – the IBM 1442 card reader/punch and the IBM 2501 card reader
- Paper tape – the IBM 1055 paper tape punch, the IBM 1054 paper tape reader, and the IBM 1134 paper tape reader
- Disk – the IBM 2311 Disk Drive
- Magnetic tape – From 1968, IBM 2415 Magnetic tape data storage drives were available as an RPQ.[27]
- Graphics – IBM 2250 Graphic Display Unit.
- Color Pen Plotter – IBM 1627 drum plotter.
- Optical Mark Reader – IBM 1231 Optical Mark Page Reader [28]
- Communications – Synchronous Communications Adapter (SCA). The IBM 1130 MTCA, for Multiple Terminal Control Adapter, announced in 1970[29] allowed up to four 2741 terminals to be connected to an IBM 1130, for use with APL.
To simplify the design of peripheral devices, these relied on the processor. The card reader had no memory buffers, but instead gave the CPU a level-zero (highest priority) interrupt after each individual column of the card had been read. If the CPU did not respond and store the twelve bits of data before another such interrupt indicated that the next column had been read, data would be lost. Similarly, the 1132 printer relied on software on the 1130. When a letter such as A
came into position, the CPU had to analyze a buffered line of text and assemble an array of bits that would indicate to the 1132 which print positions should be printed with A
. If the CPU could not respond before the A
rotated out of position, print speed would be severely degraded.
Other peripherals accepted text in a device-specific code convenient for its hardware. The CPU had to translate it to or from the EBCDIC code in which the CPU processed the text.
Instruction set overview
Instructions had short (one-word) and long (two-word) formats. Most computational, load, and store instructions referenced one register (usually ACC) and a memory location. The memory location was identified, in the short format, by an 8-bit signed displacement from either the current address or one of the index registers; or in the long format, by a full 15-bit address, which could be indexed and specify indirection. Memory was addressed in units of words.
The 1130 supported only single-precision and double-precision binary data natively (16 and 32 bits) stored in big-endian format. Standard- and extended-precision floating-point (32 and 48 bits) and decimal data were supported through the use of subroutines.
Conditional transfers were based on (a) the current contents of the accumulator, or (b) the carry and overflow indicators set by a preceding operation. Transfers could be by skip (which assumed that the next instruction was short) or by branch. A skip occurred if any of the specified tests were true. A branch occurred if none of the specified tests were true.
Main Registers: IAR = Instruction Address Register ACC = Accumulator EXT = Extension Register XRx = Index Registers: x = 1,2,3 Implemented as memory words 1,2,3, not as hardware registers. Condition tests: Z Accumulator zero - Accumulator negative + Accumulator positive E Accumulator even C Carry indicator off O Overflow indicator off 1130 Instruction Set Mnemonics: LD = Load ACC STO = Store ACC LDD = Load Double (ACC & EXT) STD = Store Double (ACC & EXT) LDX = Load Index STX = Store Index LDS = Load Status STS = Store Status A = Add ACC AD = Add Double S = Subtract ACC SD = Subtract Double M = Multiply D = Divide AND = Boolean AND OR = Boolean OR XOR = Boolean Exclusive OR SLA = Shift Left ACC SLT = Shift Left ACC & EXT SLCA = Shift Left and Count ACC SLC = Shift Left and Count ACC & EXT SRA = Shift Right ACC SRT = Shift Right ACC & EXT RTE = Rotate Right ACC & EXT BSC = Branch or Skip on Condition (Modifier dependent) i.e. BP BNP BN BNN BZ BNZ BC BO BOD BOSC - Branch Out or Skip Conditionally (alternate for BSC with bit 9 set) Exits current interrupt level. BSI = Branch and Store IAR MDX = Modify Index and Skip (Increment IAR one if a sign change or becomes zero) WAIT = Halt NOP = No Operation (alternate for SLA 0) XIO = Execute I/O 1800 Additional Instruction Mnemonics: CMP = Compare ACC DCM = Double Compare ACC & EXT Equivalent Mnemonics The disk assembler introduced several mnemonics equivalent to existing instructions intended to make the programmer's intent clearer: SKP - Skip on condition, equivalent to a short BSC B - Branch unconditionally, equivalent to BSC with no conditions specified BP - Branch Accumulator Positive, equivalent to BSC specifying '+' condition BNP - Branch Accumulator not Positive BN - Branch Accumulator Negative BNN - Branch Accumulator not Negative BZ - Branch Accumulator Zero BNZ - Branch Accumulator not Zero BC - Branch on Carry BO - Branch on Overflow BOD - Branch Accumulator Odd MDM - Modify Memory, equivalent to unindexed long-format MDX XCH - Exchange Accumulator and Extension, equivalent to RTE 16 Short instruction format (one 16 bit word): 1 Bits 0...45678......5 OP---FTTDisp---- OP is Operation F is format 0 = Short TT is Tag Disp is Displacement Long instruction format (two 16 bit words): 1 1 Bits 0...456789.....50..............5 OP---FTTIMod----Address--------- OP is Operation F is format 1 = Long TT is Tag I is Indirect bit Mod is Modifier Effective Address Calculation (EA): F = 0 | F = 1, I = 0 | F = 1, I = 1 Direct Addressing| Direct Addressing| Indirect Addressing ------------------------------------------------------------------- TT = 00 | EA = Displ + IAR | EA = Add | EA = C/Add TT = 01 | EA = Displ + XR1 | EA = Add + XR1 | EA = C/Add + XR1 TT = 10 | EA = Displ + XR2 | EA = Add + XR2 | EA = C/Add + XR2 TT = 11 | EA = Displ + XR3 | EA = Add + XR3 | EA = C/Add + XR3 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Disp = Contents of displacement field Add = Contents of address field of instruction C = Contents of location specified by Add or Add + XR
