Government trifecta

A government trifecta is a political situation in which the same political party controls the executive branch and both chambers of the legislative branch in countries that have a bicameral legislative branch with two houses both have strict separation of powers. The term is primarily used in United States, but also in Argentina, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and France.

Most countries and all democracies have some degree of separation of powers into separate and independent branches of government consisting of an executive, a legislative, and a judicial branch, but the term government trifecta is only applied to countries in which the executive is not elected by the legislature. (In parliamentary systems, the executive [or part of it] is elected by the legislature and must have the support of the majority of the Members of Parliament but is otherwise separate and independent.)

Government trifectas are seen as beneficial by some and as undesirable by others. Those in favor argue that government trifectas are efficient and avoid gridlocks. Opponents argue that trifectas discourage policing of those in power by the opposition and that they do not limit spending and the expansion of undesirable laws.[1] Opponents also argue that government trifectas do not tend to lead to compromise since one party can simply implement its goals unopposed. Consequently, the incumbent party may alter the structure of executive agencies to prepare for when it is bound to lose its incumbency.[2] These alterations are performed to secure control over the agencies for when the party is no longer incumbent. Examples of these include political appointments that extend beyond the political cycle, contract or grant awards, and debt issuances.

The situation is common in developing nations but rare in developed ones. Early in the 20th century, for example, government trifectas were common in the United States, but they have become increasingly rare since the 1970s.

Government trifectas are contrasted by divided governments—a situation in which one party controls the executive branch while another party controls one or both houses of the legislative branch.

Asia-Oceania

Australia

The term is used in Australia, where the government level consists of the government (lead by the Prime Minister and Cabinet) and the Parliament with two chambers (the House of Representatives and the Senate).

Europe

France

The term is used in France, where the government level consists of the president and the Congress of French Parliament with two chambers (the National Assembly and the Senate).

Italy

The term is used in Italy, where the government level consists of the prime minister and the Italian Parliament with two chambers (the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate).

North America

United States
See also: Divided government in the United States
Control of the Senate, Presidency, and House since 1855: any column where all three sections show the same color is a trifecta.

The term is primarily used in the United States, where the federal government level consists of the president and the Congress with its two chambers (the House and the Senate).

Because of the coattail effect, most newly elected presidents have a majority with them in both chambers of Congress. The six-year itch conversely means that the last two years of a two-term president rarely have trifectas. The most recent federal trifecta is currently held by the Democratic Party from 2021-present, and the last one before that was by the Republican Party from 2017 to 2019.

State government trifectas

At the state level, a trifecta means that one party holds the governorship and both legislative houses. The sole exception is in Nebraska, where there is a unicameral legislature.

Year Dem Rep Total Spread
2021 15 23 38 R+8
2020 15 21 36 R+6
2019 14 22 36 R+8
2018 8 26 34 R+18
2017 8 26 34 R+18
2016 6 25 31 R+19
2015 7 24 31 R+17
2014 7 23 30 R+16
2013 12 24 36 R+12
2012 11 23 34 R+12
2011 11 21 32 R+10
2010 16 8 24 D+8
2009 17 9 26 D+8
2008 14 9 23 D+5
2007 15 9 24 D+6
2006 8 12 20 R+4
2005 8 12 20 R+4
2004 9 12 21 R+3
2003 9 12 21 R+3
2002 9 11 20 R+2
2001 9 13 21 R+4
2000 8 15 24 R+7
1999 9 14 23 R+5
1998 6 13 19 R+7
1997 6 12 18 R+6
1996 7 14 21 R+7
1995 8 15 23 R+7
1994 16 4 20 D+12
1993 18 3 21 D+15
1992 15 3 18 D+12

Sources:[3][4]


A visual representation of US state government trifectas over time:

South America

Argentina

The term is used in Argentina, where the government level consists of the president and the Congress with two chambers (the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate).

Bolivia

The term is used in Bolivia, where the government level consists of the president and the Plurinational Legislative Assembly with two chambers (the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate).

Brazil

The term is used in Brazil, where the government level consists of the president and the Congress with two chambers (the Chamber of Deputies and the Federal Senate).

Chile

The term is used in Chile, where the government level consists of the president and the Congress of Chile with two chambers (the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate).

Colombia

The term is used in Colombia, where the government level consists of the president and the Congress of Colombia with two chambers (the Chamber of Representatives and the Senate).

See also

References
  1. "Would Divided Government Be Better?". Cato Institute. Archived from the original on 30 June 2011. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  2. Moe, Terry (1989). "The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure". Retrieved 2016-05-04.
  3. "Ballotpedia: Who Runs The States".
  4. "2018 election analysis: State government trifectas - Ballotpedia". Ballotpedia. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.