Chiastic structure

Chiastic structure, or chiastic pattern, is a literary technique in narrative motifs and other textual passages. An example of chiastic structure would be two ideas, A and B, together with variants A' and B', being presented as A,B,B',A'. Chiastic structures that involve more components are sometimes called "ring structures", "ring compositions", or, in cases of very ambitious chiasmus, "onion-ring compositions". These may be regarded as chiasmus scaled up from words and clauses to larger segments of text.

These often symmetrical patterns are commonly found in ancient literature such as the epic poetry of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Classicist Bruno Gentili describes this technique as "the cyclical, circular, or 'ring' pattern (ring composition). Here the idea that introduced a compositional section is repeated at its conclusion, so that the whole passage is framed by material of identical content".[1] Meanwhile, in classical prose, scholars often find chiastic narrative techniques in the Histories of Herodotus:

"Herodotus frequently uses ring composition or 'epic regression' as a way of supplying background information for something discussed in the narrative. First an event is mentioned briefly, then its precedents are reviewed in reverse chronological order as far back as necessary; at that point the narrative reverses itself and moves forward in chronological order until the event in the main narrative line is reached again."[2]

Various chiastic structures are also seen in the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament, the Book of Mormon,[3] and the Quran.

Etymology

When read left to right, top to bottom, the first topic (A) is reiterated as the last, and the middle concept (B) appears twice in succession. (Also, the middle concept could appear just once.)

The term chiastic derives from the mid-17th century term chiasmus, which refers to a crosswise arrangement of concepts or words that are repeated in reverse order. Chiasmus derives from the Greek word khiasmos, a word that is khiazein, marked with the letter khi. From khi comes chi.[4]

Chi is made up of two lines crossing each other as in the shape of an X. The line that starts leftmost on top, comes down, and is rightmost on the bottom, and vice versa. If one thinks of the lines as concepts, one sees that concept A, which comes first, is also last, and concept B, which comes after A, comes before A. If one adds in more lines representing other concepts, one gets a chiastic structure with more concepts. See Proverbs 1:20-33; vs 20-21=A, v 22=B, v 23=C, vs 24-25=D, vs 26-28=E, vs 29-30=D', v 31=C', v 32=B', v 33=A'.[5]

Mnemonic device

Oral literature is especially rich in chiastic structure, possibly as an aid to memorization and oral performance. In his study of Homer's Iliad and Odyssey, Cedric Whitman, for instance, finds chiastic patterns "of the most amazing virtuosity" that simultaneously performed both aesthetic and mnemonic functions, permitting the oral poet easily to recall the basic structure of the composition during performances.[6] Steve Reece has demonstrated several ambitious ring compositions in Homer's Odyssey and compared their aesthetic and mnemonic functions with examples of demonstrably oral Serbo-Croatian epic. [7]

Use in Hebrew Bible

In 1986, William H. Shea proposed that the Book of Daniel is composed of a double-chiasm. He argued that the chiastic structure is emphasized by the two languages that the book is written in: Aramaic and Hebrew. The first chiasm is written in Aramaic from chapters 2-7 following an ABC...CBA pattern. The second chiasm is in Hebrew from chapters 8-12, also using the ABC...CBA pattern. However, Shea represents Daniel 9:26 as "D", a break in the center of the pattern.[8]

Gordon Wenham has analyzed the Genesis Flood narrative and believes that it is essentially an elaborate chiasm.[9] Based on the earlier study of grammatical structure by F. I. Andersen,[10] Wenham illustrated a chiastic structure as displayed in the following two tables.

Chiastic structure of the Genesis Flood Narrative

A: Noah and his sons (Gen 6:10) B: All life on earth (6:13:a) C: Curse on earth (6:13:b) D: Flood announced (6:7) E: Ark (6:14-16) F: All living creatures (6:17–20 ) G: Food (6:21) H: Animals in man's hands (7:2–3) I: Entering the Ark (7:13–16) J: Waters increase (7:17–20) X: God remembers Noah (8:1) J': Waters decrease (8:13–14) I': Exiting the Ark (8:15–19) H': Animals (9:2,3) G': Food (9:3,4) F': All living creatures (9:10a) E': Ark (9:10b) D': No flood in future (9:11) C': Blessing on earth (9:12–17) B': All life on earth (9:16) A': Noah and his sons (9:18,19a)

Within this overall structure, there is a numerical mini-chiasm of 7s, 40s, and 150s:

Chiasm of the numbers 7, 40, and 150

α: Seven days waiting to enter Ark (7:4) β: Second mention of seven days waiting (7:10) γ: 40 days (7:17) δ: 150 days (7:24) χ: God remembers Noah (8:1) δ': 150 days (8:3) γ': 40 days (8:6) β': Seven days waiting for dove (8:10) α': Second seven days waiting for dove (8:12)

Use in New Testament

Form critic, Nils Lund, acknowledged Jewish and classical patterns of writing in the New Testament, including the use of chiastic structures throughout.[11]

Use in Book of Mormon

Chiastic structure is found throughout the Book of Mormon,[12] for example in Mosiah 5:8-9:

8 And under this head ye are made free, and there is no other head whereby ye can be made free.

    A There is no other name given whereby salvation cometh;

        B therefore, I would that ye should take upon you the name of Christ,

            C all you that have entered into the covenant with God

                D that ye should be obedient unto the end of your lives.

