Droitwich (UK Parliament constituency)
Droitwich was the name of a constituency of the House of Commons of England in 1295, and again from 1554, then of the House of Commons of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It was a parliamentary borough in Worcestershire, represented by two Members of Parliament until 1832, and by one member from 1832 to 1885. The name was then transferred to a county constituency electing one MP from 1885 until 1918.
Worcestershire, Mid or Droitwich Division | |
---|---|
Former County constituency for the House of Commons | |
1885–1918 | |
Number of members | one |
Replaced by | Kidderminster and Evesham |
1554–1885 | |
Number of members | two (1554–1832); one (1832–1885) |
Type of constituency | Borough constituency |
History
The borough consisted of three parishes and parts of two others in the town of Droitwich, a market town which for many centuries depended on the salt trade for its prosperity. When Droitwich's right to return MPs (which had been allowed to lapse) was restored in 1554, there was only one salt pit in the borough, and this became the basis of Droitwich's unique franchise: the right to vote was vested solely in those burgesses (members of the corporation) who owned shares in the pit giving them the right to draw brine. This was finally established by a resolution of the House of Commons in 1690; yet within a few years of this date that salt pit had dried up completely; by 1747 it was accepted that ownership of this property had no function except conferring the vote, and had to be proved by possession of the title deeds since there could be no evidence of an otherwise meaningless right which could not be exercised in practice.
Although these details of the franchise were unique to Droitwich, in practice it in many ways resembled a burgage borough, and like most of those came under the influence of a local magnate. The Foley family, Worcestershire industrialists, controlled Droitwich from the middle of the 17th century, although they seem to have allowed the townspeople to choose one of the two members at some periods. There was no contested election between 1747 and 1832, and by the time of the Reform Act it was estimated that only 28 men had the right to vote.
In 1831, the population of the borough was 2,487, and contained 533 houses. However, the boundaries were revised by the provisions of the Great Reform Act, taking in the rest of the town and some adjoining villages, so that the new constituency adjoined the borough of Worcester to the south. This increased the population to 5,992, which was enough for Droitwich to retain one of its two MPs, and there were 243 voters on the register for the first election under the reformed franchise, in 1832.
There was a further slight enlargement of the boundaries to the east in 1868. However, the constituency was not big enough to keep its MP under the Third Reform Act, which came into effect at the general election of 1885. The borough was abolished, but the town's name was applied to the new county division in which it was placed, formally called The Mid or Droitwich Division of Worcestershire. This was a constituency with a considerable industrial vote, including the heavy industrial town of Stourbridge and the carpet-weaving town of Stourport-on-Severn, but also contained a substantial middle-class residential population, boosted by the votes of the Kidderminster freeholders (who were entitled to a vote in the county division even if they lived within the Kidderminster borough boundaries), as well as agricultural interests. With a popular sitting Liberal MP turning Liberal Unionist in 1886, this was enough to keep Droitwich a relatively safe Unionist seat except in the Liberal landslide of 1906.
The constituency was abolished in 1918, being divided between the redrawn Kidderminster and Evesham constituencies.