- Reserved memory
The lowest addresses of core memory had uses dictated either by the hardware or by convention:
Address | Usage |
---|---|
/0000 | By convention, contained the instruction B *-1 , which would branch to itself indefinitely until an operator noticed that all the console IAR lights were dark and flushed the job, either by pressing Int Req or by rebooting. |
/0001 | XR1. The memory addresses of the index registers permitted direct moves between them, such as with LDX I1 2 |
/0002 | XR2. |
/0003 | XR3. |
/0008 | The address of the handler for the Level 0 (highest priority) interrupt— 1442 card reader/punch "column ready" interrupt. |
/0009 | The address of the handler for the Level 1 interrupt— 1132 printer and Synchronous Communications Adapter. Handlers for this and lower interrupts would have to test a Status Word to determine which device had interrupted. |
/000A=10 | The address of the handler for the Level 2 interrupt— disk storage, Storage Access Channel. |
/000B=11 | The address of the handler for the Level 3 interrupt— 1627 plotter, Storage Access Channel. |
/000C=12 | The address of the handler for the Level 4 interrupt— 1134 paper tape reader, 1055 paper tape punch, console, 1442 card read punch, 2501 card reader, 1403 printer, 1231 optical mark reader, Storage Access Channel device. |
/000D=13 | The address of the handler for the Level 5 (lowest priority) interrupt— console stop and interrupt switches, Storage Access Channel. |
/0020=32 | First word of the scan field for the 1132 printer (/0020–/0027). |
/0026=38 | Last full word of the scan field. |
/0027=39 | Half used: 120 columns = 120 bits = seven 16-bit words plus 8 bits. |
/0038=56 | EXIT to Supervisor/Return to Monitor (CALL EXIT) |
Programming
Subprograms
The 1130 has no hardware support for a stack. Most subprograms are called with the instruction BSI (Branch and Store IAR). This deposits the value of IAR (the return address) at the destination address and transfers control to destination+1. Subprograms return to wherever they were called on that occasion using an indirect branch through that first word of the subprogram. Placing the return address in-line was a common technique of computers at that time, such as the Hewlett-Packard HP 2100[30] and the Scientific Data Systems SDS 920.[31]
So a subprogram named SIMPL might be organized as follows (comments follow the instruction operand):
SIMPL: DC *-* This is the entry point, filled with a zero initially. (whatever the routine does) B I SIMPL Return by an Indirect branch, to the address found in location SIMPL. END SIMPL Instructs the assembler that the source for routine SIMPLE is complete.
The subprogram would be called as follows:
BSI L SIMPL Call SIMPL. L (Long) is needed if SIMPL is more than -128 or +127 words away.
The pseudo-operation CALL would typically be used.
As shown, a subprogram's entry point is DC *-*
, an assembler pseudo operation that is used to Define a Constant (occupying one word of storage) with the value specified by the expression. The * stands for the current address of the assembly and so *-* results in zero. Writing this rather than 0 provides a visually distinctive note that a meaningful value (the return address) will be placed there at run time. The entry point need not be the first word of the subprogram. Indeed, the preceding word can be the start of a two-word direct branch instruction whose address field is at SIMPL. Then, returns can be effected by one-word branches there: B SIMPL-1
When SIMPL is called, the BSI instruction replaces *-*
with the current value of IAR, which is the address just past the BSI instruction. After SIMPL does whatever it is written to do, B I SIMPL
branches not to SIMPL, but indirect through it, thus continuing execution with the instruction following the BSI instruction that called SIMPL.
Without extra arrangements to protect the return address, recursion is impossible: If SIMPL calls itself, or called a subprogram that called it, its original return address is overwritten. Re-entrancy is problematic for the same reason: An interrupt service routine must refrain from calling any subprogram that might have been the code that was interrupted.
The caller of SIMPL might pass it parameters, which might be values or addresses of values. Parameters might be coded in-line (immediately following the BSI instruction) or might be placed in index registers XR1 and XR2. If parameters are placed in-line, SIMPL modifies its own return address so its final indirect branch returns beyond the parameters.
Integer functions of a single integer expect the parameter in the accumulator and return their result there. Floating-point functions employ the floating-point accumulator (a two word area set aside by the floating-point library, three words for extended precision), and so on.
The convention of coding 0 as the initial value at the entry point means that if a programming error leads to SIMPL returning before the first time it was ever called, execution would jump to memory location 0. As mentioned above, it is customary to have location 0 contain a branch to location 0. The 1130 would be stuck at location 0, and the IAR lights on the console would be entirely dark, making it clear the program had failed.
Linkage to library routines
For subprograms that would be called many times (for example, subprograms for floating-point arithmetic), it is important to reduce the size of each call to one word. Such "library routines" use the LIBF protocol. It is more complex than the CALL protocol described in the previous section, but LIBF hides the complexity from the writer of the assembly-language program.
