Faktura
The term of faktura (Russian: фактура) emerged in Russian art criticism before the First World War. David Burliuk used the term as a Russian equivalent of the French word "facture" which refers to the texture of the painted surface.[1] Voldemārs Matvejs used the term in his 1914 text "Printsipy tvorchestva v plasticheskikh iskussvakh: Faktura (Principles of Creation in the Visual Arts: Faktura).[2]
It was later developed by Russian Constructivism.[3] Alongside tectonics and construction, faktura constituted one of the three core principles defined by Aleksei Gan in his book Konstruktivizm. In the period after the Russian Revolution, new definitions of art had to be found, such as the definition of art objects as "laboratory experiments". "Faktura" was the single most important quality of these art objects, according to the critic Victor Shklovsky, referring to the material aspect of the appearance.[4][5][6] The surface of the object had to demonstrate how it had been made, exhibiting its own distinct property.[7]
Thus Faktura could be characterised as the visual demonstration of properties inherent to materials, as illustrated in Corner Counter Relief (1914) by Vladimir Tatlin.
References
- Lodder, Christina (2018). Celebrating Suprematism. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-38498-9.
- Rowell, Margit (1978). "Vladimir Tatlin: Form/Faktura" (PDF). October. 7 (Winter 1978): 83–108. doi:10.2307/778388. JSTOR 778388.
- Christina Lodder and Benjamin Benus (2012). "Constructivism". Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 13 January 2014.
- Оиси, Масахико (1987). "О Понятии". Japanese Slavic and East European Studies. 8: 39–55.
- Crone, Rainer; Moos, David (1991). Kazimir Malevich: The Climax of Disclosure. Reaktion Books. ISBN 978-0-948462-81-8.
- Fer, Briony; Batchelor, David; Wood, Paul (1993-01-01). Realism, Rationalism, Surrealism: Art Between the Wars. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05519-1.
- Gouch, Maria (1999). "Faktura: The Making of the Russian Avant-Garde". Res: Journal of Anthropology and Aesthetics. 36: 32–59. doi:10.1086/RESv36n1ms20167475.