Bhutasamkhya system

Bhūtasaṃkhyā system is a method of recording numbers using ordinary words having connotations of numerical values. The method was popular among Indian astronomers and mathematicians since ancient times. Sanskrit was the language from which words were chosen to write numbers in the bhūtasaṃkhyā system.[1][2][3] The system has been described as the "concrete number notation" for the representation of numbers.[4]

The number "two" can be associated with the word "eye" as every human being has two eyes. Thus every Sanskrit word having the meaning "eye" was used to denote "two". All words synonymous with "earth" could be used to signify the number "one" as there is only one earth. Concepts, ideas, and objects from all facets of Indian cultural experience – mythological, puranic, literary, religious, etc. – were harvested to generate number-connoting words.[1] As an illustration, every Sanskrit word indicating an "arrow" has been used to denote "five" as Kamadeva, the Hindu deity of love, is traditionally depicted as a warrior carrying five arrows of flowers. The Sanskrit word anuṣṭubh has been used to signify "eight" as it is the name of a meter with eight syllables in a foot.[1] Any Sanskrit word for "tooth" could be used to denote 32 as a grown-up man has a full set of 32 teeth. Terms implying "the gods" were used to indicate 33 as it is believed that the number of devas (gods) is 33 koti. (The Vedas refer to not 33 crore Devatas but 33 types (Koti in Sanskrit) of Devatas. They are explained in Shatpath Brahman and many other scriptures very clearly. )

Single words indicating smaller numbers were strung together to form phrases and sentences for representing arbitrary large numbers. This formation of large numbers was accomplished by incorporating the place value system into the scheme. While decoding numbers encoded in the bhūtasaṃkhyā system, one should bear in mind the specialty of the Indian method of writing numbers. The various digits were written from left to right; that is, the digit with the lowest place value is written as the left most digit. The various digits of a large number are arranged from left to right in the increasing order of the place value. This specialty, succinctly indicated by the Sanskrit adage aṅkūnāṃ vāmato gatiḥ, has been extended to the bhūtasaṃkhyā system also. As an example, consider a certain number used extensively in Indian astronomy. Varahamihira (505 – 587 CE), an Indian astronomer, mathematician, and astrologer, encoded this number in bhūtasaṃkhyā as kha-kh-āṣṭi-yamāḥ.[1] The individual words in this are "kha", "kha", "aṣṭi" and "yamāḥ" and they denote the numbers "0", "0", "16" and "2" respectively in that order. To obtain the modern equivalent of the number indicated by kha-kh-āṣṭi-yamāḥ, the four numbers have to be arranged in the reverse order, namely, in the order "2", "16","0" and "0". Placing these four numbers side by side we get the number 21600.[1] Incidentally, the number 21600 is the number of minutes in a full circle.

A potential user of the system had a multitude of words to choose from for denoting the same number. The mapping from "words" to "numbers" is many-to-one. This has facilitated the embedding of numbers in verses in Indian treatises on mathematics and astronomy. This helped in memorising large tables of numbers required by astronomers and astrologers.[1]

The system has also been used extensively in epigraphical inscriptions in the Indian subcontinent for inscribing dates and years.[1] As an example, in an inscription from Kalna, the date is given in bhūtasaṃkhyā system as bāṇa-vyoma-dharādhar-indu-gaṇite śāke which means "In the Śāka year enumerated by the arrows [5], the sky [0], the mountains [7] and the moon [1]", that is, in Śāka 1705 = AD 1783."[5]

The earliest reference employing object numbers is a ca. 269 CE Sanskrit text, Yavanajātaka (literally "Greek horoscopy") of Sphujidhvaja, a versification of an earlier (ca. 150 CE) Indian prose adaptation of a lost work of Hellenistic astrology.[6]

See also

References
  1. D.C. Sircar (1965). Indian Epigraphy (1 ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited. pp. 228–234. ISBN 81-208-1166-6.
  2. David Pingree (September 22, 2003). "The logic of non-Western science: mathematical discoveries in medieval India". Daedalus. American Academy of Arts & Sciences. 132 (4): 45–53. doi:10.1162/001152603771338779. JSTOR 20027880.
  3. Kim Plofker (2009). Mathematics in India: 500 BCE–1800 CE. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 47–48. ISBN 978-0-691-12067-6.
  4. Kim Plofker (2007). "Mathematics in India". In Victor J Katz (ed.). The mathematics of Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, India, and Islam: a sourcebook. Princeton University Press. pp. 420–421. ISBN 978-0-691-11485-9.
  5. Richard Solomon (1998). Indian epigraphy: a guide to the study of inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit and other Indo-Aryan languages. Oxford University Press. p. 173. ISBN 978-0-19-509984-3.
  6. David Pingree (1978). The Yavanajātaka of Sphujidhvaja. Harvard Oriental Series. 48 (2 vols). Harvard University Press.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.