Library routines are addressed through index register XR3. (Fortran subprograms use index register XR1 for the addresses of parameters and the return address, but register XR2 is unused.) XR3 points to a sequence of three-word transfer vectors such that the first entry is -128 words from XR3's value. The programmer calls the library routine using the LIBF
pseudo-operation, which assembles not a direct BSI
to the routine but a one-word indexed branch instruction (BSI 3 disp
) whose displacement (-128, -125, and so on) identifies the start of the routine's transfer vector.
The transfer vector is prepared by the linkage loader when it puts together the program. A transfer vector entry to a library function named SIMPL takes this form:
DC *-* A word into which BSI stores the return address. B L SIMPL Branch to the start of the library function.
The way SIMPL knew where its return address was is that, if SIMPL were declared a LIBF routine, the linkage loader would modify the code of SIMPL, placing the address of SIMPL's transfer vector entry at SIMPL+2. LIBF routines, unlike CALL subprograms, do not start with a DC directive to hold the return address (it is in the transfer vector) but with actual code, as follows:
SIMPL STX 1 RCVR1+1 Save the caller's value of XR1 at a nearby location. LDX I1 *-* The linkage loader changes the address word to point to the transfer vector.
Placing the address of SIMPL's transfer vector at SIMPL+2 leaves room for a one-word instruction to save the chosen index register, here XR1. Then the indirect LDX instruction points XR1 not at the transfer vector, but through it to the return address, or to any parameters stored in-line after the BSI. SIMPL then does whatever it was written to do, gaining access to any in-line parameters through XR1 (in which case it must increment XR1 for the return address), and returns as follows:
STX 1 RETN+1 Store XR1 to prepare to use it as a return address. RCVR1 LDX L1 *-* SIMPL's first instruction modified this address. Now, * restore the original value of XR1. RETN B L *-* This instruction was modified two instructions ago; return.
- Example
Suppose a LIBF-style call to SIMPL were at address 100. Then the return address would be 101, because BSI 3 disp
is a one-word instruction. XR3 points into the group of transfer vectors. If the transfer vector for SIMPL started at address 2000, then the BSI would be assembled with a disp
so that XR3+disp = 2000. Executing the BSI stores 101 at location 2000 and jumps to location 2001. At 2001 is a two-word long jump to the entry point of SIMPL, which the linkage loader might have placed at address 300.
The long jump transfers control to SIMPL. After the instruction at 300 stores XR1, the instruction at 301 is LDX I1 2000
, the linkage loader having placed 2000 at location 302. This does not load 2000 into XR1; it is an indirect instruction, and loads the contents of 2000, which is 101, the return address for that call to SIMPL.
In the return sequence shown above, by the time control reaches RETN, the instruction there is B L 101
, which returns to the caller. (If there is one or more in-line parameters at 101, SIMPL would increment XR1 to point to 102 or beyond, and this would be the destination of the B
instruction.)
- Variations
If SIMPL took parameters coded in-line following the BSI instruction, SIMPL gains access to them with indexed addressing off XR1. The first could be obtained by LD 1 0
, the second by LD 1 1
, and so on. If the second parameter is the address of the actual parameter, then LD I1 1
obtains its value. Before returning, SIMPL increments XR1 past the n parameters with an instruction such as MDX 1 n
so as to place the right value at RETN+1.
A LIBF routine that declined to restore the original value of XR1 could omit the above steps and return with a simple B 1 n
to skip n in-line parameters. However, such a routine can not be called by other LIBF routines because it disrupts the caller's use of XR1 for access to its own parameters and return address.
The complexity of LIBF saves memory for subprograms that are frequently called.:[32]:p.24 The LIBF linkage requires one word per invocation, plus three words for the transfer vector entry and extra code in the routine itself, whereas the CALL linkage requires two words per invocation because most CALLs will be to an address beyond the -128 to +127 word reach of the one-word opcode.
The register XR3 must point to the transfer vector entries for the library routines rather than a dispatch table of only their addresses, because this latter would require that LIBF routines be called with an indirect BSI instruction. These instructions are two words long, so such a design would negate the code size savings of LIBF. The eight-bit limit for the disp field of the one-word instruction code limits usage of LIBF routines to no more than 85 distinct entries.
Code modification
The previous sections show that code and data are intermingled. It is common in 1130 programming to modify the address fields of instructions and, in fact, to modify entire instructions.
By the Fortran compiler
The Fortran compiler produces self-modifying code when generating code for any subprograms (subroutines or functions) that have parameters. The compiler builds a table of every location where the subprogram references one of its parameters, and compiles as the first instruction in the body of the subprogram a call to a subprogram called SUBIN that uses the table to modify the address field of every reference to a parameter to be the actual address of the parameter during the current invocation. SUBIN makes these patches every time the subprogram is called.
When a Fortran program calls a subprogram, the addresses of any parameters appear in-line following the call. For example, the Fortran statement CALL SIMPL(X) might compile into:
BSI L SIMPL DC X The address of X, on which SIMPL is to operate
Within the subprogram, parameters could be accessed by indirect indexed addressing as shown above in Variations, so, given that XR1 has been suitably prepared, an integer parameter could be loaded into the accumulator with an instruction like this:
LD I1 0 Load the value of the first parameter (offset 0) into the accumulator
The compiler instead used direct addressing. When SUBIN runs, it obtains the address of X and patches the instruction's address field to become:
LD L X Load the value of X into the accumulator
The advantages of SUBIN are as follows:
- To obtain the operand's address an indirect indexed instruction requires three memory cycles (the index register being in memory) while the direct access instruction require only one.