9              D And it shall come to pass that whosoever doeth this

            C shall be found at the right hand of God,

        B for he shall know the name by which he is called;

    A for he shall be called by the name of Christ.

Use in the Quran

While there are many examples of chiastic structure in the Quran, perhaps the most well known is in the 'Verse of the Throne' or 'Ayat al-Kursi'. The verse contains 9 sentences which exhibit chiasmus, but perhaps more interesting is that it is found in the longest chapter of the Quran, Al-Baqara, which itself contains a fractal chiastic structure in its 286 verses, i.e. where each (outer) chiasm is composed of (inner) chiastic structures reflected in some sense in the analogue outer chiasm. One such analysis of the chapter is shown below (from;[13] alternate and/or more detail analyses can be found in,[14][15][16]).

Chiastic structure of Sura 2: The Cow

A: Belief (1-20) Aa: Believers (1-5) Ab: Unbelievers (6-20) B: God's creation and knowledge (21-39) Ba: Evidence of God: Life and death, bringing the dead back to life (28) Bb: God knows all (29-30, 32-33) C: Early prophets and books (40-103) Ca: God gave Moses the Book (43, 87) Cb: Solomon, son of David (102) D: Trials (104-152) Da: Abraham tested by God (124) Db: Abraham and Ishmael built Ka'ba (127) Dc: Concealing testimony (140) Dd: People of the book (Jews and Christians) say... (111, 113, 116, 118, 135) D': Trials (153-177) Da': Muslims will be tested (155) Db': Pilgrimage to the Ka'ba (158) Dc': Concealing God's signs and revelations (159, 174) Dd': Polytheists say... (167, 170) C': Early prophets and books (178-253) Ca': It has been written (prescribed) for you (178, 180, 183, 216) Cb': David, father of Solomon (251) B': God's creation and knowledge (254-284) Ba': Evidence of God: Life and death, bringing the dead back to life (258-260) Bb': God knows all (255-256,261,268,270-271,273,282-284) A': Belief (285-286) Aa': Believers (285) Ab': Unbelievers (286)

ABC…CBA pattern

Beowulf

In literary texts with a possible oral origin, such as Beowulf, chiastic or ring structures are often found on an intermediate level, that is, between the (verbal and/or grammatical) level of chiasmus and the higher level of chiastic structure such as noted in the Torah. John D. Niles provides examples of chiastic figures on all three levels.[17] He notes that for the instances of ll. 12–19, the announcement of the birth of (Danish) Beowulf, are chiastic, more or less on the verbal level, that of chiasmus.[18] Then, each of the three main fights are organized chiastically, a chiastic structure on the level of verse paragraphs and shorter passages. For instance, the simplest of these three, the fight with Grendel, is schematized as follows:

A: Preliminaries

• Grendel approaching
• Grendel rejoicing
• Grendel devouring Handscioh

B: Grendel's wish to flee ("fingers cracked")

C: Uproar in hall; Danes stricken with terror

HEOROT IN DANGER OF FALLING

C': Uproar in hall; Danes stricken with terror

B': "Joints burst"; Grendel forced to flee

A': Aftermath

• Grendel slinking back toward fens
• Beowulf rejoicing
• Beowulf left with Grendel's arm[19]

Finally, Niles provides a diagram of the highest level of chiastic structure, the organization of the poem as a whole, in an introduction, three major fights with interludes before and after the second fight (with Grendel's mother), and an epilogue. To illustrate, he analyzes Prologue and Epilogue as follows:

Prologue
A: Panegyric for Scyld

B: Scyld's funeral

C: History of Danes before Hrothgar

D: Hrothgar's order to build Heorot

Epilogue

D': Beowulf's order to build his barrow

C': History of Geats after Beowulf ("messenger's prophecy")

B': Beowulf's funeral

A': Eulogy for Beowulf[20]

Paradise Lost

The overall chiastic structure of John Milton's Paradise Lost is also of the ABC...CBA type:

A: Satan's sinful actions (Books 1–3)

B: Entry into Paradise (Book 4)

C: War in heaven (destruction) (Books 5–6)

C': Creation of the world (Books 7–8)

B': Loss of paradise (Book 9)

