Fraxinetum

Fraxinetum or Fraxinet (Arabic: فرخشنيط‎, romanized: Farakhshanīt or فرخشة‎ Farakhsha, from Latin fraxinus: "ash tree", fraxinetum: "ash forest") was the site of Muslim fortress in Provence between about 887 and 972. It is identified with modern La Garde-Freinet, near Saint-Tropez. From this base, the Muslims raided up the Rhône Valley and into Piedmont. For a time, they controlled the passes through the western Alps. They withstood several attempts to oust them, but were finally defeated by the combined forces of the Provençal and Piedmontese nobility.

The Massif des Maures near Fraxinet

The modern Massif des Maures ("plateau of Moors") takes its name from the Muslims of Fraxinetum.

Primary sources
Liutprand mentioning Fraxinetum (underlined)

Christian sources in Latin are more numerous than Muslim ones in Arabic for reconstructing the history of Fraxinetum. The most important contemporary narrative of the Muslims of Fraxinetum is the Antapodosis of Liudprand, bishop of Cremona (d. 972). The bishop also mentions Fraxinetum in his Liber de rebus gestis Ottonis, an account of the reign of King Otto I of Germany.[1] Other contemporary narrative sources in Latin are the Annales of Flodoard, which cover the years 919–966, and the Casus sancti Galli of Ekkehard (d. 973). Documentary sources are few, but the first cartulary of the Abbey of Saint-Victor at Marseille, covering the years 838–1000, contains some references in its charters to Fraxinetum.[2]

Several biographies and saints' lives also contain information relative to Fraxinetum. The anonymous Vita sancti Bobonis, written around 896, is a witness to the foundation and earliest history of Fraxinetum. The Vita Iohannis Gorziensis, a biography of John of Gorze written around 960, contains an account of the diplomacy undertaken by Otto I in response to raids in his territory. The two Vitae sancti Maioli, biographies of Maiolus of Cluny written by Odilo of Cluny and Syrus, are important sources for the capture of their subject, which event brought about the downfall of Fraxinetum.[2]

Among contemporary Muslim sources that mention Fraxinetum are the Arabic Ṣurāt al-Arḍ of Ibn Ḥawqal (977), which is a revised version of the geographical treatise Kitāb al-Masālik waʿl-mamālik by al-Iṣṭakhrī (951), and an anonymous Persian geography, Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam (late 10th century). The Muqtabis of Ibn Ḥayyān (d. 1076) also mentions Fraxinetum.[3]

Location
Fraxinetum in its Mediterranean context, with the Muslim world in green and the Byzantine empire in purple

The fort of Fraxinetum atop the hill Mont des Maures[4] overlooking what is today the village of La Garde-Freinet had been around since the Roman era. Its name is derived from the Latin fraxinus (ash tree) and probably refers to the thick forest of ash that covers the hill. The Muslim geographers al-Iṣṭakhrī and Ibn Ḥawqal call Fraxinetum Jabal al-Qilāl ("mount of timber"). They describe the Muslim enclave as vast, covered with streams and fertile soil and taking two days to cross.[5] Ibn Ḥawqal erroneously considered it an island at the mouth of the Rhône.[6]

Identity

The Muslims of Fraxinetum are described by Liudprand as Saracens (saraceni) from Spain and by the Life of Saint Bobo simply as Spaniards (hispanicolae).[5] Other sources refer to them as fusci (blacks), pagani (heathen) or Hagarenes.[7] According to Ibn Ḥawqal, the settlement was dependent on the Umayyad caliphate of Córdoba.[6]

History

Foundation and expansion
A 12th-century copy of a schematic contemporary Arabic map by al-Iṣṭakhrī depicts Jabal al-Qilāl as a triangular island (top centre) at the western end of the Mediterranean. The map is oriented west up.

The Muslim occupation of Fraxinetum began around 887, according to Liudprand, when a small ship carrying about twenty Andalusī sailors landed near Saint-Tropez. The Andalusīs seized the settlement that had grown up at the foot of the hill and then took control of the fort itself. This was accessible only by a narrow path through the forest, according to both Liudprand and Ibn Ḥawqal.[5]

According to Liudprand, the settlers sent messages back to Spain and the Balearics inviting reinforcements. About 100 warriors answered the call, motivated both by religious zeal and a desire for plunder. In the first two decades of their rule, the Muslims of Fraxinetum subdued all of Provence and began raiding across the Alps in Italy. Liudprand blamed their quick success on the divisions and squabbles of the Provençals following the collapes of Carolingian authority.[6] By 906, they controlled the pass of Mont Cenis between Provence and Italy. In that year, they attacked or occupied Acqui, Oulx and Susa in Italy.[8] According to the 11th-century Chronicon Novalicense, they threatened the Abbey of Novalesa on this occasion.[6] By 911, they were in control of all the western Alpine passes, from which they could collect tolls on traders and pilgrims.[9] Between 915 and 918, they raided Embrun, Maurienne and Vienne. In 920, there were more attacks in Italy and on Marseille and Aix-en-Provence in western Provence.[8]

Between 929 and 933, the Muslims of Fraxinetum extended their control to the more easterly Alpine passes and raided the Upper Rhône Valley.[10] In 939, crossing the Alps again, they attacked the Abbey of Saint Gall and razed the Abbey of Saint-Maurice d'Agaune. Like the contemporary Vikings, the Muslim raiders target monasteries because of their wealth and lack of defences.[6]