- If SIMPL were to pass one of its parameters to any subprogram that expected to receive the address of its parameter (including all the LIBF routines for floating-point arithmetic), SUBIN is needed to supply the actual address of the original parameter.
The disadvantages of SUBIN are the time it requires to run and the memory required for the table of references. The size of this table is the sum of 5, the number of parameters, and the number of references; if this sum exceeds 511, compilation will fail. For subprograms with many references to a parameter, the author of the subprogram might copy the parameter into a local variable.
By the user
Modifying entire instructions was a common technique at the time. For example, although the 1130 has an OR instruction, the syntax of Fortran provides no way to write it. An integer function IOR can be defined, enabling logical OR to be part of a Fortran expression such as:
M = 3*IOR(I,J) + 5
The Fortran compiler places the addresses of I and J in-line and expects the result in the accumulator. Using IOR(I,J) in a Fortran expression compiles the following four words:
BSI L IOR Two-word jump to the start of the IOR function. DC I A one-word in-line parameter: The address of I. DC J A one-word in-line parameter: The address of J.
In fact, the assembler IOR function does not compute I or J at all. Instead, it replaces the above four words with the following:
LD L I Load accumulator with I (two-word instruction) OR L J OR accumulator with J (two-word instruction)
After performing that transformation, it does not return past the end of the four-word block (which it had just modified). Instead, it branches to the exact address from which it had been called originally. The BSI instruction is no longer there; what is now there is the two instructions it has just written. They combine the two integers with the machine-language OR instruction and leave the result in the accumulator, as required.
The call to IOR and the transformation of the four-word block happens at most once per program run. If the Fortran line illustrated above is executed again, it runs faster than it did the first time. Similar functions could be devised for other useful operations.
A function that self-modifies, as IOR does, can not be used in a Fortran subprogram on any of the parameters to that subprogram (though it could be used to combine local variables) because it is incompatible with the SUBIN subprogram discussed above. IOR's transformation of its four-word calling sequence, shown above, moves the location of the address of variable I. On subsequent calls to the Fortran subprogram, the table of references to parameters would be in error and SUBIN would patch the wrong word, in this case placing the new address of I over the OR operation code.
Extended precision
1130 FORTRAN offered two floating point formats: a 32-bit "standard precision" format and a 40-bit "extended precision" format.
Standard precision format contains a 24-bit two's complement significand while extended precision utilizes a 32-bit two's complement significand. The latter format makes full use of the cpu's 32-bit integer operations. The characteristic in both formats is an 8-bit field containing the power of two biased by 128. Floating-point arithmetic operations are performed by software, and double precision is not supported at all. The extended format occupies three 16-bit words, with the extra space simply ignored.[33]
The "*EXTENDED PRECISION" compiler option card tells the FORTRAN compiler to use 40 bits instead of 32 bits for Floating Point data.
Large Fortran programs
Data to be manipulated and the instructions that manipulate them have to reside together in core memory. The amount of installed memory (from 4,096 to 32,768 words) is a key limitation. Fortran provides several techniques to write large programs despite this limitation.
- LOCAL subprograms
Fortran let any subprogram be designated as "LOCAL" (Load-on-Call). Each LOCAL subprogram is an overlay; it is part of the disk-resident executable program but is only loaded into core memory (if not already there) during the time it is called. So, for example, six LOCAL subprograms would require only as much core memory as the largest, rather than the total amount for all six. However, none of the six can invoke another, either directly or through intermediary subprograms.
- Programs in phases
An entire Fortran program can pass control to a subsequent phase, exiting to the Supervisor with an instruction to load the follow-on phase into core memory. A large program might be split into three parts, separately compiled, called PART1, PART2, and PART3. Execution is started by // XEQ PART1
and at a suitable point, PART1 would execute the Fortran statement CALL LINK(PART2)
and so forth. The name of the successor program in the CALL can not be variable, but program logic can govern whether control is transferred to another phase, and which CALL LINK
statement is executed. As mentioned above, the Fortran compiler itself was written this way, with each phase of compilation achieved by a separate program.
- COMMON data storage
Programs, such as Fortran programs, reside at low core memory addresses (just above the Supervisor). Fortran allocates space at the highest addresses for any variables and arrays declared COMMON. If a follow-on phase of the program contains a corresponding COMMON declaration, then information in this common area can be shared among phases. Phases could omit the COMMON declaration without problem, provided those phases were not so large as to have their program code invade the common area. COMMON storage not only shares data between phases; lower-memory COMMON variables can be used to pass data among a main program and subprograms within a single phase, though the data could be lost on moving to the next phase.
Programming examples
The examples can be executed on the IBM 1130 emulator available at IBM 1130.org.
Sample assembler program deck
The following listing shows a card deck that compiles and runs an assembler program that lists a deck of cards to the line printer.
