Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.
Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that receiving a television broadcast does not constitute a "performance" of a work.[1]
Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc. | |
---|---|
Argued March 13, 1968 Decided June 17, 1968 | |
Full case name | Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc. |
Citations | 392 U.S. 390 (more) 88 S. Ct. 2084; 20 L. Ed. 2d 1176 |
Case history | |
Prior | 377 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1967) |
Holding | |
Receiving a television broadcast does not constitute a "performance" of a work. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stewart, joined by Warren, Black, Brennan, White |
Dissent | Fortas |
Douglas, Marshall, and Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
In 1968, the United States Copyright Office called this case "the most important American copyright case of the 1960s."[2]
References
- Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390 (1968).
- Abraham L. Kaminstein. 71st Annual Report of the Register of Copyrights (PDF) (Report). United States Copyright Office. Retrieved 2018-08-19.
External links
- Text of Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390 (1968) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.