Members of Parliament
MPs 1554–1660
The constituency was re-established during the reign of Queen Mary I. The following were members of Parliament during the succeeding period:[1]
Year | First member | First party | Second member | Second party | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1554 | George Newport | Robert Wythe | ||||
1555 | George Newport | Robert Wythe | ||||
1558 | Walter Gower | Robert Wythe | ||||
1559 | Francis Newport | |||||
1562 | Walter Gower | |||||
1571 | Francis Brace | Francis Kinwelmarsh | ||||
1572 | John Russell | William Sebright | ||||
1584 | George Wylde I | Jasper Cholmley | ||||
1586 | Francis Brace | George Lyttelton | ||||
1588 | Francis Brace | William Combe | ||||
1593 | Robert Walter | George Wylde I | ||||
1597 | John Acton | Thomas Baily | ||||
1601 | John Buck | Humphrey Wheler | ||||
1604 | George Wylde I | John Brace | ||||
1614 | Edwin Sandys | Ralph Clare | ||||
1621 | Sir Thomas Coventry replaced by Ralph Clare | John Wilde | ||||
1624 | Walter Blount | |||||
1625 | Thomas Coventry | |||||
1626 | ||||||
1627 | George Wylde II | |||||
1629–1640 | Personal Rule of Charles I: no Parliament | |||||
1640 Short Parliament | John Wilde | Samuel Sandys I | Royalist | |||
1640 Long Parliament | Endymion Porter | Royalist | ||||
Aug. 1642 | disabled to sit – seat vacant | |||||
Mar. 1643 | disabled to sit – seat vacant | |||||
1647 | Thomas Rainsborough | Edmund Wylde | ||||
1648 | George Wylde II (died 1650) | |||||
1653 | Droitwich was unrepresented in the Barebones Parliament and the First and Second Parliaments of the Protectorate | |||||
1659 | Edward Salway | John Wilde | ||||
1659 | Third Protectorate Parliament – unknown | |||||
MPs 1660–1832
MPs 1832–1885
Election | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1832 | John Hodgetts-Foley | Whig[7][8][9] | |
1835 | John Barneby | Conservative[7] | |
1837 | Sir John Pakington | Conservative[7] | |
1874 | John Corbett | Liberal | |
1885 | Borough abolished – county division established |
MPs 1885–1918
Election | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1885 | John Corbett | Liberal | |
1886 | Liberal Unionist | ||
1892 | Richard Martin | Liberal Unionist | |
1906 | Cecil Harmsworth | Liberal | |
Jan. 1910 | John Lyttelton | Liberal Unionist | |
1916 b-e | Herbert Whiteley | Unionist | |
1918 | Constituency abolished |
Election results
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Molyneux | Unopposed | |||
Whig | John Hodgetts-Foley | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Hodgetts-Foley | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Thomas Winnington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | c. 28 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Hodgetts-Foley | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 243 | ||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Barneby | 128 | 50.6 | ||
Whig | John Hodgetts-Foley | 125 | 49.4 | ||
Majority | 3 | 1.2 | |||
Turnout | 253 | 88.8 | |||
Registered electors | 285 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
On petition, Barneby's tally was reduced to 125, and Foley's to 124.[7]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 341 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 347 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 346 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1850s
Pakington was appointed Secretary of State for War and the Colonies, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 367 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 371 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Pakington was appointed First Lord of the Admiralty, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 394 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1860s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 400 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Pakington was appointed First Lord of the Admiralty, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Pakington was appointed Secretary of State for War, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pakington | 790 | 56.7 | N/A | |
Liberal | John Corbett | 603 | 43.3 | New | |
Majority | 187 | 13.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,393 | 90.9 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,532 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Corbett | 787 | 66.2 | +22.9 | |
Conservative | John Pakington | 401 | 33.8 | −22.9 | |
Majority | 386 | 32.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,188 | 86.3 | −4.6 | ||
Registered electors | 1,377 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +22.9 | |||
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Corbett | 857 | 70.8 | +4.6 | |
Conservative | George Allsopp | 348 | 28.8 | −5.0 | |
Liberal | Ernest B. A. Jones[12] | 5 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 509 | 42.0 | +9.6 | ||
Turnout | 1,210 | 85.9 | −0.4 | ||
Registered electors | 1,408 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +4.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Corbett | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Corbett | 4,031 | 59.3 | New | |
Liberal | Arthur James Dadson[15] | 2,761 | 40.7 | N/A | |
Majority | 1,270 | 18.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,792 | 71.6 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 9,484 | ||||