// JOB // ASM *LIST * LCARD.ASM - LIST A DECK OF CARDS TO LINE PRINTER * * PROGRAM * NEW PAGE ON PRINTER * A READ A CARD * CONVERT FORMAT * PRINT A LINE ON PRINTER * GOTO A * START LIBF PRNT1 GOTO NEW PAGE ON 1132 DC /3100 PRINTER CHANNEL 1-NEW PAGE * NEXTC LIBF CARD0 READ FROM 1442 CARD READER DC /1000 CONTROL TO READ DC CBUFF STORE 80 COLUMNS CINP LIBF CARD0 DC 0 B CINP LOOP UNTIL CARD IS READ * LIBF ZIPCO CONVERT CARD TO PRINTER DC /1100 UNPACKED IN, PACKED OUT DC CBUFF+1 INPUT BUFFER DC PBUFF+1 OUTPUT BUFFER DC 80 CHARACTER COUNT CALL HLEBC HOLLERITH TO EBCDIC * LIBF PRNT1 PRINT 80 CHARACTERS DC /2000 CONTROL CODE TO PRINT DC PBUFF PRINT BUFFER DC PERR PRINT ERROR POUT LIBF PRNT1 CHECK FOR PRINT COMPLETE DC 0 B POUT LOOP UNTIL COMPLETE * B NEXTC READ NEXT CARD * * DATA * CBUFF DC 80 80 COLUMNS PER CARD BSS 80 * PBUFF DC 40 40 WORDS 80 CHARACTERS BSS 40 * PERR DC 0 B I PERR THIS RETURNS TO THE * PRINTER ERROR HANDLER * WHICH WILL TERMINATE THE PROGRAM * END START PROGRAM ENTRY POINT // XEQ TEST DATA 1 HELLO WORLD TEST DATA 2
In this job, the assembler leaves the result of its assembly in the temporary area of the system disk, and the XEQ command executes the content of the temporary area. The odd-looking END START
has two meanings: end of assembler source, and the name of the entry point of the routine, which has the label START.
Assembler source starts with column 21 of the card, not column one. In systems without a disk drive, the assembler would punch code into the start of the card just read (the card reader was actually a reader-punch, with the punch station after the read station) and then read the next card. To handle forward branches and the like, the assembler's second pass literally involved a second pass of the cards through the reader/punch. If source changes were needed the programmer would duplicate the cards to obtain a deck with columns 1-20 blank ready for the next run through the assembler.
By convention, buffers are preceded by a word count. The DC
(Define Constant) assembles a count word and the following BSS
(Block Started by Symbol) reserves the required number of words for the buffer. The card buffer requires 80 words, one for each card column. Driver CARD0 reads each card column literally, using 12 of the 16 bits in the buffer word, with a bit set to on for each hole punched in the corresponding row for that column. The pattern of punches typically describes a text character using the Hollerith code. The console keyboard also gives input to the program in the Hollerith code, the only case of two devices using the same character encoding.
The printer routine, however, works with text in 8-bit EBCDIC with two characters per word, requiring a 40-word buffer. The program uses library routine ZIPCO to perform the conversion. Despite appearances, the statement CALL HLEBC
is not executed because HLEBC is not a subroutine but an IBM-supplied Hollerith-to-EBCDIC conversion table. The CALL statement provides the address of the table to ZIPCO and ensures that the linking loader includes the table in the program, thus it is the fifth parameter to ZIPCO, though one occupying two words of storage: the BSI operation code word for the CALL is unused and thus usually wasted, but the second word of the expansion of CALL HLEBC
is the address of the HLEBC table needed by ZIPCO. After the conversion, the program sends the converted output, now in buffer PBUFF, to the printer through driver PRNT1. Again, the program loops until the printer driver reports completion, then the program reads the next card.
This example contains no code to decide when to stop. A more complete program would check for cards that begin with //
, which denotes the start of the next job. To stop the card reader as soon as possible, a program could check for the Hollerith code of /
before even converting the card to EBCDIC.
Asynchronous I/O and performance
The call to CARD0 to read a card initiates that operation and immediately returns to the caller, which could proceed with other activity. However, the example program makes no attempt to overlap input and output using buffers even though it has two separate work areas; it simply loops back to CIMP to test afresh. After CARD0 has sensed the card reader's operation-complete interrupt, it returns one word further on, thus skipping the jump back to CIMP and leaving the loop.
The example routines do not run the I/O devices at top speed. Notably, the card reader, only a few milliseconds after reporting completion on reading a card, will commence its stop sequence, after which a new read command will have to wait to initiate another read cycle. The IBM 1442 reader could read 400 cards/minute at full speed, but just a little hesitancy in the read commands would halve its throughput or worse. A Fortran program could not complete even the simplest input processing in time, and so could not read cards at full speed. One common Fortran DO
loop to read cards made the motor stop and start so frequently as to accelerate wear. With buffering, the card reader control could be overlapped with processing, and the reader could be run at full speed through large data decks, but memory for the more complex program and for buffers was often at a premium.
Even with assembler and double buffering, a program to list a deck of cards from the IBM 2501 reader (1,000 cards/minute) on the line printer could not keep up, as the translation from card hole patterns to EBCDIC for the printer as done by EBPRT was too slow; the more complex ZIPCO and HLEBC were needed instead, as in the example.
Sample Fortran IV program deck
The following listing shows a card deck that compiles and runs a Fortran program and Fortran subroutine for the IBM 1130 when running DM2.