High point

Men from Fraxinetum may have participated in the Fatimid raid on Genoa in 935. They certainly destroyed the port of Fréjus in 940, prompting a response from King Hugh of Italy. In 941 or 942, he sought an alliance with the Byzantine Empire and received a favourable response from the Emperor Romanos Lekapenos. While he attacked Fraxinetum by land, a fleet of Byzantine chelandia destroyed the Muslim ships with Greek fire.[11] At the moment when Fraxinetum on the cusp of surrender, Hugh received news that a rival for the Italian throne, Margrave Berengar of Ivrea, was preparing to invade Italy with an army of Saxons from his exile in Germany. Hugh called off the siege and made an arrangement with the Muslims. They were allowed to keep the Alpine passes, presumably in exchange for defending the Italian frontier. It is possible that Hugh's abrupt change of policy was also related to the commercial relations he opened up with the Umayyad caliphate around the same time.[12]

Hugh's decision was condemned by contemporary Christian writers. Liudprand blamed him for the death of hundreds or even thousands of Christians. In the decade of the 940s, Fraxinetum was at the apex of its power and gave shelter to a number of Christian rebels.[12] After his downfall in 962, King Adalbert of Italy took refuge in Fraxinetum.[13] In his Annals, under the year 951, Flodoard of Reims records that "the Saracens occupying the Alpine passes extract tribute from travellers to Rome, only thus allowing them to pass."[12]

Around 954, Fraxinetum came into conflict with Hungarian invaders. King Conrad of Burgundy took advantage of the conflict to slaughter both sides. The major defeat dealt to the Hungarians by King Otto I of Germany at the Battle of Lechfeld the following year allowed the German king to focus on the threat from Fraxinetum.[14] At one point a military expedition may have been planned, but it never took place. This did not stop Widukind of Corvey from listing the Saracens among Otto's defeated enemies.[15]

Decline and defeat
Fraxinetum in its political surroundings, the kingdom of Provence

In 956, a raid into the Upper Rhine Valley prompted Otto I to send an embassy to the Umayyad court, which he clearly believed had the power to control Fraxinetum.[16] Ballan calls their raid deep into Otto's territory "their first major miscalculation". Several embassies were exchanged between the two most powerful courts in western Europe. After this, material aid from Spain to Fraxinetum declined substantially.[13]

In 972, the Muslims captured Abbot Maiolus of Cluny while he was crossing the Alps and held him for ransom. After his release, Maiolus organized a military response.[14] Led by Count William I of Provence and Count Arduin of Turin, a Christian force drawn from Provence, Piedmont and Septimania defeated the Muslims in the Battle of Tourtour in the summer of 972. Fraxinetum fell by the end of the year after a short siege.[17]

With the fall of Fraxinetum, those Muslims who did not go in to exile were either killed or sold into slavery. Many converted to Christianity and remained in Provence as serfs, while the formerly Muslim lands were parcelled out among the victorious Provençal nobles.[18]

Governance

The Muslims of Fraxinetum established forts throughout the areas they conquered in Provence and Piedmont, but Latin sources do not distinguish them, calling all of them Fraxinetum or a variant thereof, such as Frassineto, Frascendello or Fraxinth.[19] A string of forts was constructed across the Alps to control the mountain passes and serve as bases for raiding.[13]

The form of Islamic rule imposed by Fraxinetum was indirect. Christians retained their religion and towns their self-government through agreeing to the dhimma (the pact of submission) and paying the jizya (a head tax).[19]

Archaeological evidence in the form of 10th-century Muslim shipwrecks off the coast of Provence suggests that Fraxinetum maintained commercial links with the rest of the Muslim world.[20]

Timeline

See also

References
  1. Ballan 2010, pp. 30 & 33.
  2. Ballan 2010, p. 34.
  3. Ballan 2010, p. 35.
  4. Wenner 1980, p. 59.
  5. Ballan 2010, p. 26.
  6. Ballan 2010, p. 27.
  7. Versteegh 1990, p. 359.
  8. Wenner 1980, p. 74.
  9. Wenner 1980, p. 74; Ballan 2010, p. 29.
  10. Wenner 1980, p. 74; Ballan 2010, p. 29, implies that they held all the passes since 921.
  11. Pryor & Jeffreys 2006, p. 72 (942); Ballan 2010, p. 28 (941); but Wenner 1980, p. 74, dates this attack to 931, while Pryor & Jeffreys, p. 69, distinguish between the attacks of 931 and 942.
  12. Ballan 2010, p. 29.
  13. Ballan 2010, p. 30.
  14. Ballan 2010, p. 31.
  15. Leyser 1968, p. 2, n1.
  16. Ballan 2010, p. 30; Wenner 1980, p. 75.
  17. Pryor & Jeffreys 2006, p. 69; Ballan 2010, p. 32, notes that a number of sources place Fraxinetum's fall in 990.
  18. Ballan 2010, p. 32.
  19. Ballan 2010, p. 28.
  20. Pryor & Jeffreys 2006, p. 69.

Bibliography

Primary sources
  • Flodoard (2014). Bernard S. Bachrach; Steven Fanning; Philippe Lauer (eds.). The Annals of Flodoard of Reims, 919–966. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Liudprand (2007). Paolo Squatriti (ed.). The Complete Works of Liudprand of Cremona. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.

Secondary sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.