A': Humankind's sinful actions (Books 10–12)[21]^:141

See also

• Arch form
• Antimetabole
• Chiasmus

References

1. Gentili, Bruno, Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century, trans. A. Thomas Cole (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988), 48
2. Boedeker, Deborah. "Epic Heritage and Mythical Patterns in Herodotus." Published in Companion to Herodotus, ed. Egbert J. Bakker, Irene J. F. de Jong, and Hans van Wees (Brill, 2002), 104–05.
3. "Alma 36: 3-27". Retrieved 10 January 2018.
4. "Chiasmus", Oxford Living Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, retrieved 2014-07-10
5. Garrett 1993, p. 71
6. Whitman, Cedric M. (1958), Homer and the Heroic Tradition, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, OCLC 310021.
7. Steve Reece, "The Three Circuits of the Suitors: A Ring Composition in Odyssey 17-22," Oral Tradition 10.1 (1995) 207-229. Ring Composition in the Odyssey
8. Shea 1986
9. Gordon J. Wenham, "The Coherence of the Flood Narrative" Vetus Testamentum 28 (1978) 336–348.
10. F. I. Andersen, The Sentence in Biblical Hebrew (The Hague, 1974).
11. Nils Wilhelm Lund, Chiasmus in the New Testament: A Study in the Form and Function of Chiastic Structures (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1992), 8.
12. Parry, Donald (2007). "Poetic Parallelisms in the Book of Mormon" (PDF). Neal A. Maxwell Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 26 July 2020.
13. Abu Zakariya, "Ring Theory: the Quran’s Structural Coherence", September 21, 2015, https://www.islam21c.com/islamic-thought/ring-theory-the-qurans-structural-coherence/
14. Raymond K. Farrin, "Surat al‐Baqara: A Structural Analysis", January 19, 2010, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2009.01299.x
15. Hassan uz Zaman Shamol, http://understandquran.com/coherence-evidence-of-the-qurans-literary-depth.html
16. Muhammad Rizvi , " Symmetry in Sura al-Baqara", June 01 2018, https://tgminitiative.blogspot.com/2018/06/symmetry-in-sura-al-baqara.html
17. Niles 1979, pp. 924–35
18. Niles 1979, pp. 924–25
19. Niles 1979, pp. 925–6
20. Niles 1979, p. 930
21. Ryken, Leland (2004). "Paradise Lost by John Milton (1608–1674)". In Kapic, Kelly M.; Gleason, Randall C. (eds.). The Devoted Life: An Invitation to the Puritan Classics. Downers Grove, Illinois: Inter-Varsity Press. pp. 138–151. ISBN 978-0-8308-2794-7. OCLC 55495010. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-06-23.

Sources

• Garrett, Duane A. (1993). Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of songs. The New American Commentary, v. 14. Nashville, Tennessee: Broadman Press. ISBN 978-0-8054-0114-1. OCLC 27895425.
• Niles, John D. (1979). "Ring Composition and the Structure of Beowulf". PMLA. 94 (5): 924–35. doi:10.2307/461974. JSTOR 461974.
• Shea, William H. (1986). "The Prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27". In Holbrook, Frank (ed.). The Seventy Weeks, Leviticus, and the Nature of Prophecy. Daniel and Revelation Committee Series. 3. Washington, D.C.: Biblical Research Institute, General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists. OCLC 14279279.

Further reading

• Breck, John (1994). The Shape of Biblical Language: Chiasmus in the Scriptures and Beyond. Crestwood, N.Y.: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0-8814-1139-3. OCLC 30893460.
• Dorsey, David A. (1999), The Literary Structure of the Old Testament: A Commentary on Genesis-Malachi, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, ISBN 978-0801021879, OCLC 42002627
• Douglas, Mary (2007). Thinking in Circles: an essay on ring composition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-16785-6.
• Ehrman, Bart D. (1993), The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: the effect of early Christological controversies on the text of the New Testament, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0195080780, OCLC 26354078
• Lund, Nils Wilhelm (1942), Chiasmus in the New Testament, a study in Formgeschichte, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, OCLC 2516087
• Martin, Gary D. (2004), Ring Composition and Related Phenomena in Herodotus (PDF)
• McCoy, Brad (Fall 2003), "Chiasmus: An Important Structural Device Commonly Found in Biblical Literature" (PDF), CTS Journal, 9 (2): 18–34, archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-11-22, retrieved 2014-06-18
• Parry, Donald W. (2007) [1998], Poetic Parallelisms in the Book of Mormon (PDF) (Revised ed.), Provo, Utah: Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, ISBN 978-0-934893-36-7, archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-14, retrieved 2014-06-18
• Prewitt, Terry J. (1990), The Elusive Covenant: A Structural-Semiotic Reading of Genesis, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, ISBN 978-0253345998, OCLC 20827915
• Ramirez, Matthew Eric (January 2011). "Descanting on Deformity: The Irregularities in Shakespeare's Large Chiasms". Text and Performance Quarterly. 31 (1): 37–49. doi:10.1080/10462937.2010.526240. S2CID 170466856.
• Welch, John W. (1995), "Criteria for Identifying and Evaluating the Presence of Chiasmus", Journal of Book of Mormon Studies, 4 (2), archived from the original on 2015-10-13, retrieved 2014-06-18
• Welch, John W. (1999) [1981], Chiasmus in antiquity: structures, analyses, exegesis, Provo, Utah: Research Press, ISBN 978-0934893336, OCLC 40126818