// JOB
// FOR
*LIST SOURCE PROGRAM
*ONE WORD INTEGERS
C-------------------------------------------------------
C COMPUTE THE CRITICAL VALUES FOR A QUADRATIC EQN
C 0=A*X**2+B*X+C
C RETURNS DISCRIMINANT, ROOTS, VERTEX, FOCAL LENGTH, FOCAL POINT
C X1 AND X2 ARE THE ROOTS
C-------------------------------------------------------
SUBROUTINE QUADR(A,B,C,DISCR,X1,X2,VX,VY,FL,FPY)
REAL A,B,C,DISCR,X1,X2,VX,VY,FL,FPY
C DISCRIMINANT, VERTEX, FOCAL LENGTH, FOCAL POINT Y
DISCR = B**2.0 - 4.0*A*C
VX = -B / (2.0*A)
VY = A*VX**2.0 + B*VX + C
FL = 1.0 / (A * 4.0)
FPY = VY + FL
FL = ABS(FL)
C COMPUTE THE ROOTS BASED ON THE DISCRIMINANT
IF(DISCR) 110,120,130
C -VE DISCRIMINANT, TWO COMPLEX ROOTS, REAL=X1, IMG=+/-X2
110 X1 = -B / (2.0*A)
X2 = SQRT(-DISCR) / (2.0*A)
RETURN
C ZERO DISCRIMINANT, ONE REAL ROOT
120 X1 = -B / (2.0*A)
X2 = X1
RETURN
C +VE DISCRIMINANT, TWO REAL ROOTS
130 X1 = (-B + SQRT(DISCR)) / (2.0*A)
X2 = (-B - SQRT(DISCR)) / (2.0*A)
RETURN
C
C NEXT STORE SUBROUTINE ON DISK USING DUP
END
// DUP
*DELETE QUADR
*STORE WS UA QUADR
// JOB
// FOR
*LIST SOURCE PROGRAM
*IOCS(CARD,1132 PRINTER)
*ONE WORD INTEGERS
C-------------------------------------------------------
C PROCESS DATA CARDS WITH A,B,C
C UNTIL A=0
C-------------------------------------------------------
DATA ICARD,IPRT /2,3/
REAL A,B,C
REAL DISCR,XR1,XR2,VX,VY,FL,FPY
WRITE(IPRT,901)
901 FORMAT(' ------------------------------------------------------')
C READ A B C, IF A=0 THEN EXIT
100 READ(ICARD,801)A,B,C
801 FORMAT(3F8.3)
C EXIT WHEN A IS ZERO
IF (A) 110,9000,110
C PRINT A B C
110 WRITE(IPRT,902)A,B,C
902 FORMAT(' QUADRATIC A=',F8.3,' B=',F8.3,' C=',F8.3)
C COMPUTE AND PRINT THE CRITICAL VALUES
CALL QUADR(A,B,C,DISCR,XR1,XR2,VX,VY,FL,FPY)
WRITE(IPRT,903) DISCR
903 FORMAT(' DISCRIMINANT=',F9.4)
WRITE(IPRT,904) VX,VY
904 FORMAT(' VERTEX X=',F9.4,' Y=',F9.4)
WRITE(IPRT,905) FL
905 FORMAT(' FOCAL LENGTH=',F9.4)
WRITE(IPRT,906) VX,FPY
906 FORMAT(' FOCAL POINT X=',F9.4,' Y='F9.4)
IF (DISCR) 120,130,140
C -VE DISCRIMINANT, TWO COMPLEX ROOTS
120 WRITE(IPRT,913) XR1, XR2
913 FORMAT(' COMPLEX ROOTS =(',F9.4,' +/-',F9.4,'I)')
GO TO 200
C ZERO DISCRIMINANT, ONE REAL ROOT
130 WRITE(IPRT,912) XR1
912 FORMAT(' ROOT X =',F9.4)
GO TO 200
C +VE DISCRIMINANT, TWO REAL ROOTS
140 WRITE(IPRT,911) XR1, XR2
911 FORMAT(' ROOTS X1=',F9.4,' X2=',F9.4)
C --- GO TO 200
C END OF QUAD
200 WRITE(IPRT,901)
GO TO 100
C END OF PROGRAM
C DATA FOLLOWS XEQ CARD
9000 CALL EXIT
END
// XEQ
+001.000+000.000+000.000
+001.000+002.000+003.000
+002.000+002.000+000.000
+002.000+000.000-004.000
+000.500+000.000-004.000
+000.250+002.000-002.000
-004.000+000.000-004.000
+002.730-007.200-003.750
+000.000+000.000+000.000
Sample APL\1130 session
The following image shows a simple APL \ 1130 session. This session was performed via the 1130 simulator available from IBM 1130.org
The above session shows a signon, addition of the integers 1 to 100, generation of an addition table for the integers 1..5 and a sign off.
Competing systems
In the same year as the 1130's introduction, Digital Equipment Corporation introduced the smaller, cheaper, and better-selling 12-bit PDP-8, recognized as the first successful minicomputer.
Influence of the 1130
- Brian Utley was the 1130s Project Manager during its development and introduction. Brian said at the third 11/30 party that before IBM Marketing named the 1130 it was known as the Small Engineering Computer System or SECS.[34] The initial architecture was 18 bits but was changed to 16 bits due to the influence of the System/360 development. The full dialogue of his 2005 presentation is available at IBM1130.org.
- Notable software designer Grady Booch got his first exposure to programming on an IBM 1130:[35]
... I pounded the doors at the local IBM sales office until a salesman took pity on me. After we chatted for a while, he handed me a Fortran [manual]. I'm sure he gave it to me thinking, "I'll never hear from this kid again." I returned the following week saying, "This is really cool. I've read the whole thing and have written a small program. Where can I find a computer?" The fellow, to my delight, found me programming time on an IBM 1130 on weekends and late-evening hours. That was my first programming experience, and I must thank that anonymous IBM salesman for launching my career. Thank you, IBM.