Liberal Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1890s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Richard Martin | 3,980 | 53.9 | −5.4 | |
Liberal | Thomas English Stephens[17] | 3,410 | 46.1 | +5.4 | |
Majority | 570 | 7.8 | −10.8 | ||
Turnout | 7,390 | 75.5 | +3.9 | ||
Registered electors | 9,786 | ||||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | −5.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Richard Martin | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist hold |
Elections in the 1900s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Richard Martin | 4,020 | 51.7 | N/A | |
Liberal | Cecil Harmsworth | 3,752 | 48.3 | New | |
Majority | 268 | 3.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,772 | 76.4 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 10,175 | ||||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Cecil Harmsworth | 5,165 | 52.8 | +4.5 | |
Conservative | Eric Ayshford Knight | 4,611 | 47.2 | −4.5 | |
Majority | 554 | 5.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 9,776 | 86.6 | +10.2 | ||
Registered electors | 11,283 | ||||
Liberal gain from Liberal Unionist | Swing | +4.5 | |||
Elections in the 1910s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Lyttelton | 5,078 | 50.5 | +3.3 | |
Liberal | Cecil Harmsworth | 4,973 | 49.5 | −3.3 | |
Majority | 105 | 1.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 10,051 | 89.7 | +1.1 | ||
Registered electors | 11,200 | ||||
Liberal Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +3.3 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Lyttelton | 4,880 | 50.4 | −0.1 | |
Liberal | Clifford H Brookes | 4,808 | 49.6 | +0.1 | |
Majority | 72 | 0.8 | −0.2 | ||
Turnout | 9,688 | 86.5 | −3.2 | ||
Registered electors | 11,200 | ||||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | −0.1 |
General Election 1914/15:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
- Unionist: John Lyttelton
- Liberal: Clifford H Brookes[20]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Herbert Whiteley | Unopposed | |||
Unionist hold |
References
- 1557–1640, 1659, 1681: Treadway Russell Nash, History and Antiquities of the County of Worcester I (1782), introduction, xxxii.
- Winnington changed his name to Jeffreys during the Parliament of 1708–10
- Winnington was re-elected at the election of 1741 but had also been elected for Worcester, which he chose to represent, and did not sit again for Droitwich
- At the election of 1747 the returning officer made a double return, naming Thomas Foley, Francis Winnington and Samuel Masham as elected; after the consideration the Commons committee declared Winnington and Edwin Sandys (who had petitioned against the result) as the duly elected members
- Thomas Foley elected to sit for Herefordshire, replaced by Edward Foley
- Robert Harley died 15 March 1774 and replaced by Andrew Foley
- Stooks Smith, Henry (1845). The Parliaments of England, from 1st George I., to the Present Time. Vol II: Oxfordshire to Wales Inclusive. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co. pp. 129–130. Retrieved 18 August 2018 – via Google Books.
- "The Elections". Worcester Journal. 29 July 1847. p. 3. Retrieved 19 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Election Intelligence". Morning Post. 22 July 1847. p. 3. Retrieved 19 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Salmon, Philip. "Droitwich". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
- Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book)
|format=
requires|url=
(help) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3. - "Great Liberal Meeting at the Music Hall". Worcestershire Chronicle. 27 March 1880. p. 8. Retrieved 25 November 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- The Liberal Year Book, 1908
- Craig, FWS, ed. (1974). British Parliamentary Election Results: 1885-1918. London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 9781349022984.
- [16 Jul 1886 "Droitwich"] Check
|url=
value (help). Diss Express. 16 July 1886. p. 6. Retrieved 25 November 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive. - British parliamentary election results, 1885-1918 (Craig)
- "A Liberal for the Droitwich Division". Greenock Telegraph and Clyde Shipping Gazette. 25 November 1891. p. 3. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
- Debrett's House of Commons, 1901
- Debrett's House of Commons, 1918
- Birmingham Daily Post 29 Jan 1914
- D Brunton & D H Pennington, Members of the Long Parliament (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954)
- F W S Craig, "British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885" (2nd edition, Aldershot: Parliamentary Research Services, 1989)
- Michael Kinnear, The British Voter (London: BH Batsford, Ltd, 1968)
- Henry Pelling, Social Geography of British Elections 1885–1910 (London: Macmillan, 1967)
- J Holladay Philbin, Parliamentary Representation 1832 – England and Wales (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965)
- Edward Porritt and Annie G Porritt, The Unreformed House of Commons (Cambridge University Press, 1903)
- Frederic A Youngs, jr, "Guide to the Local Administrative Units of England, Vol II" (London: Royal Historical Society, 1991)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "D" (part 3)