- LISP guru Guy Steele wrote a LISP interpreter for the IBM 1130 when he was in high school (Boston Latin School, which had an IBM 1130 for student use).[36][37] His code and documentation for LISP 1.6, along with a summary of current work in getting it to run under simulation, is available at IBM1130.org.
- Chuck Moore wanted to call his new language "Fourth" but the IBM 1130 operating system was limited to five-character names, so it wound up being called FORTH.[38]
- Dan Bricklin, creator of the VisiCalc program, got his start in programming when he learned and used the IBM 1130 as part of the National Science Foundation Computer/Math Summer Project for high school students, given at the University of Pennsylvania in 1966.[39]
- An IBM 1130 with 8 kilowords of core was used for the world's first full-time Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence research at The Ohio State University Radio Observatory.[40]
- Charles Goldfarb, the father of SGML, describes a job installing a typesetting system based on an IBM 1130 that "eventually changed my career", driving him towards generic markup:[41]
The system was an IBM 1130 computer, a machine the size of a desk with 8 KB of main memory, a 512 KB disk drive, a Teletype CX paper tape reader and BRPE paper tape punch, and a Photon 713 photomechanical typesetter. The assignment was my first experience with managing a machine-readable document database: I learned to roll the punched paper tape carefully so that it could be stored neatly in cylindrical waste paper baskets.
In the meantime, though I didn't know about it, the roots of generalized markup were being planted. Historically, electronic manuscripts contained control codes or macros that caused the document to be formatted in a particular way ("specific coding"). In contrast, generic coding, which began in the late 1960s, uses descriptive tags (for example, "heading", rather than "format-17").
- Alan Kay used the IBM 1130 in early GUI work for his Ph.D. thesis in 1969.[42]
- Hutchinson Central Technical High School ("Hutch Tech") in Buffalo, NY used the IBM 1130 in the nation's first four-year high school computer science curriculum in 1969. Robert Santuci was the computer science program head and taught classes in programming and inductive logic.[43]
- An engineer from IBM was hired by Signetics and incorporated a number of architectural features from the IBM 1130 into the Signetics 2650 single-chip processor.[44]
1130s today
Out of an estimated 10,000 systems produced, the following are known to exist as of 2021:
- ACONIT in Grenoble, France has a complete 1130 system.[45]
- The Computer History Museum (Mountain View, California) has an 1130 system.[46]
- COSECANS (Basel, Switzerland).[47]
- The National Museum of Computing (TNMOC) (Bletchley Park, United Kingdom) has a complete 1130 system.[48][49]
- The University of Stuttgart (Germany) has a functional 1130 system.[50]
- Carl Claunch is currently restoring an 1130 system.[51]
Apocrypha
Speculation on why the product was given the number 1130 centered on the following possibilities:
- That, since the 1130 was a small scientific machine, the number was chosen by multiplying 360 (as in IBM 360) by π.
- That 11:30 was the time of day that product planners reached an impasse regarding what to call the product.
- That the 1130 was IBM's 11th Computer Design, and it had 30 instructions.
Others have speculated that the existence of the IBM 1130 explains why no computer designated "11/30" ever appeared in the PDP-11 family of machines.[52]
See also
References
- Francis, C.G. (11 February 1965). "IBM introduces powerful small computer". Director of Information (Press release). White Plains, New York: International Business Machines (IBM). Archived from the original on 2019-07-05.
- Utley, Brian (Jan 2005). "Guest speaker: Brian Utley" (MP3) (Interview). Retrieved 2012-01-02.
- 760 lb: models 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 4A and 4B
1050 lb: models 1C, 1D, 2C, 2D, 3B, 3C, 3D, 5B, 5C and 5D- "IBM 1130 documents". www.bitsavers.org. fe/GA26-5914-8_1130_Installation_Manual_Physical_Planning_Dec71.pdf, pp. 10-11.
- Emerson W. Pugh; Lyle R. Johnson; John H. Palmer (1991). IBM's 360 and early 370 systems. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-16123-7.
- "New Xerox minicomputer". The New York Times. January 29, 1973.
- "Xerox 530 supports COBOL". ComputerWorld. December 26, 1973.
- "Rank Xerox 530 Computer" (PDF). computerhistory.org. Retrieved Sep 23, 2014.
- "Xerox 530 orders "encouraging"".
- Larry Breed (August 2006). "How We Got To APL\1130". Vector (British APL Association). 22 (3). ISSN 0955-1433. Archived from the original on 2008-05-12. Retrieved 2007-03-11.
- for which there was an IBM compiler
- SL/1: references to Student Language/One, Student Language/1 and Subset Language/1 exist
- an IBM Program Product
- Hedrick, G.E.; Robertson, Alan, "The Oklahoma State ALGOL 68 Subset Compiler". 1975 International Conference on ALGOL 68. Stillwater, OK, June 10–12, 1975.
- Hedrick, G. E., "ALGOL68 instruction at Oklahoma State University", ACM SIGCSE Bulletin – Special issue eighth technical symposium on computer science education Homepage, Volume 9 Issue 3, Aug 1977, ACM New York, NY, USA
- McJones, Paul, "Algol 68 implementations and dialects", Software Preservation Group, Computer History Museum
- IBM Corporation (1967). 1130 Statistical System (1130-CA-06X) User's Manual (PDF). Retrieved Feb 8, 2015.
- IBM Corporation (1968). IBM 1130 Remote Job Entry Work Station Program Program Logic Manual (PDF). Retrieved Feb 8, 2015.
- IBM Corporation (1967). IBM 1130 Typesetting System (RPQ) (PDF). Retrieved Feb 8, 2015.
- IBM Corporation (May 1972). IBM 1130 Disk Monitor System, Version 2, Programmer's and Operator's Guide (PDF). Retrieved Feb 6, 2015.
- "This artifact". Retrieved 2017-02-21.
- Quote: "Our 1130 has a 2315, 1/2 million-word disk cartridge unit on the right side, behind the door. The paper tape reader was probably primarily used for booting, instead of the large, 300 cards/min 1442 card reader."
- Systems Reference Library IBM 1130 Functional Characteristics (PDF). Page 136 of the Functional Characteristics, Figure 40, shows how each of the 12 holes on a punched card fill the 16 bits of a memory word, when doing an IPL (Initial Program Load), using "Load Mode Read."
- "Monitor Programs".
- Model 1 @ 80 Lines/minute, Model 2 @ 40 LPM
- choice of 340 Lines/minute Model 6, 600 LPM Model 7
- "Systems Reference Library IBM 1130 Operating Procedures" (PDF). BitSavers.
- IBM 1130 Custom Feature Description – Attachment Channel RPQ Number 831552, Form A26-1579-0 (PDF). IBM System Reference Library (First ed.). San Jose, California: IBM Corporation. October 1968. Retrieved 2009-08-10.
- "IBM 1231 Optical Mark Page Reader".
- IBM Corporation. "IBM Archives: DPD Chronology (page 4)". Retrieved 10 Aug 2011.
- Hewlett-Packard (December 1971). 2100A Computer Reference Manual (PDF). p. 18. Retrieved August 5, 2016.
- Scirntific Data Systems. 920 Computer Reference Manual (PDF). p. 17. Retrieved August 5, 2016.
- IBM Corporation (1968). IBM 1130 Assembler Language (PDF). Retrieved Feb 6, 2015.
- IBM 1130 Subroutine Library 9th ed (PDF). IBM Corporation. 1974. p. 93.
- Utley, Brian (2006-10-30). "Origin of the IBM 1130 Name". Archived from the original on 2007-10-01. Retrieved 2007-01-16.
- Booch, Grady (2003-04-03). "Grady Booch polishes his crystal ball". IBM. Retrieved 2007-01-16.
- Steele, Guy L. Jr. (2005-11-24). "Thoughts on Language Design -- New challenges require new solutions". Dr. Dobb's Journal. Retrieved 2006-01-16.
- Steele, Guy L. Jr. "Confessions of a Happy Hacker". Archived from the original on 2007-02-03. Retrieved 2006-01-16.
- Rather, Elizabeth; Colburn, Donald; Moore, Charles (March 1993). "The Evolution of Forth". Retrieved 2007-01-16.
- Bricklin, Dan (2002-08-23). "Memories while visiting the Bay Area and the Computer History Museum". Retrieved 2007-01-16.
- Dixon, Bob (2005-08-13). "SETI in the 1970s". The Big Ear. Retrieved 2007-01-16.
- Goldfarb, Charles (1996). "The Roots of SGML -- A Personal Recollection". Retrieved 2007-01-16.
- Kay, Alan C., "The Reactive Engine", Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utah, 1969."The graphics display routines, character generator and editor ran for a year on an IBM 1130 computer with a “home-brew” interface. Unfortunately, the 1130 was straining to just act as a glorified display buffer, and none of the algorithmic routines were implemented."
- Koch, Warren (1972). "The Use of Computers in Instruction in Secondary Schools" (PDF). Retrieved 2014-08-06.
- "Signetics 2650: An IBM on a Chip". CPU Shack. 16 October 2016. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- "IBM 1130". ACONIT (in French). Retrieved July 11, 2016.
- "Artifact Details:BM 1130 model". Computer History Museum. Retrieved July 11, 2016.
- Wyss, Oscar. "Website von Oscar E. Wyss". COSECANS (in German). Retrieved July 11, 2016.
- "IBM 1130 system restoration during 2011". The National Museum of Computing. Archived from the original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved July 11, 2016.
- "Large Systems Gallery: IBM 1130". National Museum of Computing. Archived from the original on 11 February 2020. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
- "IBM 1130". Computermuseum der Fakultät Informatik. Retrieved July 11, 2016.
- Claunch, Carl. "Rescue 1130". Retrieved July 11, 2016.
- PDP-11/20 and /15
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to IBM 1130. |
- IBM Archive: IBM 1130 press releases, chronology, photos, facts folder.
- IBM 1130.org Norm Aleks and Brian Knittel site which has significant information about the 1130 and a downloadable simulator that supports the DMS R2V12 and APL environments.
- www.ibm1130.net is Howard Shubs' site dedicated to the 1130.
- Arnold Reinhold's personal account of the 1130. Text from here has been incorporated into this article with permission
- A set of PDFs made up of scanned IBM 1130 manuals
- Kym Farnik's page on Retro Computing specifically the 1130
- A discussion about the (then) Angle Park computing centre which was equipped with IBM 1130's
- Bob Rosenbloom's IBM 1130 Photos
- IBM 1130 material at Columbia University, Computing History site.
- A Flickr collection of detail photos taken by Peter Vaughan of an IBM 1130 at The National Museum of Computing